Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00790
Original file (BC-2010-00790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to a “1” code that would 
allow him to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He desires to reenlist and would like a second chance to prove he 
is worthy to serve his country. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 May 2008. 

 

On 29 August 2008, the applicant was notified by his commander of 
his intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force 
under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 
5.14. The specific reason was a Chronological Record of Medical 
Care form, dated 30 July 2008, which states the applicant was 
diagnosed with Migraines. 

 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged 
receipt of the notification on that same date. The applicant 
waived his right to consult with counsel and elected not to 
submit statements on his own behalf. 

 

In a legal review of the case file, the assistant staff judge 
advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended 
discharge. On 18 September 2008, the discharge authority 
concurred with the recommendations and directed an entry level 
separation. The applicant was discharged on 22 September 2008. 
He served 4 months and 17 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends denial. SGPS states that the applicant’s 
condition existed prior to him entering the service and was not 
disclosed to the MEPS CMO. He was seen at the Trainee Health 
Clinic and by neurology and was diagnosed with migraine 
headaches. He declined an AETC waiver review and was separated. 
The separation was done in accordance with established policy and 
administrative procedures. 

 

The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 30 July 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D). As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that 
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air 
Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not 
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a 
change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted. 
Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 


 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00790 in Executive Session on 30 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00790 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 February 2010, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 7 June 2010. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 July 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00532

    Original file (BC-2010-00532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military physician indicated if his condition resolved, he could reapply for enlistment. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432

    Original file (BC-2010-04432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04520

    Original file (BC-2011-04520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04520 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code “4C” “Approved Involuntary Separation for Concealment /Physical Standards/Less than 9.0 RGL,” be changed in order for him to reenlist in the Armed Forces. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02816

    Original file (BC 2013 02816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code which would allow her to reenlist. This condition existed prior to her entering...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01073

    Original file (BC 2009 01073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01073 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of “2C” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service” be changed to a code that allows him to reenlist in the Air Force. The medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01073

    Original file (BC-2009-01073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01073 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of “2C” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service” be changed to a code that allows him to reenlist in the Air Force. The medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01870

    Original file (BC-2011-01870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 September 2008, his commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section C, Defective Enlistment. The applicant was discharged effective 26 September 2008, with an entry-level separation, “Uncharacterized” character of service and was credited with 3 months and 18 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01853

    Original file (BC-2011-01853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, his condition did render him unsuitable to continue military service; however, presently they support a change to his RE code. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was informed that the board has concurred to change his narrative reason for separation and will only consider changing his RE code to 3K. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514

    Original file (BC-2011-02514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code “JDA,” “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and Re-entry (RE) code of “2C,” Approved Honorable...