Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01468
Original file (BC-2009-01468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01468 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her records be changed to reflect a reenlistment eligibility (RE) 
code of 3K (Secretarial Authority), rather than 2C (Involuntarily 
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation 
without characterization of service), so she may reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She was discharged for back pain and scoliosis. Three orthopedic 
specialists have subsequently found her able to perform any 
physical activity without any duress, strain, discomfort, or pain. 
She was not diagnosed by the Air Force with any other 
disqualifying condition that would prohibit her reenlisting. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, reports from three orthopedic specialists, a copy of 
her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, and a discharge letter of notification. 

 

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Applicant began her military service on 10 Jun 08. She sought 
medical care on 23 Jun 08 for back pain. Scoliosis diagnosed 
during her childhood was thought to be contributory to her back 
pain issue. Despite aggressive therapy, including rest, narcotic 
pain medicines and physical therapy, she reported little to no 
relief which eventually led to her separation from active duty on 
22 Jul 08. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends denial. SGPS states, based on the medical 
evidence supplied by the applicant, the original decision to 
separate her was appropriate. Her medical records document that 
her symptoms existed prior to her enlistment. Based on the 
severity of her back pain and the negligible response to 
aggressive treatment at the time and despite her presentation of 
orthopedic opinions, SGPS does not support her reenlistment as the 


chance of recurrence under the stress of military conditions is 
felt to be too great. 

 

SGPS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA could support her rescreening 
if AETC/SGPS had recommended it. However, the absence of SGPS 
support coupled with a lack of supporting evidence indicating an 
error or injustice occurred during her separation, DPSOA states 
the RE code of 2C is appropriate based on her entry level 
separation with uncharacterized service. 

 

DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 11 Dec 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
AETC/SGPS and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought 
in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2009-01468 in Executive Session on 2 February 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 


 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Apr 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 29 Sep 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 5 Nov 09. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Dec 09. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01532

    Original file (BC-2009-01532.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her codes are unjust because she was told several times that her knee injury was not going to heal and she may have to go before a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for discharge. On 1 Aug 07, her commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from military service for Erroneous Enlistment. Although she was on active duty for 18 months, her medical records clearly reflect her symptoms first presented well within the first 180 days of military service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01790

    Original file (BC 2013 01790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 Apr 08, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service with a narrative reason for separation of “Erroneous Entry (OTHER),” and an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service). In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, chapter 5, the RE code 2C is required based on the entry-level separation with uncharacterized service and the applicant does not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02261

    Original file (BC 2013 02261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Apr 2008, the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation and an “uncharacterized” character of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700

    Original file (BC-2011-04700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03351

    Original file (BC-2012-03351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the physician’s findings, the applicant was notified by her commander of his intent to recommend her for an uncharacterized entry-level separation based on fraudulent entry, under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15 under Basis for Discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02296

    Original file (BC-2011-02296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02816

    Original file (BC 2013 02816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code which would allow her to reenlist. This condition existed prior to her entering...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01073

    Original file (BC 2009 01073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01073 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of “2C” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service” be changed to a code that allows him to reenlist in the Air Force. The medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01073

    Original file (BC-2009-01073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01073 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of “2C” which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service” be changed to a code that allows him to reenlist in the Air Force. The medical...