Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00795
Original file (BC-2011-00795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00795 

 

 (MEMBER) COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 (APPLICANT) 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. Her former spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he was 
eligible for retirement and; 

 

2. He made a timely election for spouse coverage under the 
Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She believes she is entitled to receive her former spouse’s 
retired pay. He filled out the necessary forms electing her as 
his beneficiary. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides an expanded 
statement and copies of an ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component 
Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, and a letter from the 
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ ARPC/DPTT recommends denial. The servicemember accepted an 
early retirement on 13 Aug 96. He was notified on 23 Oct 96 of 
his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP. He elected Option C 
(immediate annuity) for spouse and child coverage based on full 


retired pay on 12 Jan 97. The servicemember passed away on 
18 Jul 04 and the applicant began receiving the RCSBP annuity in 
July 2004. The applicant sent DFAS her Certificate of 
Eligibility along with a copy of her marriage certificate 
indicating she had remarried. She was 46 years old at the time 
of her remarriage. Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), 
Section 1450(b)(2) states the annuity terminates if a spouse 
remarries before age 55. In addition, Title 10, U.S.C., Section 
1450(b)(3) states if the surviving spouse remarries before 
reaching age 55 and that marriage is terminated by death, 
annulment, or divorce, payment of the annuity shall be resumed 
effective as of the first day of the month in which the marriage 
is so terminated. 

 

The complete HQ ARPC/DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The forms the servicemember completed electing her as his 
beneficiary did not indicate anything regarding the implications 
of remarriage on her benefits. This form is a legal document 
and, absent this information, her annuity should not be 
terminated based on these provisions. 

 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include the 
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, we 
agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. While it is regrettable the 
applicant may not have been aware of the impact of remarrying 
before turning age 55, unfortunately due to the provision of law 
on this issue, the relief requested is outside the Board’s 
authority. Therefore, we must recommend that the requested 
relief be denied. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00795 in Executive Session on 27 Oct 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 29 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Jul 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010653C080407

    Original file (20070010653C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage election made by her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to "Former Spouse", and that she be provided a SBP annuity based on the death of the FSM. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant and the FSM were divorced on 5 August 1997, and that the FSM submitted a SBP election change to "Former Spouse" in December 1997, within a year of the divorce, as directed in the divorce...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00104

    Original file (BC 2014 00104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 3 Jan 14, the applicant signed DD Form 2656-6, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate, establishing his children as the beneficiaries of his RCSBP. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04553

    Original file (BC 2013 04553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the deceased former member was married to someone other than the applicant at the time of his death. On 6 Jun 02, the deceased former member made an RCSBP election for Option C, “Immediate Annuity” for spouse only coverage. The applicant claimed that the deceased former member assured her several times that he had designated her as a former spouse under RCSBP, but the required action was not accomplished in compliance with law.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800351

    Original file (9800351.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Eligibility and premiums are reinstated effective the first day of the month after the date the former spouse's remarriage terminates. Discussion: Although the member made no election change during the required one- year time limit following divorce, there is no evidence that he requested DFAS terminate his former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001

    Original file (BC-2012-02001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703182

    Original file (9703182.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. The member 97031 82 remarried 21 Jul90. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, to preclude a possible injustice, we recommend partial relief: the member's record should be corrected to reflect that on 28 Jun 88 he elected to change SBP spouse and child -vera e to former spouse and child coverage...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862

    Original file (BC-2012-01862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01572

    Original file (BC-2012-01572.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband paid SBP premiums for his former spouse’s SBP coverage from January 1996 to June 2004, even though the former spouse remarried in September 2003 before her 55th birthday. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 15 Nov 12, Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Dec 12, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00858

    Original file (BC-2003-00858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he completed the form he had been divorced since 1984. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. In 1990, the applicant remarried; however, the applicant did not request any changes to the RCSBP coverage within a year of the marriage, as required by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008892

    Original file (20140008892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 August 2013, they received his application for the annuity and at that time they discovered that he and the FSM had remarried on 5 September 2002. c. If a member who had elected former spouse coverage subsequently married, subject to certain limitations, she/he could change the former spouse election to provide an annuity on the new spouse in accordance with Title 10, USC, section 1450(f). Notwithstanding the fact that neither the FSM nor the applicant notified DFAS at any time after...