AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03502
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told during a separation briefing that he would be able to
rejoin the military 6 months after being discharged from the Air
Force. He feels it to be unjust that he cannot enlist in the
Navy or Marines. He is now ready to serve his country despite
his past mistakes. He feels he was instigated by other people
and thought it was okay to act the way he did; however, he now
knows his actions were improper and takes sole responsibility for
his actions. He is ready to serve his country with respect,
responsibility, and honor.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 21 Oct 08.
He was notified by his commander that he was recommending him for
discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32
and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5D, Entry Level Performance
or Conduct, Paragraph 5.22, eligibility and criteria, paragraph
5.22.2. The specific reason for this action was for his
unsatisfactory performance and conduct as documented in his Basic
Training Record (LAFB Form 105A), with separate negative entries
dated 4 Nov 08; 6 Nov 08, 17 Nov 08, 21 Nov 08, and 25 Nov 08,
that document the applicant’s minor disciplinary infractions and
his failure to adapt to the military environment. His commander
recommended he be discharged with an entry-level discharge. The
applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge notification. He
was counseled and elected not to submit a statement on his own
behalf. He was discharged on 15 Dec 08 after serving 1 month and
25 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant
received the appropriate RE code of “2C” for his entry-level
separation which coincides with his uncharacterized service for
serving less than 180 days of continuous active service. The
applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in
regards to his RE code. DPSOA notes that other components of the
military determine their own eligibility criteria for prior
service personnel, and have the right to change their criteria at
anytime to meet their individual needs. It is not the RE code
that prevents the applicant from entering the military; however,
it is each component’s policy in reference to RE codes.
The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 27 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We note that
members separated from the Air Force are furnished an RE code
predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of
their separation. The evidence of record indicates the applicant
was given an entry level separation for his performance. As a
result, he was assigned an RE code of 2C. He has provided no
evidence which would lead us to believe his entry level
separation was improper or contrary to the provisions of the
governing instruction, or that the RE code was not appropriately
assigned. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to
recommend favorable action on the applicant’s request that his RE
code of 2C be changed.
2
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-03502 in Executive Session on 7 Apr 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 29 Oct 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Nov 10.
Panel Chair
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
3
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00620
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00620 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 3K (Secretarial Authority). On 4 Nov 08, his commander notified him that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02629
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02629 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 RE code series that would allow him to reenlist. However, HAF/A1P is postured to reevaluate those Airmen who were affected by entry level separation for failing academically between fiscal years...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03354
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, and D. ______________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends approval in changing the applicants RE code. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends his RE code be changed to 2C DPSOA states the RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01530
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. On 27 Sep 07, the applicant requested his separation from the Air Force because he had “no motivation to stay in the Air Force and it would be a waste of government...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C-Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without service characterization be changed to allow him to enlist in the National Guard. The HQ AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05451
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05451 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00942
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, medical records and letters from his doctors. On 19 Nov 08, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.14. for Erroneous Enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01252
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01252 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code be changed from 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service to 3C which denotes First Term Airman not yet considered under the SRP or an appropriate code, to allow him to re-enlist. The RE code 2C is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02363
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and...