Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02934
Original file (BC-2010-02934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02934 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His Airman’s Medal status be changed to read “Extraordinary” 
rather than “Ordinary.” 

 

2. He be awarded the 10 percent increase in retired pay for 
award of the Airman’s Medal. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He states it is unfortunate the awarded citation cannot 
accurately reflect everything that occurred during the incident. 
There were multiple explosions coming from the vehicle which 
made several rescue attempts futile. 

 

He was burned, suffered inhalation damage, and was traumatized. 
There has not been a day that he has not though about the man 
who burned to death because he could not save him. 

 

The term ordinary has the definition of “usual, not exceptional, 
and common place.” However, extraordinary carries the meaning 
“of beyond what is usual and exceptional in character and 
remarkable.” He believes the difference in ordinary and 
extraordinary was redefined by the rescue attempts while the 
vehicle was exploding. 

 

He was not aware the Airman’s Medal could potentially increase 
his retired pay by 10 percent. 

 

In support of the request, the applicant provides copies of his 
citation, certificate, and Special Order for award of the 
Airman’s Medal. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Available records reflect the applicant is currently serving in 
the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant. 

 

On 31 Oct 93, the applicant was awarded the Airman’s Medal for 
his heroic actions on 27 Feb 93. 

 

The Airman’s Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of 
the United States or foreign military personnel who, while 
serving in any capacity with the United States Air Force, 
distinguish themselves by heroism involving risk of life under 
conditions other than those of actual conflict with an enemy. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends deny. DPSIDR states they are unable 
to verify an injustice exists. 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
amending his Airman’s Medal to reflect extraordinary heroism. 
While the applicant believes his actions were extraordinary 
rather than ordinary, it is our opinion that the recommending 
officials were in the best position to make this determination. 
Evidence has not been provided which would lead us to believe 
that their decision was erroneous or unjust. Therefore, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of persuasive 


evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2010-02934 in Executive Session on 16 November 2010, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Aug 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 31 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02256

    Original file (BC 2011 02256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02256 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an additional increase of 10 percent in retirement pay due to extraordinary heroism in connection with the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V). AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, paragraph 3.8.1, states since extraordinary heroism is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02981

    Original file (BC-2001-02981.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02981 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a 10% increase in his retired pay (retroactive to his date of retirement) based on extraordinary heroism in connection with receiving the Airman’s Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03419

    Original file (BC-2011-03419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not realize at the time that he could receive a 10 percent increase in his retirement pay for receiving the AmnM and now humbly requests the increase. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) determines entitlement to a 10 percent increase in retirement pay for the AmnM when awarded to enlisted members for extraordinary heroism upon approval of the award. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02167

    Original file (BC-2011-02167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial since they were not provided the applicant’s military record, nor did he provide copies of the award elements and special order. We note the applicant’s request to be awarded an additional 10 percent in retired pay based on “extraordinary heroism;” however, he received the AmnM for “heroism.” In order to even be considered to receive an additional 10 percent increase in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01721

    Original file (BC-2008-01721.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his appeal, he has provided copies of his DD Form 214; Citation to Accompany the Award of the Soldier’s Medal; and General Orders Number 34, dated 31 August 1953, awarding him the Soldier’s Medal. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority determined he was entitled to a 10 percent increase in his retired pay pursuant to Section 8991 (a)(2), Title 10, United States Code, effective 1...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01034

    Original file (BC-2012-01034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the squadron followed through with the AmnM processing, the former commander would have seen and approved the awards. One of the approved citations actually states "voluntary risk of life," which is what all of their original citations read before citations were changed to the AFCM for “acts of courage.” The AFI states that the AmnM will not be awarded for "normal performance of duties." Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04457

    Original file (BC 2012 04457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not indicate that his retirement pay was considered for a 10 percent increase at the time he was awarded the Airman’s Medal. Per AFI 26-3203, Service Retirements, “Since 1979, enlisted members who have been awarded the Silver Star, the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism in a noncombat action, or the Airman’s Medal have been automatically considered for the additional 10 percent pay...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01973

    Original file (BC-2005-01973.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01973 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 February 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He retroactively receive a 10% increase in retired pay effective 1 January 1991, based on award of the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for heroism. How can anyone determine the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02772

    Original file (BC-2004-02772.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02772 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 MAR 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the additional 10% in retired pay authorized for Airman's Medal (AM) recipients. On 10 Dec 04, The Personnel Council determined that extraordinary heroism, within the meaning of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03312

    Original file (BC-2008-03312.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    MRBP states that they reviewed the applicant's request for an additional 10 percent retirement pay in December 2001 for award of the Airman's Medal and his act of heroism; however, the Board denied his request stating that it did not rise to the level to meet the criteria of "extraordinary heroism.” The applicant has not provided any new evidence in support of his request. The complete MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit...