RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01890
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 26 Mar 09 extension be cancelled and he be allowed to
reenlist with a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not afforded the option of a waiver to reenlist after his
technical school training to obtain the required retainability
in the Air Force.
When he was accepted for retraining, he was informed that his
new career field did not have an SRB and that his only option
was to reenlist to stay eligible for retraining. He believes he
was miscounseled by his military personnel flight.
His extension was processed for 44 months, which included the
time needed to complete his technical training plus an
additional three years of retainability.
In support of the request, the applicant provides copies of his
AF IMT Form 11411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of
Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, and an
extract from AFI 36-2110, Assignments.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 5 Jun 01. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant with a
date of rank of 1 Nov 06.
The applicant was approved for retraining on 7 Jan 09 and needed
to obtain 36 months of retainability from his retraining class
graduation date of 7 Jan 10 to keep his approved retraining.
At the time of his extension request, his date of separation
(DOS) was 6 Feb 10; however his extension on 26 Mar 09 for
36 months, established a new date DOS of 6 Feb 13.
Other relevant facts are contained in the Air Force evaluation
prepared by HQ AFPC/DPSOA, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states they believe the
applicant is confusing Rule 3 of Table 2.7, which allows first-
term airmen to receive a retainability suspense delay waiver
until they receive a three-skill level. The applicant is not a
first-term airman. Rule 1 delays are for airmen who are already
serving in the SRB skill and by being required to get the
retainability without a delay (if eligible) would be entitled to
a lesser amount than if the delay was granted. The applicant
did not have the SRB skill and was not entitled to any amount of
an SRB at the time the retainability was required.
The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 5 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2010-01890 in Executive Session on 7 December 2010, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 8 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00390 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized a Zone B, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). He enlisted in the Air Force on 15 May 01 for a period of four years. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00192
She believes had she been approved for retraining in the May/June/July 2008 timeframe, she would have extended to meet the retraining retainability requirements, went to technical school, and then reenlisted in the SRB career field. In fact, even if the applicants Mar 08 retraining could have been approved, she would not have been able to extend her enlistment, but would have to reenlist in order to obtain the required retainability. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05607
He was miscounseled when not told that he must reenlist before entering an extension, as well as, the 23 month extension was obligated service which would prevent him from reenlisting at a later time due to his high year tenure. On 31 March 2011, the applicants commander recommended approval of his request and his date of separation of 28 August 2012 was extended to 28 July 2014. While the applicant contends he was not offered the option to reenlist in March 2011 for the purpose of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04548
According to the applicants AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF)/AIR Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 25 Jun 13, the applicant requested cancellation of her 26 months extension for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in order to receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05612
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, that extension or reenlistment in Aug 2012 still would not have made the applicant eligible for the SRB because member's have to be a 3-skill level in the SRB career field at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05775
He had to extend to obtain retainability; however, he was counseled that he would be able to cancel his extension or reenlist on top of time served upon graduation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04666
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 3 year and 25 month reenlistment be changed to a 5 year reenlistment and his entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple 7.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for three years, be changed to 5 years. The applicant was not eligible to cancel his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199
AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...