RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03764
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for discharge, fraudulent entry into
military service, be changed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had no suicidal thoughts prior to joining the Air Force. He
did have personal problems, but prior to his enlistment he did
not have any issues. His emotional condition did not appear
until after he enlisted.
The applicant submits no supporting documentation.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who
served from 10 28 May 2010.
The applicant underwent a mental health evaluation on 19 May
2010. He was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with Depressed
Mood. The diagnosis was incompatible with continued military
service. The mental health evaluator recommended the applicant
be administratively separated and disqualified him from the
Personal Reliability Program (PRP), receiving a security
clearance and weapons handling. The applicant acknowledged the
findings and conclusions and agreed the assessment was accurate.
On 26 May 2010, the applicant was notified of his commanders
intent to discharge him for fraudulent enlistment. On that same
day, the applicant acknowledged his right to counsel and to
submit statements on his behalf: he declined both rights.
On 27 May 2010, the commander approved the recommendation and
directed the applicant be separated in accordance with Air Force
Policy Directive 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and
Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C,
Administrative Separation of Airmen, with an entry level
separation. His narrative reason was listed as fraudulent entry
into military service. He served 19 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the discharge was
consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge instruction and within the discretion of the discharge
authority. The preponderance of evidence reflects no error or
injustice occurred during the discharge process.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 March 2011, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice
that occurred during the discharge process. We find the
narrative reason for separation that was issued at the time of
the applicants separation accurately reflects the circumstances
of his separation. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no
error or injustice occurred during the discharge process.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to favorably consider this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-03764 in Executive Session on 28 June 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 27 Jan 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 11.
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00633
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00633 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and narrative reason for separation be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. During the evaluation, the applicant self-reported he struggled with symptoms of anger and depression since...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into Military Service/Drug Abuse) be changed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty to allow him to enter the Army. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01674 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service) along with the corresponding separation code of JDA be changed to Secretarial Authority. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01636
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and, his Reenlistment (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02068
His narrative reason for separation, “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service,” be changed. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 2 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Aug 2012, copies of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service and Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, Approved Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00263 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be changed to allow his entry into the Army. Furthermore, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04207
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04207 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry-level separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service) be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02685
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02685 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). DPSOS states the Department of Defense...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00143
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00143 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily discharged with an honorable discharge) be changed to allow him to reenter the military. The applicant was honorably discharged effective 18 March 2005 with a reentry...