RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01405
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 NOVEMBER 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During the time of the infraction, he was going through extreme
emotional problems that impaired his ability to serve
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 June 1954 in the
grade of airman basic (E-1). Applicant was separated from the Air
Force on 8 July 1955 under the provisions of AFR 39-17, Discharge of
Airman Because of Unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. He was
credited with one year and five days of active duty service.
On 9 May 1955 the applicant’s commander notified him that he was
recommending discharge from the Air Force based on the following:
1) 22 Nov 54, applicant failed to report back to his duty section.
2) 24 Nov 54, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to
report back to work.
3) 9 Jan 55, applicant was apprehended for disorderly conduct.
4) 22 Jan 55, applicant received an Article 15 for disorderly
conduct on station.
5) 21 Mar 55, applicant was apprehended by civil police for driving
without a driver’s permit.
6) 2 Apr 55, applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 2 Apr
55 to 4 Apr 55.
7) 14 Apr 55, applicant received a summary court-martial and
sentenced to two months hard labor and forfeiture of $40 pay for
two months.
8) 24 Mar 55, applicant was reported to the squadron commander for
dereliction of duty and verbally reprimanded.
9) 1 Apr 55, applicant further demonstrated neglect and dereliction
of duties and responsibilities by failure to perform bay
orderly.
10) Applicant was counseled and reprimanded numerous times by the
squadron commander and first sergeant for being late for
formation, out of uniform, disorderly conduct and dereliction of
duty.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge
and understood that he was entitled to a hearing by a board of
officers. He waived his entitlement to appear before a board of
officers and requested discharge without benefit of board proceedings.
The discharge authority approved the separation and directed that the
applicant be discharge with an undesirable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in
the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no
facts warranting a change in his character of service.
AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
26 May 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
A copy of the Federal Bureau of Investigation report was forwarded to
the applicant on 10 July 2006 for review and comment within 14 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
the evidence provided, the discharge appears to be in compliance with
the governing manual and we find no evidence to indicate that his
separation from the Air Force was inappropriate or that it was based
on any factors other than his own misconduct. We find no evidence of
error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation
submitted in support of applicant’s appeal, we do not believe he has
suffered from an injustice. In addition, in view of the contents of
the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade
of the characterization of applicant’s discharge is warranted on the
basis of clemency. Therefore, based on the available evidence of
record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider his request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-
01405 in Executive Session on 26 September 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Apr 06, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 May 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 May 06.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Jul 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01438
The board convened on 18 Mar 55 and recommended the applicant be discharged with an undesirable characterization for unfitness, and the discharge authority approved the discharge. A complete copy of the HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 8 Jun 06, the applicant indicates he began drinking when his squadron was transferred to Japan because they had too...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02153
Based on the limited documentation in the applicant’s file, they found that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at the time of his discharge. The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Aug 03 for review and comment within...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03714
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge reflects the applicant was discharged on 31 October 1958, in the grade of AB with an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge, in accordance with Air Force Regulation 39-17 for unfitness. Applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) in 5 February 1979 to have his undesirable discharge upgraded to honorable. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02164
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 30 Jul 04. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03075
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03075 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 APRIL 2008 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In addition, he states his supervisor indicated his discharge would be automatically...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03499
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03499 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 May 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1988 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The recommendation was approved on 7 Dec 88.] Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00146
In support of his request, the applicant submits personal statements and copies of her father’s DD Form 214 and Statement of Service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). After considering the evidence and testimony, the Board of Officers determined that the former member should be discharged with an undesirable discharge because of unfitness.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02066
In a similar appeal, the applicant requested his BCD be upgraded to General (Under Honorable Conditions) by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided no facts warranting an upgrade of her discharge. Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 06;and, SAF/MRBC, dated 31 Aug 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02427
On 3 Jun 82, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge to general or honorable. On 30 Aug 82, a similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board (see Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In the applicant’s response to the evaluation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...