RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04656
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, issued in conjunction with his 1 Sep 09 retirement, be
corrected to reflect in Item 11, Primary Specialty, the
following data:
3C072, Communications-Computer Systems Programming
Craftsman, 8 years, 9 months;
8C000, Family Support Center, 1 year;
1A151B, Flight Engineer Journeyman, Helicopter,
6 years, 6 months
2A353J, Tactical Aircraft Maintenance Journeyman,
General (Except F-15/F-16), 6 years, 1 month.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His DD Form 214 is grossly inaccurate and does not reflect his
web submission, and fails to give credit to over 12½ years of
service in the flight and aircraft maintenance career field.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214 Web Screenshot and a copy of his DD Form 214 he
received at retirement.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was relieved from active duty on 31 Aug 09 under
the provisions of AFI 36-3203, in conjunction with his 1 Sep 09
retirement. He was credited with 22 years, 5 months, and 9 days
of active duty service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDC provides no recommendation, stating, in part, that
in the absence of specific source documentation that validates
the requested corrective action, they could not determine with
any certainty the length of time the applicant performed in each
of the Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSCs) and the skill level he
attained.
They conducted a thorough review of the applicants record which
only contained circumstantial evidence, performance reports.
They noted that only AF Form 2096, Classification or On-the-Job
Training Action, a P-Series order, PC-III generated AFSC action
notice, or Report on Individual Personnel (RIP) can serve as
source documents to award an AFSC, not performance reports. As
a result, they were not able to determine, from the
documentation in the record, the exact month and year of some of
the changes requested by the applicant. In addition, they noted
that some of the AFSCs have gone through AFSC conversions to a
different code.
The complete AFPC/DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 4 Feb 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, while we note the comments by the Air Force
office of primary responsibility, based on our own independent
review, we did not find the evidence provided, sufficient to
determine the length of time the applicant served in the
respective career fields. Should the applicant be able to
provide documentation, as noted in the Air Force evaluation,
then we would be inclined to reconsider his appeal. In view of
the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-04656 in Executive Session on 2 August 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDC, dated 21 Jan 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Feb 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02834
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant requests Block 11 of his DD Form 214 be changed to reflect T42399, Master Instructor and Aircraft Electrical Superintendent. The complete DPSIDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterated the errors on his DD Form 214.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03372
If she can provide additional documentation to show she performed for a longer period of time in the 426X2 AFSC the Board is willing to reconsider her application. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 11, reflect 42652 Jet Engine Mechanic, 2...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03012
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 15 December 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR (Air Force Recognition Programs) notified the applicant that they were able to verify his entitlement to the AFOUA while serving with the 57th Fighter Interceptor Squadron and the AFLSA for his service from 27 August 1966 to 27 November 1971. The remaining relevant evidence extracted from the applicants master personnel records is contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05307 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect that he was awarded a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A5X1 (Aircraft Maintenance). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest level of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00931 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 55590, Programs and Work Control Superintendent. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 55590, Programs and Work Control Superintendent. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02718 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member's continuous active military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02591
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDC recommends denial of the applicants request to change his Air Force Specialty Code and Title on his DD Form 214. The complete DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 Nov 11, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00595
If an individual performed duties in a secondary AFSC, it might be reflected in one of the EPRs or decorations, or in the duty history; however, a secondary AFSC has never been reflected as a separate entry on the SNCO evaluation brief. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Aug 11 for review and...