Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04757
Original file (BC-2011-04757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04757 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 
changed to Honorable. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The statement and allegations made against her were untrue. The 
discharge was improper because she never faced an administrative 
discharge board (ABD). It was unfair to give her a UOTHC 
discharge as she was so close to finishing her four your tour. 
She had an outstanding service record and she has been a good 
citizen since being discharged. 

 

In support of her appeal, she provides an expanded statement, 
copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, numerous Witness Interview Sheets, and her 
1986 letter to her Congressman. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the applicant’s official military records, she 
enlisted in the Air Force on 17 Dec 1982. 

 

On 15 May 86, she was furnished a UOTHC discharge in lieu of a 
court-martial for charges of illegal drug use, and she was 
credited with 3 years, 4 months, and 29 days of active service. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, 
which is at Exhibit C. 

 

 

 


On 19 Apr 12, a copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a 
request for post-service information was forwarded to the 
applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of this case; however, we find no evidence or an error or 
injustice that occurred in the discharge process. We note the 
applicant’s military personnel records do not contain a copy of 
the discharge package. Therefore, the facts and circumstances 
that precipitated her UOTHC discharge could not be verified. 
However, based on the presumption of regularity in the conduct 
of governmental affairs, absent evidence to the contrary, we 
must assume the applicant’s discharge, to include her service 
characterization, was proper and in compliance with the 
directive under which it was effected. Other than her own 
assertions, the applicant has presented no evidence to indicate 
otherwise. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading 
the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any 
evidence of a successful post-service transition, we are not 
inclined to recommend granting relief upon this basis. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend favorable consideration of the 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04757 in Executive Session on 14 Jun 12, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Vice Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Nov 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Apr 12, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00631

    Original file (BC-2011-00631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00631 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect her characterization of discharge as general (under honorable conditions) rather than under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC). On 12 December 2002,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00272

    Original file (BC-2011-00272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Aug 84, Headquarters Fifteenth Air Force approved the discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge. At the same time, the applicant was offered an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04102

    Original file (BC-2011-04102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was discharged on 24 May 93. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Feb 12, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01689

    Original file (BC-2011-01689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01689 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 14 Nov 96, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for drug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04921

    Original file (BC-2011-04921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Feb 95, the findings and recommendations of the administrative discharge board were found legally sufficient and, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a UOTHC discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report which is attached at Exhibit C. A copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a request for post- service information was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Jul 12 (Exhibit D). We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02160

    Original file (BC-2012-02160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. While the applicant contends her two years of service merit an honorable discharge, we find no evidence or an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. It...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01499

    Original file (BC-2010-01499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 1977, after consulting with counsel, the applicant filed her request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Air Force Manual 39-12, Chapter 2, Section F. She indicated that if her request for discharge was approved, she understood it may result in her receiving a UOTHC discharge. On 23 March 1978 and 8 December 1980, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade her discharge. Furthermore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03995

    Original file (BC-2011-03995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03995 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was out of work for 8 months, and then went back to work, but in 1981, he reinjured his knee that required surgery. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00502

    Original file (BC-2011-00502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 November 1964, the discharge authority approved the recommendation to discharge the applicant with an undesirable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Exhibit C. FBI Report.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00666

    Original file (BC-2010-00666.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to convince us to recommend...