RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01365
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reason and authority for discharge be changed from Physical
Disability to one that is not negative.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Background checks by potential employers have revealed him as being
diagnosed with schizophrenia. He has never been officially
diagnosed with schizophrenia, but does not qualify for certain jobs
due to this being reflected on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, which has caused him
undue hardship.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy his
DD Form 214.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 17 Jan 66.
His DD Form 214 reflects the reason and authority for his discharge
was for physical disability which existed prior to service (EPTS).
He was honorably discharged on 29 Apr 66 after serving 4 months and
14 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to identify an
arrest record on the basis of information furnished.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the
applicant's discharge was proper and in compliance with
appropriate directives. Therefore, based on the available
evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably
consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-01365 in Executive Session on 21 Sep 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Apr 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01473
The DVA denied the applicant service connected disability compensation for schizophrenia noting no evidence in his military record while he was on active duty or during the presumptive period (12 months) following discharge. The medical consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was 17 when he joined the Air Force and that he had been an athlete most...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03982 (2)
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03982 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Psychotic Disorder/ Schizophrenia, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 27 Dec 08, according to documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03982
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03982 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Psychotic Disorder/ Schizophrenia, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 27 Dec 08, according to documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01142
The MEB recommended referral to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). When the applicant was removed from the TDRL he was not entitled to a new DD Form 214 since the time spent on the TDRL was not active duty time. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that his records should be corrected to reflect that he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02570
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02570 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) for the period of 22 April 2006 through 21 April 2009. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03224
His records be corrected to reflect that his service- connected disability of Schizophrenia is combat related. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDD recommends denial, indicating the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred in...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01124C
The decision noted the treatment for anxiety in the service and the 22 May 04 opinion of a DVA examination that concluded the applicant suffered from schizophrenia either during his military service or, more likely, in the year following military service in 1976. In a DD Form 149 dated 2 Sep 04, the applicant requested reconsideration, and submitted his 100% DVA rating for service- connected schizophrenia, 24 years after his discharge from the Air Force. The Consultant provided additional...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00372
The separation medical examination completed at the time of his administrative discharge indicates he was examined by mental health providers and it was determined there was no mental condition that warranted disability evaluation or impaired his ability to know right from wrong and adhere to right. The fact that applicant has been granted service connected disability from the DVA does not entitle him to Air Force disability compensation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01921 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: Ms. Marcia B. Delaree HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to reflect that he was discharged for medical reasons. He was treated for various medical conditions throughout his military career; however, his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01365
DPPAE states the Air Staff announced release of the SRB list on 29 Mar 04, that would go into effect on 30 Mar 04. There is no way the Military Personnel Flight could have advised the applicant to wait until 30 Mar 04 to reenlist because no one knew when the Air Staff would release the new list. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...