RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03704
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) Code be changed from 2B, which denotes
Approved Involuntary Separation with less than Honorable
Discharge, to one that will allow him to reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was promised at his separation that he would be able to re-
enter the military; however, no branch of service will accept RE
code 2B.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 Jun 10, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 16 Aug 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that
he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of
Airmen, specifically for Minor Disciplinary Infractions. The
reasons for this action awere:
On or about 2 Feb 11, he failed to obey an order by failing to
return to duty. As a result, he received a letter of Counseling
(LOC), dated 2 Feb 11.
On or about 17 Feb 11, he failed to report to his appointed
place of duty. As a result, he received a Letter of Reprimand
(LOR), dated 17 Feb 11.
On or about 20 May 11, he was derelict in the performance of
his duties in that he willfully failed to refrain from signing
student out-processing forms when the students had not completed
the necessary actions. Additionally, on or about 27 May 11, he
made a false official statement. As a result, he received an
Article 15, dated 7 Jul 11. His punishment consisted of
reduction to the grade of airman basic and a reprimand. In
addition, on 13 Jul 11, an Unfavorable Information File (UIF)
was established.
On or about 8 Jun 11, he ignored his chain of command,
disobeyed an order, failed to report to mandatory appointments,
was derelict in the performance of his duties and left his place
of duty before the work day was officially over. As a result,
he received a LOC, dated 10 Jun 11.
On or about 21 Jun 11 through 14 Jul 11, he repeatedly failed
to report to his appointed place of duty and left his place of
duty before the work day was officially over. As a result, he
received a LOR, dated 14 Jul 11.
On 19 Aug 11, the applicant acknowledged the Discharge
Notification and submitted a response.
On 24 Aug 11, the commander directed the applicant be separated
with a general discharge, without probation and rehabilitation.
On 30 Aug 11, he was separated with a general (under honorable
conditions) discharge. He served 1 year, 2 months and 16 days
total active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to
change his RE code. DPSOA states the applicants RE code is
required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air
Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge for
Misconduct.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 Nov 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2011-03704 in Executive Session on 29 Mar 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-03704:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 25 Oct 11
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02298
On or about 18 Oct 11, he was derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully failed to refrain from sleeping during a meeting, as it was his duty to do, as evidenced by a Record of Proceedings of Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment, dated 30 Nov 11. c. On or about 30 Aug 11, he was derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully returned late from lunch and refused to perform tasks assigned to him, as it was his duty to do, as evidenced by a Record of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02429
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02429 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2B (Separated with general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge) be changed to allow him to renter the military. He received a RE code of 2B (Separated with a general or UOTHC discharge), based on his general discharge. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00614
They found no evidence of error or injustice and the applicant did not submit any evidence. However, based on the evidence of record and in the absence of documentation pertaining to his post-service accomplishments, we cannot conclude that clemency is warranted. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03500
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning the applicants request for BMT Honor Graduate status or the SAEMR. A thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record revealed no documentation which establishes the applicant was awarded either the Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon or the SAEMR. Since the applicant received his DD Form 214, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00912
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00912 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2B, “Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge,” be changed. For these actions, she received an LOR, which was placed in her existing UIF. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code (RE) be changed so he can get back into the Air Force and continue his service. According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 1 Jun 12, his commander denied him reenlistment because he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01474
On 3 Jul 12, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide the documents she contends were added to her appeal package without due process. On 24 Jul 12, in response to DPSOA’s request, she stated after submitting her appeal package to the Force Support Squadron, she inquired about the status and was informed her unit had provided additional documentation (i.e. LOC, dated 7 Sep 11, LOC, dated 3 Nov 11, and a LOR, dated 2 Mar 12) to legal for their recommendation to the group commander. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03845
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03845 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B (Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10, with a general discharge) be changed to one that would allow his entry into another branch of military service. On 25 Sep 87, the proposed...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02996 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 3 Dec 86, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibits F and G).