Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01899
Original file (BC-2010-01899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01899 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She consumed a large amount of alcohol and was charged for being 
highly intoxicated and in an incoherent state; however, it was a 
one time occurrence, which she believes the Air Force overreacted 
to by discharging her. She is currently fully employed by a Rest 
care facility that takes care of the elderly and disabled. She 
quit drinking and would like her service to be characterized as 
honorable. She loved her job in the Air Force and wishes she could 
have retired. She does not argue the fact that she had an issue 
with drinking while serving in the Air Force; however, at that time 
she could have used someone to guide her who could have aided her 
in completing her military obligation, but the Air Force was quick 
to discharge her. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her DD 
Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed 
Forces of the United States, a copy of a VA Form 21-4138, Statement 
in Support of Claim, a copy of DD Form 1569, Incident/Complaint 
Report, a copy of character letters, and a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 26 Dec 84 and 
was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-
3), having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 
26 Apr 86. 

 

 

 

The applicant was notified by her commander that he was 
recommending her for discharge from the Air Force under the 


provisions of AFM 39-10, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5-46. The 
specific reasons for this action were several minor disciplinary 
infractions such as: writing checks with insufficient funds; 
failing to maintain her weight loss under the weight management 
program; for being drunk and disorderly in her dormitory; and for 
failing to go to work on time. The applicant received five letters 
of counseling, four letters of reprimand, a non-recommendation for 
promotion, and an Article 15 for her actions. After a legal review 
of the case file, the staff judge advocate found the case legally 
sufficient. She received a general discharge after serving 
2 years, 2 months, and 28 days on active duty. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, 
which is at Exhibit C. On 4 Aug 10, a copy of the FBI report was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment (Exhibit D). At 
that time, she was also invited to provide information pertaining 
to her post-service activities. As of this date, no response has 
been received by this office. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication 
the actions taken to effect the applicant’s discharge were 
improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing 
regulations in effect at the time, or the actions taken against 
her were based on factors other than her own misconduct. In 
addition, in view of the contents of the FBI Identification 
Record we are not persuaded that the characterization of the 
applicant’s discharge warrants an upgrade to honorable on the 
basis of clemency. Having found no error or injustice with 
regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a 
military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant 
favorable action on her request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 


 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01899 in Executive Session on 15 Sep 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Aug 10. 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02383

    Original file (BC-2007-02383.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding both the AFDRB and AFBCMR decisions, and the rationale of the earlier decisions, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. Subsequent to the AFBCMR decision, the applicant’s sister, having been appointed conservator of his estate, has submitted an application on behalf of her brother, requesting reconsideration. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02418

    Original file (BC-2002-02418.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 0202418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded so he can be buried in a national cemetery. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's sister...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00443

    Original file (BC-2012-00443.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00443 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The applicant’s service time was punctuated by cocaine use, which should not be rewarded by the granting of veteran’s benefits. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02905

    Original file (BC-2010-02905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02905 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from Conditions That Interfere With Military Service-Not Disability-Character and Behavior Disorder to DSM IV...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1993-02122A

    Original file (BC-1993-02122A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Sep 92, in a personal appearance, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for an honorable discharge and a changed reason for separation. He did not realize until years after his discharge that he was an alcoholic, making it impossible for him to drink in “moderation” as the Air Force had advised. Complete copies of his submissions, with attachments, are provided at Exhibit F. On 19 May 05, the AFBCMR Staff invited the applicant to submit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02160

    Original file (BC-2012-02160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. While the applicant contends her two years of service merit an honorable discharge, we find no evidence or an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. It...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02222

    Original file (BC-2011-02222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 1 June 1982 and was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 1 December 1982. The applicant responded by stating he had developed an alcohol drinking problem while in the service, but didn’t realize it at the time. ________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01499

    Original file (BC-2010-01499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 1977, after consulting with counsel, the applicant filed her request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Air Force Manual 39-12, Chapter 2, Section F. She indicated that if her request for discharge was approved, she understood it may result in her receiving a UOTHC discharge. On 23 March 1978 and 8 December 1980, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade her discharge. Furthermore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00295

    Original file (BC-2006-00295.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and she provided no facts warranting an upgrade of her discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 Feb 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02285

    Original file (BC-2011-02285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFLOA/JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial noting the statements by the applicant's psychiatrist and her recent diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder is insufficient to justify a medical basis for discharge. The Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation and Air...