Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00159
Original file (BC-2010-00159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00159 

 INDEX CODE: 107.00 

 

 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His score qualifies him for the award. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AF Form 522, Qualification Score Card. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Aug 60 for 
a period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the 
grade of airman first class (A1C/E-4). 

 

He was honorably released under the provisions of AFR 39-14, on 
7 Aug 64, with a reason of expiration term of service (ETS). He 
was credited with 3 years, 11 months and 28 days of active duty 
service, including 1 year, 10 months, and 29 days of foreign 
service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant 
did not score high enough to qualify as an expert. The 
applicant provided an AF Form 522, dated 15 Jan 64, which noted 
his score of 267, qualifying him as a sharpshooter. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 


 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 9 Apr 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00159 in Executive Session on 15 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jan 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 15 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Apr 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00813

    Original file (BC-2011-00813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSIDR has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the PUC, AFOUA w/V, the RVNGC w/P, and the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS). His DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to include these awards. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00813 in Executive Session on 2 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00190

    Original file (BC-2008-00190.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was court-martialed for drug use and did not complete his full military service; therefore, he is not entitled to this award. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 21 Mar 08, the applicant states he requested the SAEMR based on his qualifications in firing expert on the M-16 rifle during technical school. Novel, Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00163

    Original file (BC-2010-00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the appropriate awards and foreign service time. Only members of the armed forces of the United States who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01826

    Original file (BC-2012-01826.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for entitlement to the SAEMR and an additional AFOUA. However, DPSIDR was unable to verify any additional units the applicant served with that were awarded the AFOUA during the applicant’s tenure with those units. We note DPSIDR has verified the applicant’s 2 entitlement to the basic AFOUA and will correct the applicant’s record to reflect this medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05626

    Original file (BC-2012-05626.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05626 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record they were unable to verify any additional awards he may have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03485

    Original file (BC-2006-03485.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03485 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflect award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01005

    Original file (BC-2009-01005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01005 INDEX CODE: 107.00 ----------- COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), a Vietnam Service Award, and any other awards that he earned and did not receive. In view of this, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04645

    Original file (BC 2013 04645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s submission or his military personnel records that indicates he was assigned to a unit that earned the PUC. The AFOR-LT was authorized on 12 Oct 80, to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the PUC, indicating there is no evidence he was assigned to a unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03366

    Original file (BC-2010-03366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03366 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His entitlement to the requested corrections can be verified by reviewing his official military personnel file. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03018

    Original file (BC-2008-03018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Sep 08, HQ AFPC/DPSITE informed the applicant that block 15a of his DD Form 214 pertains to individuals entering active duty under the Veterans’ Education Assistance program (VEAP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR...