RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01204
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The Article 15 imposed on 1 June 1970, be expunged from his records.
2. He be entitled to the Purple Heart (PH).
3. His 1968-1969 service as a dog handler in Air Force Specialty Code
(AFSC) 81150A be reflected in his records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was intimidated by a senior noncommissioned officer and his “Gestapo
Tactic,” and would now like to clear his name. Although he has not seen
the Article 15 in his record, he knows he was punished.
He is entitled to the PH for a shrapnel wound to his right forearm incurred
in Vietnam during an enemy mortar attack. Although his wound was slight,
it was treated by an Army Medic, who told him he would receive the PH and
the paperwork would be forthcoming. However, the documentation never made
it into his records.
He received On-the-Job-Training (OJT) as a dog handler, AFSC 81550A, in
Vietnam.
In support of his appeal, applicant submits his personal statement, a copy
of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed
Forces, extracts from his military and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)
records, and a copy a death certificate pertaining to the 1970 stillborn
death of his daughter.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 April 1967, for a period
of four years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first
class (E-3). During the period from 8 July 1968 to 23 July 1969; he was
assigned to the 633rd Combat Support Group, Pleiku AB, Vietnam, as a
Security Policeman and an Apprentice Air Operations Specialist. A Letter
of Evaluation (LOE) covering the period from 16 October 1968 through 4
January 1969, states, “He was only recently assigned to the Sentry Dog
Section and had not had any formal dog handler’s training. He maintained
his dog and walked his post as directed but showed little initiative.”
On 30 January 1970, his daughter was stillborn at the USAF Regional
Hospital, Eglin AFB, Florida.
On 20 May 1970, the applicant’s supervisor recommended he receive
nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) for violating Article 86. Specifically, on or about, 18 May
1970, without authority, he failed to go at the time prescribed to his
appointed place of duty. He did not demand trial by court-martial, nor did
he submit matters to the commander for consideration. On 1 June 1970, the
commander imposed nonjudicial punishment consisting of two hours of extra
duty for a period of 14 days, i.e., 1 Jun 70 - 14 Jun 70. He did not
appeal the punishment.
He underwent a separation physical on 15 October 1970, and was found
qualified for general military service (separation). The Report of Medical
Examination completed in conjunction with the physical indicated that while
in Vietnam, he was treated for four episodes of Gonorrhea and a urinary
tract infection. However, there is no reference to an injury sustained
during a mortar attack.
On 26 October 1970, he was released from active duty and transferred to the
Air Force Reserve (AFRes). He was honorably discharge from the AFRes on 15
January 1973
Applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to reflect his
entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, with Valor device
(AFOUA, w/V), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross, with Palm (RVNGC, w/P), and 1 year and 8 months of service
in AFSC 27130, Apprentice Air Operations Specialist and 1 year and 10
months of service in AFSC 81150, Security Policeman.
In accordance with AFM 900-3, during the period in question, the Purple
Heart (PH) was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy, or
as a direct result of an act of any enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile
foreign force. For the purpose of considering award of the PH, a wound was
defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or
agent. A physical lesion was not required, provided the concussion or
other form of injury received was due to direct enemy, opposing armed
force, or hostile foreign force action.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be denied as untimely. Should the
Board waive the applicant’s failure to timely file, relief should be denied
on its merit. There is no indication the commander acted
arbitrary/capriciously or the applicant was denied any rights to which
entitled. Congress (and the Secretary via AFI 51-202) has designated only
two officials with the responsibility for determining the appropriateness
of an otherwise lawful punishment: the commander and the appeal authority.
So long as they are lawfully acting within the scope of their authority
granted them by law, their judgment should not be disturbed because others
might disagree. Commanders on the scene have first-hand access to facts
and a unique appreciation for the needs of morale and discipline in their
commander that even the best-intentioned higher headquarters cannot match.
The AFLOS/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSIDC does not support changing the applicant’s records to indicate
he was awarded an “A” suffix to AFSC 81150, denoting sentry dog qualified.
