RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03454
COUNSEL:
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her former husbands records be corrected to show he made a
timely election for former spouse and child coverage under the
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her former husband was ordered by the court three times to put
her and their four children as beneficiaries of SBP upon his
retirement.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her
Certificate of Final Judgment from the Central Juvenile & Family
Court, her divorce decree; a letter from the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS); her DD Form 2556-1, Survivor Benefit
Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage; and DD
Form 2656-10, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)/Reserve Component(RC)
SBP Request for Deemed Election.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant and her former husband were married on 28 May 1988.
The parties divorced on 27 March 2002 and in the Divorce
Settlement Agreement, the applicant and former husband agreed
that the applicant and their minor children would be the
beneficiaries of any survivor benefits. There is no evidence DFAS
received a request from the former husband deeming that an SBP
election made on her behalf during the first year following the
date of be divorce. The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Report
System (DEERS) records show the former husband remarried on
24 June 2002.
On 16 January 2003, the former husband was ordered by a Qualified
Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to ensure the monthly survivor
annuity benefit would be payable to the applicant and their
children. The former husband retired on 1 July 2008 and he
elected child only SBP coverage based on full-retired pay and the
spouse concurred in his election. On 19 June 2009, the applicant
and former husbandreaffirmed the terms of their original decree
and property settlement thatincluded language referring to SBP.
Absent a validelection from the former husband, DFAS establishedthe SBP coverage the applicant elected. The applicantremarried
on 15 August 2006, prior to her 55thbirthday; therefore, she is
not eligible as a former spouse SBP beneficiary as long as the
marriage continues.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIAR states there is no evidence of an Air Force error;
however, in the interest of justice and absent a competing
spouse, we recommend the applicantsrecord be corrected to
reflect the former husbandsubmitted a valid request that SBP
coverage be deemed on her behalfand child coverage based on fullretired pay under the SBP, retroactively established effective
1 July 2008. DPSIAR also states the record should further be
corrected to show the former spouse coverage was immediately
suspended, due to the former spouses remarriage prior to age 55,
and child only coverage for their four children was therefore
established. In addition, approval should be contingent upon
recovery of any applicable retroactive cost.
ThecompleteDPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copyof the Air Force evaluation wasforwarded to the member on12 November2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.(ExhibitD).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1.The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2.The application was timely filed.
3.Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case.After thoroughly reviewing the circumstances of this
case, it is our opinion that the former spouse should receive theSBP annuity based on full retired pay tocomply with the divorce
decree and settlement agreement awarding the asset to her by the
court. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation ofthe Air Force office of primary responsibilitythat although the
error was not caused by the Air Force, it would be an injustice
not to change the records. Therefore, we recommend that the
records be corrected as indicated below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 1 July 2008, he elected "former spouse and child
coverage" based on full-retired pay, naming applicant as the
eligible beneficiary.
b. The former spouse's portion of his Survivor Benefit
Plan (SBP) election of former spouse and child coverage based on
full retired pay, naming applicant as the eligible former spouse
beneficiary, was immediately suspended due to the former spouses
remarriage prior to age 55. Child only coverage for the children
resulting from their marriage (children born on 8 January 1995, 7
May 1997, 6 October 2001 and on 6 October 2001) was established.
Approval should be contingent upon recovery of any applicable
retroactive costs.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-03454 in Executive Session on 1 June 2010, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Sep 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 22 Oct 10
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 10.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2010-03454
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT
be corrected to show that:
a. On 1 July 2008, he elected "former spouse and child coverage" based on full-retired
pay, naming applicant as the eligible beneficiary.
b. The former spouse's portion of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of former
spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay, naming Tina as the eligible former spouse
beneficiary, was immediately suspended due to the former spouses remarriage prior to age 55.
Child only coverage for the children resulting from their marriage was established. Approval
should be contingent upon recovery of any applicable retroactive costs.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01351
DPSIDAR states that there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the absence of a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary, effective 11 January 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01917
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 Feb 82, the applicant and his former spouse were married, and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his August 96 retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01541
DPSIAR requested the applicant provide a certified copy of the final divorce decree and/or the QDRO, which she claimed awarded SBP coverage to her following divorce. In the event the applicant provides the requested documents which prove the court awarded SBP coverage to her, absence a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming XXXXXXXXXXXXX as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00128
DPSIAR states there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the interest of justice and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to show he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on the previous reduced level of retired pay effective 31 May 2007, naming his former spouse as beneficiary. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00171
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00171 INDEX CODE: 137.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouses records be corrected to show he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence the applicant or former spouse submitted a valid SBP election to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02752
The member did not request coverage for his former spouse be terminated and the fact that SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay for over three years following their divorce are indicative of his intent to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02598
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02752
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01857
There is no indication the member submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage before 21 May 2005, as required by law. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the interest of justice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to show he elected SBP former spouse only coverage based on full retired pay effective 22 May 2004, naming his former spouse as the eligible former spouse beneficiary. ...