RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03124
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His uncharacterized entry-level separation be changed to a
general discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not lie on his application since prior to entering the Air
Force, he did not have Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of
documents extracted from his military personnel records and a
letter from the Medical Director, Trainee Health Flight.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 Oct 02, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force.
On 23 Jan 03, the applicants commander notified him that he was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous
Enlistment. The specific reason for the discharge action was the
applicant failed to meet the minimum medical standards for
enlistment based on a medical narrative summary dated 14 Jan 03,
reflecting the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
The commander advised him of his rights and on 23 Jan 03, he
acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge and, after
consulting with legal counsel, waived his right to submit a
statement in his own behalf.
The legal office reviewed the case, found it legally sufficient
to support separation, and recommended separation with an entry-
level separation.
On 31 Jan 03, the discharge authority directed the applicants
discharge with an entry-level separation. He was discharged on
4 Feb 03.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS notes the letter dated
13 Mar 03 from the Medical Director, Trainee Health Flight
stating the applicants separation from the Air Force was not an
erroneous enlistment and that he contracted Guillain-Barre
Syndrome while in basic training; however, he did not provide any
evidence of how the applicant contracted the disease. DPSOS
further notes the applicants medical records support the medical
condition existed prior to his enlisting in the Air Force.
The applicant should not have been allowed to join the Air Force
due to his medical condition. Had the Air Force known of this
condition at the time of his enlistment, he would not have been
allowed to enter military service. Although, the applicant
states he did not have Guillain-Barre Syndrome prior to enlisting
in the Air Force, his medical condition does not meet assessment
standards. Although the only documentation in the applicants
records that supports the condition existed prior to his
enlistment is the medical narrative, absent the documentation,
there is a presumption of regularity in which he was afforded due
process and the discharge was consistent with procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
Airmen are given an entry-level separation with uncharacterized
service characterization when separation is initiated with the
first 180 days of continuous active service. It was determined
by the Department of Defense (DOD) that if a member served less
than 180 days of continuous active service, it would be unfair to
the member and the service to characterize their limited service.
The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He was recently awarded a 10 percent disability rating for his
service-connected medical condition from the Department of
Veterans Affairs (DVA). The medical note from the applicants
physician indicates the applicants medical condition may have
been related to a flu shot.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the documentation
submitted by the applicant, to include the statement from the
Medical Director, Trainee Health Flight, indicating he may have
contacted Guillain-Barre Syndrome while in basis training as a
result of a flu shot, we are not persuaded that he has met his
burden of establishing the existence of an error or an injustice
with respect to the uncharacterized discharge he received. In
this respect, we note that although the only documentation in the
applicants records that supports the condition existed prior to
service is the medical narrative, dated 13 Mar 03, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, there is a presumption of regularity
in the operation of governmental affairs in which it is assumed
that all action taken was appropriate and consistent with
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation. In the applicants case, there is no indication he
was denied any rights to which entitled. To the contrary, the
evidence of record indicates upon becoming aware the applicant
had a medical condition which, if known at the time of his
accession, would have precluded his enlistment, the commander
advised him of his rights and after consulting with legal
counsel, the applicant waived his right to submit a statement in
his own behalf. In view of the above and noting DoD policy to
not characterize a members service if less than six months of
service, we do not find it appropriate to characterize his 3
months and 20 days of active service.
4. Notwithstanding the above, we do believe some form of relief
is appropriate since the applicant was diagnosed with Guillain-
Barre Syndrome shortly after entering military service. In this
respect, we note that although we did not find the letter
provided by the Medical Director, Trainee Health Flight,
sufficient to support characterizing the applicants limited
period of service, we do believe it supports a change in the
applicants narrative reason for separation. *****In this
respect, we believe that, Secretarial Authority, more accurately
reflects the circumstances surrounding his discharge and
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was
discharged on 4 February 2003 with a narrative reason for
separation of "Secretarial Authority" rather than "Failed
Medical/Physical Procurement Standards."
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-03124 in Executive Session on 26 Jul 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Aug 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 11 Apr 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jun 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00733
He was taken to a DVA Regional hospital on 28 March 2013 and was diagnosed with Guillain-Barre Syndrome. On 22 March 2013, the applicant was honorably separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request for reinstatement to active duty and to be medically discharged at the highest grade held.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01923
The February 1979, TDRL evaluation showed his Hodgkin's Disease was still in remission and he had recovered from his Guillain Barre Syndrome with only minimal evidence of any residual weakness. The BCMR Medical Consultant's complete advisory is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he elected not to reenlist because he was forced to find work while he was on the TDRL. After...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082771C070215
The applicant stated that Guillain-Barre Syndrome is a rare illness and very few facts are known about what causes the illness and no treatment or cure of the illness has been found. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It appears to the Board that the applicant was given an appropriate disability rating, which unfortunately required her separation with severance pay...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01481
The VA did not accomplish a specific neurological C&P examination for the GBS condition until 26 months after separation; it was recorded as essentially normal. The VA coded the condition as 5295-6354, lumbosacral strain and chronic fatigue syndrome, and rated it at 50% IAW VASRD §4.28, pre-stabilization, but rated given a permanent 10% rating. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00304
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00304 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Failure to complete a course of instruction) and corresponding separation code (JHF) be changed to reflect reduction in strength. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04518-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. (a) which requested comments and a recommendation regarding Petitioner's request for correction of his On 4 June 1993, the Petitioner was discharged and placed on records. placed on the TDRL with a disability rating...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00194
ND00-00194 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991123, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02726
On 9 Jan 09, the applicants commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interfered with military service (mental disorders). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence to support a change her RE code. The complete copy of AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013984
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013984 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the Purple Heart based upon the fact that he was wounded during battle while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Although the applicant contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00598
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00598 INDEX CODE: 108.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be granted a full medical retirement. Finding no evidence that her remaining conditions met the criteria for a determination of unfitness warranting consideration by the disability evaluation system, we recommend her records...