Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00422
Original file (BC-2009-00422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00422 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code "2Q - Personnel medically retired or 
discharged" be changed to allow him to renter military service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While in basic training he injured his foot. He was told it 
would take six months or more to heal. His foot is better and 
now he would like to reenter military service. 

 

In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal 
from the Armed Forces of the United States and a letter from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 18 Apr 06, the applicant contracted his initial enlistment in 
the Regular Air Force. 

 

The applicant while in basic military training (BMT) sought 
medical care on 26 Apr 06 with complaints of numbness and 
decreased dorsiflexion of his left foot. On 24 May 06, the 
neurologist diagnosed him with Nerve Palsy of his common peroneal 
nerve and recommended physical therapy for one month. After 
months of therapy and no improvement of his condition, it was 
determined that he undergo a medical evaluation Board (MEB). 

 

On 14 Sep 06, the applicant underwent a MEB and his case was 
referred to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) On 
29 Sep 06, the IPEB recommended discharge with severance pay with 
a 10 percent disability rating and the applicant concurred. 

 


He was discharged on 4 Oct 06. He served 5 months and 17 days on 
active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends approval. SGPS states a review of his 
records and the documentation submitted supports changing the RE 
code to allow reentry into military service; however, this does 
not constitute a medical waiver. The applicant will have to 
undergo an entrance physical at the military entrance processing 
station. 

 

The AETC/SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
31 Jul 09 for review and comments within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The AFBCMR Medical Consultant concurs with the findings of 
AETC/SGPS to change the applicant’s RE code to allow him the 
opportunity to apply for re-entry into military service. The 
Medical Consultant states the applicant has provided sufficient 
documentation of treatment and recovery to support a change in 
his separation code. 

 

The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit 
E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant 28 Oct 09 for review and comments within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 


 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. After reviewing the 
evidence of record, we concur with the findings and 
recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that the applicant has provided 
sufficient documentation showing treatment and full recovery of 
his injury, which warrants a change in the applicant’s RE code to 
allow him to apply for reentry to military service. Whether or 
not he is successful will depend on the needs of the service and 
our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be allowed 
to return to military service. Therefore, we recommend his 
records be corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of 
his discharge on 23 February 2008, he was issued a Reentry (RE) 
Code of “3K.” 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00422 in Executive Session on 9 Dec 09 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2009-00422 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jan 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 1 Jul 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Jul 09. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 

 23 Oct 09. 

 Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 09. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 


AFBCMR BC-2009-00422 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 

 

 Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction 
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A 
Stat 116) it is directed that: 

 

 The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to be corrected to 
show that at the time of his discharge on 4 October 2006, he was issued a Reentry (RE) Code of 
“3K.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078

    Original file (BC-2010-01078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “4C” RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00936

    Original file (BC-2009-00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00936

    Original file (BC 2009 00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that reflects his current medical condition, allowing him to be eligible to reenlist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00631

    Original file (BC-2009-00631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00631 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation be upgraded to a honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and the recommendations of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01218

    Original file (BC-2011-01218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from failed medical/physical procurement standards to medical/service connected disability. In view of his evaluation coupled with the recommendations of AETC/SG and the BCMR Medical Consultant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03779

    Original file (BC 2013 03779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03779 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry code (RE) of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to an RE code in the 1 series to allow immediate reenlistment. On 29 September 2011, the applicant underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and received a diagnosis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406

    Original file (BC-2011-00406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicant’s RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01468

    Original file (BC-2009-01468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She sought medical care on 23 Jun 08 for back pain. Based on the severity of her back pain and the negligible response to aggressive treatment at the time and despite her presentation of orthopedic opinions, SGPS does not support her reenlistment as the chance of recurrence under the stress of military conditions is felt to be too great. SGPS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00422

    Original file (BC-2010-00422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    From his time in basic training, he actually experienced repeated symptoms of asthma and had a thorough examination by Pulmonary/Allergy specialists. Based upon the applicant’s failure to disclose his prior service medical condition, his commander recommended an entry level separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03692

    Original file (BC 2012 03692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry in Military Service) along with the corresponding Separation (SPD) code of “JDA” be changed to an “Erroneous Entry.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...