Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00470
Original file (BC-2010-00470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00470 

 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 

  COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be relieved of the obligation to repay the Selective 
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

At the time he applied the Military Training Instructor (MTI) 
duty, the regulations, allowed members to receive their SRB if 
they reenlisted prior to applying for the SDI. He reenlisted on 
27 September 2008 and applied for MTI duty in March 2009, upon 
completion of his application, there was no mention of forfeiture 
of the SRB. He will return to the Security Forces career field 
(3P0X1) in fiscal year 2010 and will perform the exact duties for 
which he received the SRB. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
MTI application, his AF IMT 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex 
to DD Form 4, DD Form 4/1, Enlistment Document Armed Forces of 
the United States; extract copies from continuity book and 
special duty assignment application. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 6 December 
2002. The applicant reenlisted on 27 September 2008, for four 
years with entitlement to a Zone A, Multiple 1.0 bonus, based on 
four years of continued service. 

 

He had previously signed AF Form 901 on 24 September 2008, 
certifying in Section D that he understood and agreed to the 
conditions which might (1) terminate his continued entitlement to 
unpaid bonus installments and (2) cause a portion of advance 
bonus payments to be recouped or terminated. On 17 February 
2009, the applicant applied for MTI. The applicant was approved 
for a Special Duty Assignment in May 2009. 


 

In June 2009, the Air Staff completed an audit of the SRB 
recipients and identified the applicant and many others as being 
ineligible for a SRB because he did not complete the duties in 
the SRB career field. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states while there was an 
initial mistake made by not recouping the SRB immediately upon 
approval of the Special Duty, they find no evidence that supports 
the applicant receiving an SRB he is not entitled. While the 
applicant submits a copy of a regulation, which appears to be a 
page out of an old continuity book, the front cover would have 
stated AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, dated 21 November 
2001, is the valid policy. AFI 36-2606 states airmen must 
complete the full term of enlistment or extension of enlistment 
in the SRB skill; failure to do so may result in termination and 
recoupment. 

 

While the applicant states he is returning to the Security Forces 
career field, his records indicate he has had recent disciplinary 
issues that may require his removal from the Special Duty. 
Presently, there is no evidence or projection for him to return 
to the Security Forces career field in his records. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 24 March 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. (Exhibit C) 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting partial 
relief. In this respect, the applicant contends he was 
miscounseled into believing he was authorized a SRB. While the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) finds no error 
or injustice that would entitle him to the SRB, we disagree. The 


OPR acknowledges that a mistake was made leading to the payment 
and recoupment of the unauthorized SRB. We believe the applicant 
made his decision to reenlist with the intent of receiving the 
bonus in good faith based upon the guidance he received. 
Accordingly, it is our opinion the applicant has established 
reasonable doubt as to whether or not he was properly counseled, 
and it is our belief that any doubt in this matter should be 
resolved in his favor. While the Board Majority recommends the 
applicants records be corrected to show he was entitled to an SRB 
for the months he served in the qualifying AFSC, this may not 
constitute the sum of the total relief he seeks; however, we 
believe correcting the records in this manner provides the 
applicant full and fitting relief. In view of the above, the 
Board Majority recommends his records be corrected as indicated 
below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was 
authorized, by competent authority, as an exception to policy, to 
receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 7 months he 
served in the 3P0X1 Air Force specialty in conjunction with his 
27 September 2008 reenlistment. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00470 in Executive Session on 23 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

By a majority vote, the Board voted to grant the applicant’s 
request. XXX voted that no recoupment action should be 
made for the portion of the SRB already paid to the applicant, 
but did not desire to submit a minority report. The following 
documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Feb 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Mar 10. 

 


 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00452

    Original file (BC-2010-00452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00452 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Recoupment of his initial payment of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be stopped. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00465

    Original file (BC-2010-00465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, they find no evidence that supports the applicant receiving an SRB he is not entitled to, when many other Air Force members will not receive the SRB, even though the same circumstances apply to them with the exception of the initial mistake. In view of the above, the Board recommends his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01559

    Original file (BC-2010-01559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01559 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) debt be stopped and removed from the time he was selected as a Military Training Leader (MTL). He found out that the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) had sent him a letter; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01898

    Original file (BC-2006-01898.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01898 INDEX CODE: 128.05 BRIAN J. HIPOL COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 December 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Recoupment of his unearned Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. Since the applicant separated before completing the time agreed to serve, recoupment was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03879

    Original file (BC-2011-03879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) reenlistment office altered his DD Form 4/1 to reflect 8 Oct 2007 instead of the date he reenlisted (1 Oct 2007). The problem was the applicant's DOS/ETS was 7 Dec 2011 in DFAS system and 7 Jan 2012 in MILPDS (which coincides with the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment for four years and three months); the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment date was verified from his contract located in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199

    Original file (BC-2005-01199.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677

    Original file (BC-2005-01677.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03105

    Original file (BC 2014 03105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Then she found out she had been miscounseled and had actually been eligible to reenlist in Jun 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends partially granting, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00485

    Original file (BC-2008-00485.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, after meeting the requirements of his contract and submitting his request for the bonus through his Military Personnel Flight (MPF), the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) denied his request and would not honor his contract citing that in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2606, he was not entitled to receive a bonus even though his contract stated he was. He should receive the SRB indicated in his reenlistment contract even though the Air Force is denying payment due to their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00122

    Original file (BC 2009 00122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) is 3P0X1 – Security Forces. According to records on file with Air Force Retraining, the applicant was number 1 out of 180 (involuntary phase) SSgts identified as vulnerable for involuntary retraining into 180 quotas. The applicant was aware of the program requirements, but failed to submit the application as required and instructed.