RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01361
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was separated on 12 Aug 07
rather than 11 Aug 07, and that he served four years and one day
of active service rather than four years.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His DD Form 214 is incorrect and deprives him the right to
receive 01-E (Officer with over four years enlisted service)
special pay. Since he reenlisted during the third year of his
enlistment, and his class did not start until 27 Aug 07, there
was no need for him to be separated at the four year point. Top
members of his chain of command vigorously proofread his
application which reflected the proper separation date.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits copies of his
DD Form 214, AF IMT 56, Application and Evaluation for Training
Leading to a Commission in the United States Air Force, and an
Enlisted Commissioning Program Return Letter.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records reflect that he
enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 Aug 03 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman. On
6 Oct 06, he submitted an application to participate in an
Enlisted Commissioning Program. His application was approved
and he was assigned a class start date of 27 Aug 07.
On 11 Aug 07, he was discharged to enter the Scholarships for
Outstanding Airman to Reserve Officer Training Corp (SOAR)
Program. He entered the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp
(ROTC) Program on 12 Oct 07, and on 28 Aug 09, he completed the
program, and was commissioned a second lieutenant.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states there is no evidence
to support the applicant should have been separated on
12 Aug 07. His records indicate he separated on the completion
of his contractual obligation as correctly reflected on his
DD Form 214.
The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. DPSIPV indicates there is no
error associated with the applicants service dates or the
amount of service reflected on his DD Form 214. He only served
four years of service and does not qualify for the special rate
of basic pay.
The complete AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 22 Oct 10, for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The
applicant's complete submission was thoroughly reviewed and his
contentions were duly noted. However, we agree with the
opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01361 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 10, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Apr 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 17 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 29 Sep 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Oct 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01904 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant’s request is not clear; however, it appears he is requesting that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Parachutist Badge. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02843
On 9 Aug 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to report for duty at the appointed place and time. d. On 15 Sep 82, he received an LOC for failing to adequately support his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04395
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Therefore, we believe the applicants records should be corrected as indicated below. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03684
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s DOR was originally established incorrectly by AFPC and corrected in accordance with the provisions of AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank. An audit of officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03120
She provided no facts warranting changing the narrative reason for separation to “fulfillment of service” or a change to her RE code. Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03546
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she entered the Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) on 14 Sep 81 per Directive Number 974 (Docket No. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00881
They found no evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of the applicant's discharge action. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial of the applicants request for reinstatement and service credit, noting the applicant was involuntarily discharged with 1 year, 5 months, and 11 days of active service, after being diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder. The complete AF/A1DLV evaluation is at Exhibit F. AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.