Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03462
Original file (BC-2011-03462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 

AFBCMR BC-2011-03462 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR 

 

 

SUBJECT: 

 

 Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis 
for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. 
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that on 23 January 
2006, he was authorized by competent authority to procure the pickup and storage of his 
household goods (HHG) for the period of February 2006 to April 2007; and, he was 
authorized reimbursement for the pickup and storage of his HHG for that same period in 
the amount of $4,263.83. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

Attachment: 

Ltr, PPA HQ/ECAF, dated 2 Dec 11. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00637

    Original file (BC-2006-00637.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00637 INDEX CODE: 128.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to repay all charges associated with the nontemporary storage (NTS) and have his shipping entitlements reinstated so he can reship his household goods (HHG) at government expense. Therefore, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703541

    Original file (9703541.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UN 3 0 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of ment of the Air The pertinent Force relating to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02814

    Original file (BC-2005-02814.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The entitlement begins on the date the orders are issued and terminates one year from the date of termination of active duty. However, evidence shows the applicant agreed to have his HHG shipped to Lancaster, CA, upon his separation from active duty and subsequently requested an extension of storage until 23 December 2005. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007243

    Original file (20080007243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). An Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, dated 8 January 2007, shows in item 10 (Destination Information) that the applicant elected to ship his HHG to Dallas, Texas. In response to the request for reimbursement of the cost of shipping his HHGs from Texas to Arizona, the DA G-4 authorized a partial payment to the applicant of $1,175.33, which was the maximum cost that would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011614C071029

    Original file (20060011614C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was told by the Yongsan, Korea transportation office that the shipment [papers] showed delivery, but he would have to contact the Colorado transportation office for an exact delivery date. He stated he was told in Korea that a delivery date had to be entered on the DD Form 1299.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020109

    Original file (20110020109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment for the portion his household goods (HHG) moved by personal vehicle during his do-it-yourself (DITY) move in 2011. The printout also shows payment for a hotel reservation in New Mexico was authorized on 23 April 2011 and two other payments categorized by merchant type "Travel Agencies & Tour Operators" were authorized on 20 and 24 April 2011. g. A memorandum for record, dated 27 April 2011, signed by his commander states he was aware the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03080

    Original file (BC-2006-03080.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE 128.02 AFBCMR BC-2006-03080 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01081

    Original file (BC-2012-01081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Per Special Order ACD-00858, dated 26 May 2006, the deceased member was relieved from active duty and permanently disability retired effective 6 Jul 2006. The entitlement to ship HHG was exhausted when the shipments were moved to the HOS upon the member’s retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01131

    Original file (BC-2011-01131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant filed a rebuttal, dated 2 November 2010, stating that he received an estimate of $297.00 for excess cost when scheduling his move, which was significantly lower than the $6,500.00 actual debt. He is willing to pay some of the additional cost, but, it seems the actual rates used were never disclosed to him. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03808

    Original file (BC-2005-03808.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was counseled that he is entitled to one year of storage following his retirement from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...