RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03845
INDEX CODE: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B (Involuntarily separated
under AFR 39-10, with a general discharge) be changed to one that
would allow his entry into another branch of military service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time of his discharge, he was not informed the RE code would
preclude him from enlisting in another branch of service.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an expanded
statement, extracts from his military personnel records, college
transcripts, and professional and character reference letters.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 7 Aug 86 for a period of four years in the
grade of airman basic (E-1).
On 18 Sep 87, he was notified of his commander's intent to recommend
his discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. The reasons for the
action were:
a. He did on or about 26 Aug 87, fail to go to his appointed
place bf duty, for which he received an Article 15 and a Letter of
Reprimand (LOR), dated 3 Sep 87.
b. He reported late for duty on or about 26 Aug 87, for which
he received a Record of Individual Counseling, dated 26 Aug 87.
c. He did, on or about 3 Aug 87, fail to report to his
appointed place of duty on time, for which he received an LOR, dated
13 Aug 87.
d. He failed to report to his appointed place of duty on time,
on or about 7 Aug 87, for which he received an LOR and a Record of
Individual Counseling, dated 7 Aug 87.
e. On or about 29 Jul 87, he was not at his appointed duty
section.
f. On or about 26 May 87 , he was found to have unauthorized
weapons and ammunition, stored in your dormitory room, for which he
received an LOR, dated 28 May 87.
g. On or about 6 May 87, he sped through the parking lot of the
Diesel Shop.
The applicant was advised of his rights in the matter. He consulted
legal counsel and submitted a statement in his own behalf.
On 25 Sep 87, the proposed action was found legally sufficient and on
1 Oct 87, the discharge authority approved the discharge action.
Applicant was discharged on 9 Oct 87 under the provisions of AFR 39-10
(Misconduct – Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions) and furnished
a general discharge. He was assigned an RE code of 2B. He was
credited with one year, two months and three days of total active
service.
On 15 Apr 03, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered
and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his general
discharge to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating they found no evidence of an
error or injustice. Based on the applicant’s service
characterization, his RE code of 2B is correct.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial indicating that based on the
documentation in the applicant’s records, his discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided
no facts warranting a change to his RE code.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations, with attachments, were forwarded
to the applicant on 8 Feb 08 for review and response within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice. We noted the applicant was given a general
discharge for minor disciplinary infractions, and his assigned RE code
of 2B accurately reflects the circumstances of his separation.
However, as noted, the incidents were minor in nature. Also, it
appears the applicant has made a successful transition to civilian
life. Therefore, we recommend that his RE code be changed to 3K,
which is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment
consideration, provided he meets all other requirements for enlistment
under an existing prior service program. Whether or not he is
successful will depend on the needs of the service and our
recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be allowed to return
to any branch of the service.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge on 9 Oct 87, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code was
“3K.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-03845 in Executive Session on 13 Mar 08, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Nov 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 27 Dec 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 28 Jan 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 08.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-03845
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge on 9 October 1987, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
was “3K.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02843
On 9 Aug 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to report for duty at the appointed place and time. d. On 15 Sep 82, he received an LOC for failing to adequately support his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01497
On 2 Oct 89, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. He was discharged on 11 Oct 89. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00844
On 4 Mar 02, the applicant's commander notified her that he was recommending she be discharged from the Air Force for misconduct-minor disciplinary infractions. They found no evidence of error or injustice and the applicant did not submit any evidence. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00614
They found no evidence of error or injustice and the applicant did not submit any evidence. However, based on the evidence of record and in the absence of documentation pertaining to his post-service accomplishments, we cannot conclude that clemency is warranted. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03383
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03383 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed in a manner to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01317
DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include his characterization of service and RE code, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02498
On 25 May 00, applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and his RE code be changed to allow his return to military service. The Board found that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiated an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge or an upgrade of his RE code. The Board further concluded that no legal or equitable basis exists for an upgrade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02335
On 6 Apr 12, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) denied the applicants requests to upgrade his discharge, change his narrative reason for separation and RE code. A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial as it pertains to the applicants request to change the SPD code, narrative reason for separation, and character of service. Therefore, as the applicant has presented no evidence to indicate that the commander abused his discretionary...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02173
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors that occurred in the discharge processing, and provided no facts warranting an upgrade to his discharge characterization. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02173 in Executive Session on 27 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: