RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02104
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2B (separated with a general or under-
other-than-honorable conditions discharge), be changed so that he
can reenlist into the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like to have a second chance to prove he deserves to be
enlisted in the military and have an outstanding career.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release
or Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS and DPSOA reviewed this application and recommends
denial. DPSOS states the applicant did not submit any evidence
or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the
discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in his
master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge
authority.
DPSOA states the applicant does not provide proof of an error or
injustice in reference to his RE code. He only states he is
asking for a second chance. The RE code of 2B is required per
Air Force Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, Chapter
3, and accurately reflects his involuntary discharge with a
general character of service.
Complete copies of the DPSOS and DPSOA evaluations are at
Exhibits C and D respectively.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 23 December 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-02104 in Executive Session on 23 February 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2010-02104:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 5 Nov 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 30 Nov 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02657 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JKN (Misconduct) be changed. DPSOS states the applicant did not provide any evidence to show that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of his discharge that would warrant a change of his separation code. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03053
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02437 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated back on active duty; or in the alternative, her reentry (RE) code of 2B {involuntarily separated with a general or under other that honorable condition (UOTHC) discharge} be changed. The applicants justification is in reference to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00435
She understands the mistakes she made as a teen and does not have time to mess up another opportunity to serve her country. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of an upgrade to her discharge. We considered upgrading her RE and separation code based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02996 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 3 Dec 86, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibits F and G).
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00479
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit F. HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant's request for a change of RE code. If the Board upgrades the applicant’s character of service to honorable his RE code would automatically change to 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10 with an honorable discharge." DPSOA will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2B, unless otherwise directed by the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04705 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow his reentry into the military. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00703
As a result, on 6 Sep 01, she was convicted by court martial for wrongful use of marijuana and wrongful introduction of marijuana onto base with the intent to distribute. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01177
DPSOA states that it does not make sense to change the applicants DD Form 214 when it reflects the correct RE code. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...