RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02095
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Non-Obligated, Non-Participating Status in the Air Force
Reserve be changed to inactive status.
2. His Date of Rank (DOR) be modified to reflect his inactive
status.
3. His non-selection for promotion to the grade of major be
removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes it to be in the best interest of the Air Force to
change his non-participating time to inactive. He states that by
modifying his DOR, he will be better prepared for future
promotions.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
Air Force Reserve Officer Data Verification Brief.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicants military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPAAR recommends denial. DPAAR states the applicant was
transferred to the Non-Participating Individual Ready Reserve
(IRR) on 8 Jun 04 after being discharged from active duty.
Members in the IRR remain eligible for promotion and the
applicant met a promotion board while assigned to the IRR, but
was not selected. The applicant was subsequently reassigned to
the Standby Reserve on 8 Jun 06 IAW the governing assignments
instruction.
The DPAAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 30 Jul 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-02095 in Executive Session on 1 Feb 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPAAR, dated 15 Jul 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jul 10.
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04565
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/CV did not make a recommendation and states that the applicant has never met a USAFR promotion board and recommended a referral to AFPC to comment on the promotion deferrals. The applicant did not meet any promotion boards during the time he served in the USAFR. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00428
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant separated from the Regular Air Force 31 Aug 04. When he met his second Reserve promotion board and was not selected for promotion, he incurred a MSD.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02113
She notes that even the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Fact Sheet on the IRR does not disclose information about a Reserve officers promotion status and led her to believe that she would not be discharged unless she requested resignation of her commission. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force with a separation pay benefit prior to completing her MSO.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04553
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04553 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His record be further corrected to account for his denied promotion opportunities to lieutenant colonel and colonel, in that he was not considered by promotion board for which he would have been eligible had he been accessed in the correct rank. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01783
The applicant was appropriately considered and not selected by the FY03 and FY04 major boards. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we note that the applicant was considered and selected by the February 2003 Captain’s Continuation Board that enables the applicant to effectively compete for promotion to major until 31 January 2011. Consequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03417
He was deferred for the second time and his MSD was established as 1 Mar 14. The applicant completed 24 years of commissioned service in May 08. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02534 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to captain (O-3) be corrected and, if applicable, she be promoted to major (O-4). The applicants record was subsequently considered by three SSBs for promotion to captain with an earlier promotion effective date. We took note...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03125
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03125 INDEX NUMBER: 131.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) be changed from 18 May 05 to 11 Dec 04. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05246
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not presented any evidence to prove the board acted contrary to law or regulation, or that his record contained any errors when considered by the board. THE BOARD DETERMINES...