RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02988
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
2. His reenlistment (RE) code of 2B (Separated with a general or
under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge) be
changed to allow him to reenter military service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was guilty at the time of discharge of being late for work
(absent without leave (AWOL)). He believes the circumstances of
his situation were extreme and he has since taken steps to become
a better person and more responsible to those around him. He
wants his discharge upgraded and RE code changed to redeem
himself and clear his name.
In support of his application, he provides a personal statement,
character references and a MapQuest printout.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 Oct 92, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
airman, having assumed the grade effective and with a date of
rank of 12 Jun 95. He served as a still photo apprentice.
On 31 Oct 95, the applicants commander notified him that he was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct
(minor disciplinary infractions). The specific reasons for the
discharge action were he received two Article 15s, one vacation
of suspended punishment, two Letters of Reprimand and two Letters
of Counseling.
On 31 Oct 95, he acknowledged receipt of the notification of
discharge. On 14 Nov 95, the legal office reviewed the case and
recommended discharge with a general discharge without probation
and rehabilitation.
On 17 Nov 95, the discharge authority directed a general
discharge without probation and rehabilitation. He was
discharged on 28 Nov 95. He served three years, one month and
nine days of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to
believe the characterization of the service and RE code was
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly
harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. We
considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we
do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to
recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon
which to recommend granting the relief sought.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-02988 in Executive Session on 16 Nov 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jul 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02057 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His reenlistment (RE) code of 2B (Separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The applicant in support of his application submitted a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03134
He was discharged on 18 Nov 85. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. ___________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02988
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 October 2004 for review and response within 30 days. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02118
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02582
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02582 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 29 Oct 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00620
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00620 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 3K (Secretarial Authority). On 4 Nov 08, his commander notified him that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01268
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01268 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He requests his discharge be upgraded based on clemency. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00865
The applicant was discharged on 12 Oct 84. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Sep 10, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05063
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jun 12, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03565
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03565 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Although the applicant contends the AFDRB did not review the letter submitted by his ADC, dated 25 Oct 88 or his statement requesting help, according to the AFDRB Examiners...