RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02950
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed so he may reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His RE code should be changed so he can reenlist in the Air Force and continue his service where he left off. He suffered from enuresis during basic military training (BMT) due to the stress of the new environment. He sought treatment for the condition, but to no avail. He wanted to try stronger medication, but was not allowed to do so. He was given the choice to continue training, or go home. He was too embarrassed by his condition to continue with training, so he chose to be discharged. To this day, he regrets leaving BMT. He has not suffered the symptoms of enuresis since leaving the Air Force and the stresses of his current profession in corrections has not caused him to have another episode.
In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and documentation from his attending physician.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/SGPS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant contends he only had a few episodes associated with enuresis while he was in BMT. He indicates he no longer suffers from these symptoms and, as such, is fit for reenlistment in the Air Force. However, a review of his records reveals he has suffered these symptoms since the age of six, with four to five episodes per week. During BMT, he suffered two to three episodes in his sleep, and one to two episodes while he was awake. He was seen at the Reid clinic and prescribed medication which proved to be ineffective. Since the condition is not compatible with military service, he was processed for release and separated.
A complete copy of the AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant was involuntarily discharged with an entry level separation and uncharacterized service on 28 Oct 09, after serving 28 days on active duty. He received an RE code of 2C as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the US Air Force, based on his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. The applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to is RE code and HQ AETC/SGPS found his separation for enuresis appropriate and does not support his reentry into the Air Force.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jan 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After careful consideration of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant corrective action. We rely on the advisory opinions as the basis for our opinion. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02950 in Executive Session on 22 Mar 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Aug 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 31 Aug 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, undated.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 11.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03242
In this case, the applicant indicated his urinary incontinence was exacerbated by over-hydrating during the day and he should be granted a waiver to continue his service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant argues that the only time he should have been prevented from participating in his graduation was during the time he was experiencing...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02501
On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interferes with military service, specifically for mental disorders. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant also stated his desire to leave the military due to increased anxiety and stress at home. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00970
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 10 Jan 13, his commander recommended he be given an entry level discharge for mental disorders under...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service and Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, Approved Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00422
From his time in basic training, he actually experienced repeated symptoms of asthma and had a thorough examination by Pulmonary/Allergy specialists. Based upon the applicants failure to disclose his prior service medical condition, his commander recommended an entry level separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05034
DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...