Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02095
Original file (BC-2010-02095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02095 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His Non-Obligated, Non-Participating Status in the Air Force 
Reserve be changed to inactive status. 

 

2. His Date of Rank (DOR) be modified to reflect his inactive 
status. 

 

3. His non-selection for promotion to the grade of major be 
removed from his records. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He believes it to be in the best interest of the Air Force to 
change his non-participating time to inactive. He states that by 
modifying his DOR, he will be better prepared for future 
promotions. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Air Force Reserve Officer Data Verification Brief. 

 

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from 
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. 
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this 
Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPAAR recommends denial. DPAAR states the applicant was 
transferred to the Non-Participating Individual Ready Reserve 


(IRR) on 8 Jun 04 after being discharged from active duty. 
Members in the IRR remain eligible for promotion and the 
applicant met a promotion board while assigned to the IRR, but 
was not selected. The applicant was subsequently reassigned to 
the Standby Reserve on 8 Jun 06 IAW the governing assignments 
instruction. 

 

The DPAAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 30 Jul 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-02095 in Executive Session on 1 Feb 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPAAR, dated 15 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04565

    Original file (BC-2012-04565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/CV did not make a recommendation and states that the applicant has never met a USAFR promotion board and recommended a referral to AFPC to comment on the promotion deferrals. The applicant did not meet any promotion boards during the time he served in the USAFR. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00428

    Original file (BC 2014 00428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant separated from the Regular Air Force 31 Aug 04. When he met his second Reserve promotion board and was not selected for promotion, he incurred a MSD.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02113

    Original file (BC-2011-02113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She notes that even the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Fact Sheet on the IRR does not disclose information about a Reserve officer’s promotion status and led her to believe that she would not be discharged unless she requested resignation of her commission. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force with a separation pay benefit prior to completing her MSO.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838

    Original file (BC 2013 02838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04553

    Original file (BC 2012 04553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04553 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His record be further corrected to account for his denied promotion opportunities to lieutenant colonel and colonel, in that he was not considered by promotion board for which he would have been eligible had he been accessed in the correct rank. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01783

    Original file (BC-2003-01783.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was appropriately considered and not selected by the FY03 and FY04 major boards. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we note that the applicant was considered and selected by the February 2003 Captain’s Continuation Board that enables the applicant to effectively compete for promotion to major until 31 January 2011. Consequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03417

    Original file (BC 2013 03417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was deferred for the second time and his MSD was established as 1 Mar 14. The applicant completed 24 years of commissioned service in May 08. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02534

    Original file (BC 2013 02534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02534 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to captain (O-3) be corrected and, if applicable, she be promoted to major (O-4). The applicant’s record was subsequently considered by three SSBs for promotion to captain with an earlier promotion effective date. We took note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03125

    Original file (BC-2005-03125.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03125 INDEX NUMBER: 131.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) be changed from 18 May 05 to 11 Dec 04. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05246

    Original file (BC 2013 05246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not presented any evidence to prove the board acted contrary to law or regulation, or that his record contained any errors when considered by the board. THE BOARD DETERMINES...