RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03234
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was denied promotion, reduced in rank and fined over $300 for his first
Article 15. During the same time period, another airman was charged with
Driving while Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol. However, he only
received a “slap on the wrist” because he and the commander were the same
race.
He requested a discharge from military service after his first incident;
however, his request was not processed and he was moved around for another
year.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 293,
Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United
States; his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty; certificates of appreciation and awards, and character reference
letters.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Sep 82 in the grade of
airman basic. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman having
assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 2 Mar 83.
On 23 Mar 84, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of
AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47b, due to a pattern of misconduct.
The specific reasons for his actions were Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for
damaging government property and failure to go; Letters of Reprimand (LORs)
for damaging government property and failing a dorm inspection; Memorandums
for Record (MFRs) for being absent from scheduled training, delinquent
charge accounts, and being drunk on station. He also received two Article
15s for disobeying a lawful order and an Article 15 for testing positive
for use of marijuana.
He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged receipt of the
notification on the same date. On 3 May 84, he requested a hearing before
an administrative discharge board.
On 22 Jun 84, the board agreed with the findings and recommendations of the
applicant’s commander. In a legal review of the case file, the assistant
staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended
discharge. On 30 Aug 84, the discharge authority concurred with the
recommendations and directed the applicant be issued an under other than
honorable conditions discharge without probation and rehabilitation.
Applicant was discharged on 12 Sep 84. He served 2 years and 11 days on
active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. On 5
Jan 09, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review
and comment within 30 days. In addition, the applicant was invited to
provide post-service information (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR POST-SERVICE AND FBI REPORT:
Applicant states the FBI was unable to associate dispositions with the
charges because he is bipolar. His problems occur only when his medication
does not take affect (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no
evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge
processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The
applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the
characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the
governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses
committed. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency;
however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us
to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend granting the relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 3 March 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Keith N. Eden, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered under AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2008-03234:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Sep 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Oct 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03301
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03301 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 Oct 78, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03041
On 23 Apr 84, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for failure in Drug Abuse Rehabilitation. On 24 Jun 83, he was entered into the drug rehabilitation program because his urine sample he submitted on 21 Apr 83 tested positive for marijuana. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. On 1 Nov 07, the Board staff forwarded the applicant a copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00537
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 18 Jan 82. DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03103
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03103 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His characterization of service be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03698
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices during the discharge processing warranting a change in his RE code. The complete HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 12 Jan 07 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit F). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00865
The applicant was discharged on 12 Oct 84. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Sep 10, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00137
He has not used marijuana or any other drug since he was discharged. (Exhibit C) ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Based on the evidence of record, we cannot conclude that clemency is warranted.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03499
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03499 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 May 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1988 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The recommendation was approved on 7 Dec 88.] Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00158
The commander stated the following reasons for the proposed discharge: a. On 20 November 1957, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic (E-1) under the provisions of AFR 39-17, paragraph 4c, with a UOTHC service characterization. In response to our request, the applicant provided post-service information which is attached at Exhibit E. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03121
On 19 Jun 84, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. c. On 19 Apr 84, he received an Article 15 for striking another airman on 7 Apr 84 and failure to go on 11 Apr 84. d. On 14 Jun 84, he received an Article 15 for wrongfully possessing marijuana. The command and base legal office reviewed the case and recommended accepting the unconditional waiver and discharge with an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation.