Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00415
Original file (BC-2011-00415.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00415 

COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His physical fitness test (PFT) be deleted from his records. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

There was a breakdown in communication and he was misinformed 
about the PFT process that led to an unsatisfactory score. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides of a copy of a 
letter of support. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). 

 

AFPC/DPSIMC sent a letter to the applicant requesting additional 
supporting documentation to substantiate his claim. 
Specifically, they asked for a copy of his paid travel voucher to 
validate when he returned from his deployment and a copy of his 
42-day exemption requested by his Unit Fitness Program Manager 
(UFPM) and the disapproval letter from the 55 FSS Fitness 
Assessment Cell (55 FSS/FAC). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant 
returned from his deployment on 30 Sep 10 and completed his 
fitness assessment on 6 Oct 10. During the test the applicant 
became ill and was unable to complete the test. The UFPM 
informed the applicant that he was eligible for the 42-day 
exemption due to deployment. THE UFPM submitted a request to the 
55 FSS/FAC; however, the request was disapproved. Furthermore, 
DPSIM’s request for additional information to support the 


applicant’s request was not received. DPSIM notes that IAW the 
governing regulations the applicant has the burden of providing 
sufficient evidence of probable material error or injustice; 
however, no such evidence has been received. 

 

The DPSIM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 17 Jun 11 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this 
respect, we believe the applicant’s request for a PFT waiver 
should have been approved due to his recent deployment. However, 
since the waiver was denied and he became ill after attempting to 
complete the test, we believe the fitness test that he took on 
6 Oct 10 should be deleted from his records. Therefore, we 
recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his Fitness 
Assessment score dated 6 October 2010 was removed from the Air 
Force Fitness Management System. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00415 in Executive Session on 18 Aug 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011-00415 
was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jan 11, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 May 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jun 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388

    Original file (BC 2013 03388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.” The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331

    Original file (BC 2013 02331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02692

    Original file (BC 2013 02692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Jul 2013 79.30 Satisfactory *30 Apr 2013 36.50 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 2012 81.90 Satisfactory 3 Oct 2012 71.60 Unsatisfactory 15 May 2012 Exempt Exempt *Contested FA On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592

    Original file (BC 2013 02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    from the Unit CC;” and Atch 1, Para 13 “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.” The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00” Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50” Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50” Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00” Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00” Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951

    Original file (BC 2013 02951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she “Meets” the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01986

    Original file (BC-2012-01986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 6 April 2012 be adjusted to reflect incomplete in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...