RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01531
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code of 2C (Involuntary separation with honorable discharge) be
changed to a waiverable code.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has learned from his mistakes and would like to serve his country again.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 23 Jan 03, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman.
Between 31 Oct 06 and 18 Aug 07, the applicant twice misused his government
travel card. For these infractions, he received two Article 15s,
respectively, and was ultimately reduced in rank to the grade of airman.
An AETC IMA 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action, dated 1 Oct 07,
indicates the commander recommended he be disenrolled from aviation
training in accordance with AFI 11-402, Aviation and Parachutist Service,
Aeronautical Ratings and Badges.
A resume of his Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) follows:
Close-out Date Overall Rating
22 Sep 04 3
20 May 05 3
31 Jan 06 5
+31 Jan 07 3
+Referral Report
On 20 Dec 07, the applicant was honorably discharged for misconduct (minor
infractions). He served 4 years, 10 months and 28 days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states there is a presumption of
regularity in which the applicant was afforded due process and the
discharge was consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of
the discharge instruction. His reentry code was properly established.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 8
Jan 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In
the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2009-01531 in
Executive Session on 18 Mar 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 May 09.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 16 Dec 09.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 23 Dec 09.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Jan 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01103
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct and she has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested changes to her discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C-Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without service characterization be changed to allow him to enlist in the National Guard. The HQ AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01317
DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include his characterization of service and RE code, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01530
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. On 27 Sep 07, the applicant requested his separation from the Air Force because he had “no motivation to stay in the Air Force and it would be a waste of government...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02843
On 9 Aug 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to report for duty at the appointed place and time. d. On 15 Sep 82, he received an LOC for failing to adequately support his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02466
On 14 Dec 05, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions. On 7 Dec 10, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for upgrade of his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. RE Code 2B, is required per AFI 36-2606,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02696
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition (Graves Disease and Hyperthyroidism) prior to his discharge that the Air Force never treated him for nor followed-up on. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, and copies of his service and medical records. After considering the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and the BCMR Medical Consultant,...