Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02973
Original file (BC-2010-02973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02973 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His retirement be changed to a medical retirement. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He met a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB); however, he was 
returned to duty. Five months later, he was retired without 
being re-evaluated for a combat illness. Presently, airmen are 
placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and re-
evaluated for a final disposition. The PEB noted that his Post-
Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was related to exposure to 
combat while deployed in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. 
Recently, his symptoms have worsened. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF 
Physical Evaluation Board; his VA Forms 21-4138, Statement in 
Support of Claim, extracted from his medical records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 17 October 2001, the applicant was notified by Headquarters 
Air Reserve Personnel Center that he was eligible for retired pay 
at age 60 

 

On 7 February 2007, a Line of Duty Determination (LOD) was 
conducted because a civilian psychiatrist provider with the 
Veteran’s Administration (VA) diagnosed the applicant with PTSD 
directly connected to his deployment to Iraq from 19 December 
2004 until 6 May 2005. The provider did not find any evidence of 
a post-military stressor to account for current PTSD symptoms. 
The overall current affect reported by the provider evaluation 
was anxiety and mild depression. 

 

On 11 April 2007, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the 
applicant with PTSD with an approximate date of origin of 1 April 


2005 and referred him to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board 
(IPEB). 

 

On 21 April 2007, the applicant’s commander recommended to the 
IPEB that he be returned to full duty. The commander stated the 
applicant is a productive, capable member that does not appear to 
have any problems which affect his ability to return to duty. 

 

On 10 May 2007, an IPEB concluded the applicant’s medical 
condition of PTSD did not prevent him from reasonably performing 
the duties of his office, rank, or rating. The IPEB recommended 
the applicant be returned to duty. The IPEB noted the PTSD was 
related to his exposure to combat while deployed in support of 
Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. 

 

On 29 September 2007, the applicant was separated and transferred 
to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) in the grade 
of master sergeant after serving 26 years, 2 months and 27 days 
of total service for retired pay. On 24 May 2023, the applicant 
will be sixty years of age and eligible to receive retired pay 
from the Air Force Reserves. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the preponderance of 
evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the 
disability process or at the time of separation. The IPEB noted 
the applicant’s PTSD could have been an unfitting condition, but 
was not currently compensable or ratable and recommended he be 
returned to duty. By law, a member may appeal a recommended 
disposition if he/she is found unfit and being involuntarily 
separated or retired for disability; however, the applicant was 
found fit. 

 

The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPAMM deferred comments to DPSD as the point of contact for 
the IPEB decisions and the applicant’s Air Reserve Center 
component as responsible for the disposition of members returned 
to duty by the IPEB. 

 

The complete DPAMM evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant provided an article from the Disability Veterans’ 
Magazine and extracts copies of his medical records. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02973 in Executive Session on 1 June 2011, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2010-02973 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 May 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 27 Sep 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPAMM, dated 6 Oct 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 10. 

 Exhibit F. Applicant’s Response, undated 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04745

    Original file (BC-2010-04745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04745 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force (AF) Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, be changed to reflect “yes” in Section 10, Item C, Disability was the direct result of Armed Conflict or was caused by an Instrumentality of War and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01117

    Original file (BC-2012-01117.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and discharge with entitlement to disability severance pay, effective 8 September 2010, be changed to a permanent retirement with a minimum 40 percent disability rating. The DPSD complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03058

    Original file (BC-2010-03058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to a Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 25 June 2008, she was placed in a “Not Present for Duty Status” in accordance with Air Force Instruction 48-123, paragraph (A)(2) and Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon General Policy Memorandum 06-01, due to a non- duty related medical condition that required a Worldwide Duty Evaluation (WDE) and evaluation by an MEB or PEB. Further, it must be noted the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member’s condition at that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01670

    Original file (BC-2010-01670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01670 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His status be changed from non-combat related to combat related. DPSD states that a preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time his of retirement. Upon review of the narrative...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03317

    Original file (BC-2012-03317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was forced to accept the findings and recommendations of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) even though he did not agree with them. On 20 Jul 10, the applicant initialed the following statement on his AF Form 1180, Action on IPEB Finding and Recommended Disposition, “I agree with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and am waiving the right to a formal PEB hearing.” On 21 Jul 10, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04738

    Original file (BC-2010-04738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to show that he was retired for physical disabilities and provided a 100 percent combined compensable disability rating rather than medically discharged with severance pay. On 31 Aug 07, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file and recommended a combined compensable disability rating of 20 percent. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03664

    Original file (BC 2007 03664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03664 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability retirement be corrected to show that his medical condition was “the direct result of armed conflict or was caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war," or was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02760

    Original file (BC 2010 02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 29 September 2009, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from active service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02217

    Original file (BC-2012-02217.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02217 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating be changed from 0 to 30 percent and retired by reason of physical disability. The Board also noted the applicant had no rash whatsoever at that time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02217

    Original file (BC-2012-02217.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02217 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating be changed from 0 to 30 percent and retired by reason of physical disability. The Board also noted the applicant had no rash whatsoever at that time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...