Although the applicant served in AFSC 81150 from April 1967 to February
1969, at which time it was withdrawn, he was awarded AFSC 27010, Aerospace
Operations Control Helper. In March 1970, this AFSC was withdrawn and he
was subsequently awarded AFSC 27130, Apprentice Air Operations Specialists,
which he served in until his 26 October 1970 separation. Therefore, his
records have been administratively corrected to reflect 1 year and 8 months
of service in AFSC 27130, Apprentice Air Operations Specialist and 1 year
and 10 months of service in AFSC 81150, Security Policeman.
The AFPC/DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the request for the PH. To be awarded the
PH, a member must provide documentation to support he or she was wounded as
a direct result of enemy action and the wounds must have received medical
treatment by medical personnel. They were unable to locate documentation,
i.e., special order, in his medical and military records to indicate that
he was awarded the PH. There are no entries in his medical records
indicating treatment of injuries as a result of enemy action.
The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In December 1968, he was returning from the NCO Club at “Mike Forces” Camp,
Fifth Special Forces, Pleiku AB, when he was hit in the right arm between
his elbow and wrist, by a ½ inch piece of shrapnel which imbedded. After
the attack, his wound received medical attention by an Army Medic. His
wound was caused by enemy fire and not while he was seeking shelter. He
did not seek shelter until after he was hit.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We note the applicant’s records have been
administratively corrected to reflect his entitlement to the AFOUA, with
Valor device, the RVNGC, w/Palm, and the AFGCM; and, his completion of 1
year and 8 months of service in AFSC 27130, Apprentice Air Operations
Specialist and 1 year and 10 months of service in AFSC 81150, Security
Policeman. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in
judging the merits of the remainder of his requests; however, we agree with
the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01204
in Executive Session on 21 February 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mrs. Lea Gallogly, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Apr 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 20 Jul 07.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIDC, dated 23 Aug 07.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 11 Sep 07.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Nov 07.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Dec 07, w/atchs.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-02825
DPPPR states that there is no medical documentation showing that the applicant received any wounds or injuries and he did not provide any. His case was denied by the PH Review Board on 22 Oct 03 because of the lack of clear-cut information and documentation showing he was wounded by the enemy and received medical treatment for a wound. Through his Congressman, applicant requested additional time to provide a response to the Air Force evaluation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01991 INDEX CODE: 106.00, 100.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 81150 rather than 81130, and his 1985 discharge be upgraded from general to honorable. According to his Enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04891
The complete DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSICs recommendation is based on the information from his VMET, which does not display the correct amount of time that he worked as a dog handler. The Board can review his Military Working Dog Handler's Certificate, dated 8 January 2010. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03012
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 15 December 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR (Air Force Recognition Programs) notified the applicant that they were able to verify his entitlement to the AFOUA while serving with the 57th Fighter Interceptor Squadron and the AFLSA for his service from 27 August 1966 to 27 November 1971. The remaining relevant evidence extracted from the applicants master personnel records is contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00122
His Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) is 3P0X1 Security Forces. According to records on file with Air Force Retraining, the applicant was number 1 out of 180 (involuntary phase) SSgts identified as vulnerable for involuntary retraining into 180 quotas. The applicant was aware of the program requirements, but failed to submit the application as required and instructed.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01015
He received six stitches in his head for injuries resulting from the attack. DPSIDR states to be awarded the PH a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant disagrees with the Air Force recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02834
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant requests Block 11 of his DD Form 214 be changed to reflect T42399, Master Instructor and Aircraft Electrical Superintendent. The complete DPSIDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterated the errors on his DD Form 214.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01958
His recommendation for the PH medal was disapproved on two occasions by the decorations board. DPSIDR states the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action (e.g. gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). DPSIDR states the medical documentation provided pertains to the burn injuries sustained by the applicant when grabbing a hot weapon.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02555
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). In addition, it is necessary that the wound have required treatment by medical personnel. In regard to the applicant’s request for award of the PH, the Board notes the evidence of record supports the fact that the injuries he sustained on 21 Dec 66 were the result of an aircraft accident and not a direct result of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02565
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02565 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). AFPC/DPSID was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to three Bronze Service Stars (3/BSS) to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service during the period 24 May 63...