Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00422
Original file (BC-2011-00422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00422 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Distinguished Service 
Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster (DSM w/1OLC). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was approved for the DSM w/1OLC; however, due to an oversight 
by the personnel section at the time of his retirement, it is not 
reflected on his DD Form 214. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a certificate 
for award of the DSM w/1OLC and a citation to accompany the 
award. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty in the Air Force from 13 Sep 
55 to 30 Jun 89. He was released from active duty and retired in 
the grade of major general (0-8) effective 1 Jul 89 after serving 
33 years, 9 months, and 18 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states a copy of the 
applicant’s citation was located in his military personnel 
record. However, without a special order to verify his 
entitlement they recommend disapproval. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant states consideration should be given based on the 
fact retroactive special orders to verify his entitlement to the 
DSM w/1OLC are not available since the issuing personnel office 
(San Antonio Air Logistics Center, Kelly AFB, TX) was closed in 
2001, due to Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). He provided 
the accompanying citation; this citation was also found in his 
records. 

 

The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence presented, we are persuaded 
relief is warranted. The evidence provided, we believe 
substantiates the applicant’s claim that he was recommended for 
the DSM 1/OLC and that it was approved up through the chain of 
command. We note the DSM 1/OLC certificate is dated 20 Jun 89, 
and the applicant’s date of separation was 30 Jun 89; thus, the 
possibility exists that it was not processed in time to be 
awarded prior to his separation. Therefore, we believe the 
interest of justice can best be served by resolving any doubt in 
the applicant’s behalf. Accordingly, we recommend his records be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the DD Form 
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 
in conjunction with his 30 Jun 89 retirement from the Regular Air 
Force, be, and hereby is, amended in Block 13, Decorations, 
Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or 
Authorized, to reflect award of the Distinguished Service Medal 
First Oak Leaf Cluster. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-00422 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 11 Feb 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Mar 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01505

    Original file (BC-2011-01505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the SWASM w/1BSS for his service in Cairo West from 11 Mar 93 to 17 Jun 93, the ACM w/ 1BSS, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFESR w/1OLC), and the NATO-ISAF for his service in Afghanistan from 4 Feb 07 to 9 Aug 07. The MUA is awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01642

    Original file (BC-2011-01642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to include the following awards, decorations, training courses, and qualifications and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected appropriately: 1. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04090

    Original file (BC-2009-04090.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits three letters of recommendation for the LOM w/1OLC, his LOM narrative with citation, and his senior officer personnel brief. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR makes no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00095

    Original file (BC-2009-00095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states the applicant does not provide any documentation proving he was awarded the BSM w/1 OLC. DPSIDR notes the Belgian Congo was not considered to be an opposing armed enemy force of the United States. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH w/1OLC or BSM w/1OLC.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02181

    Original file (BC-2004-02181.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He believes the absence of this information prejudiced his consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel. He states the Air Force awarded him two DFC (Basic) awards in 1992 and later claimed that one of the DFCs had not been awarded until after his colonel selection board. Although the panel has recommended the applicant’s records, to include two Air Medals (AMs) and a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), be considered by an SSB for the CY01B board, they do not recommend the DFC, 1 OLC,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00508

    Original file (BC-2012-00508.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00508 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show he was awarded a second Air Force Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02257

    Original file (BC-2008-02257.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR defers to the board for a decision in the applicant's request for award of the MSM w/1OLC. Therefore, based on the evidence provided, it appears that he did in fact receive the MSM w/1OLC upon his retirement from the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00269

    Original file (BC-2009-00269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFCM, 1OLC, indicating that based on the applicant’s military record and provided documentation, they were able to verify her entitlement to the AFEM for time served in Kuwait and the AFCM, Basic, based on Special Order GA-07. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00984

    Original file (BC 2014 00984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00984 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for outstanding achievement, rendered for the period 15 May 08 through 26 Jun 13, be replaced by the AFAM, First Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) for outstanding achievement for the period 26 Jun 13 through 14 Aug 13. However, it appears the approval authority recognized the error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03420

    Original file (BC-2011-03420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03420 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by...