Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03507
Original file (BC-2011-03507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03507 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served over two years in the Air Force and it has been over 
24 years since his release. He has a clean record and desires to 
upgrade his discharge. 

 

The applicant provides no documentation in support of his claim. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 December 
1984. 

 

The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to 
recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the provisions 
of AFR 39-10. The specific reasons follow: 

 

 a. The applicant received two Letters of Reprimand (LORs) on 
or about 2 December 1985 and 26 April 1986 for failure to obey a 
lawful order and he was derelict in the performance of his 
duties. 

 

 b. The applicant received two Letters of Counseling (LOCs) 
on 4 April 1986 and 24 May 1986 for two traffic citations. 

 

 c. On or about 31 May 1986, the applicant stole a beer keg. 
For this misconduct he received an Article 15. His punishment 
consisted of a suspended reduction, forfeiture of $170 for two 
months, and 30 days correctional custody. 

 

On or about 26 December 1986 to January 1987, the applicant 
wrongfully used marijuana. For this misconduct he received an 


Article 15. His punishment consisted of a reduction in grade to 
airman basic. 

 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and after consulting 
with counsel he elected to waive his right to submit a statement 
in his own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the case 
was found legally sufficient and discharge was recommended. The 
discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and 
directed a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The 
applicant was discharged on 28 April 1987. He served 2 years, 
4 months and 2 days on active duty. 

 

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an 
arrest record which is at Exhibit C. 

 

On 21 October 2011, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation and 
a request for information pertaining to his post-service 
activities was forwarded to the applicant for review and response 
within 30 days (Exhibit D). 

 

The applicant provided a response indicating since his discharge 
from the Air Force he attended Colorado Institute of Art in 
Denver and obtained an Associate’s Degree in Music and Video 
Business. He feels that he has paid the price for his actions. 
He comes from a good family and he actively volunteers in his 
community. He seeks clemency. 

 

The applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. 
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed. We considered 
upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not 


find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to 
recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03507 in Executive Session on 5 April 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03507 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 September 2011. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Federal Bureau of Investigation Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 October 2011. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 1 November 2011, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01955

    Original file (BC-2012-01955.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He assumed his discharge was upgraded until he requested his records on 2 Nov 2011. 2 On or about 5 Sep 1986, he failed to perform quality On or about 16 Oct 1987, he failed to report to work. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01300

    Original file (BC-2010-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01300 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04569

    Original file (BC-2010-04569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 July 1989, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 2 March 2011, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments in response to the FBI Report and about his post service activities (Exhibit D). Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01255

    Original file (BC-2011-01255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 June 1988, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in the grade of airman basic. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01834

    Original file (BC-2010-01834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01834 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03701

    Original file (BC-2007-03701.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 January 1989, he was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airman, para 5-26d, Irresponsibility in the management of personal finances. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 10 February 2008.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00839

    Original file (BC-2010-00839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00839 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03360

    Original file (BC-2007-03360.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 September 1986, the applicant was released from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service for misconduct – drug abuse. On 8 February 2008, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02542

    Original file (BC-2008-02542.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The commander informed the applicant of his rights, to include being represented by legal counsel and presenting his case to an administrative discharge board and, on 3 December 1987, he waived his right to present his case to an administrative discharge board, contingent on his receiving no less than a general discharge. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02542 in Executive Session on 11 February 2009...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00503

    Original file (BC-2011-00503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 15...