Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02475
Original file (BC-2008-02475.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02475
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL: NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under  honorable  conditions  (general)  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He consented to a search of his vehicle due to  an  investigation  involving
marijuana use.  He received disciplinary  action  because  marijuana  seeds,
which were not his, were found in his car.   After  numerous  complaints  to
the commanding officer he opted to sign papers for discharge.

Applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 24 Jun 71,  the  applicant  contracted  his  initial  enlistment  in  the
Regular Air Force.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  airman
first class having assumed the grade effective and with a date of rank of  1
Feb 72.

On  3  May  73,  the  applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that   he   was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force under the  provisions  of  Air
Force Manual (AFM) 39-12 for apathy and defective  attitude.   The  specific
reasons for the discharge action were:

      a.    On or about 6 Apr 73, he wrongfully possessed marijuana.

      b.    He received a Letter of Reprimand for failing to obey  a  lawful
order.

      c.    On or about 3 May 73, he failed to go to his appointed place  of
duty.

      d.    His supervisor counseled him on several occasions regarding  his
poor work performance and his tardiness.

His commander advised him of his rights in this matter.

The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and after  consulting
with legal counsel waived his  right  to  submit  a  statement  in  his  own
behalf.

On 21 May 73, the staff judge  advocate  reviewed  the  case  and  found  it
legally  sufficient  to  support  separation  and  recommended   a   general
discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

On 22 May 73, the discharge authority  directed  discharge  with  a  general
discharge.

The applicant was discharged on 24 May 73.  He served 1 year, 11 months  and
1 day on active duty.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C.

On 4 Aug 08, the Board staff requested the applicant  provide  documentation
regarding his activities since leaving  military  service  and  forwarded  a
copy of the investigative report to him for his review and  response  within
30 days.  As of this date no response has been received.  The  Investigative
Report was returned as undeliverable (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  find  no
evidence  of  an  error  or  injustice  that  occurred  in   the   discharge
processing.  Based on the available  evidence  of  record,  it  appears  the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the  discharge
regulation  and  within  the  commander's  discretionary   authority.    The
applicant has provided no evidence  which  would  lead  us  to  believe  the
characterization of the service  was  contrary  to  the  provisions  of  the
governing regulation, unduly harsh,  or  disproportionate  to  the  offenses
committed.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,  we  find
no basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
02475 in Executive Session on 16 Sep 08 under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
                       Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 08, w/atch.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  FBI Investigative Report.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Aug 08.




                             JOSEPH D. YOUNT
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00438

    Original file (BC-2008-00438.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00438 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant was discharged on 8 May 80. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00793

    Original file (BC-2008-00793.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00793 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02580

    Original file (BC-2007-02580.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Sep 84, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force (AF) for misconduct. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. On 14 Sep 07, the Board staff forwarded the applicant a copy of his FBI report for review and comment within 30 days. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04303

    Original file (BC-2008-04303.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04303 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Mar 85, the squadron commander notified the applicant of administrative discharge board (ADB) action for minor disciplinary infractions,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00367

    Original file (BC-2005-00367.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00367 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 AUG 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 16 May 74, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived his right to a hearing before...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02829

    Original file (BC-2007-02829.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Since that time he has felt remorse for any wrong doing and has considered himself very patriotic, loyal to the Air Force and proud of his service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03126

    Original file (BC-2008-03126.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03126 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded and his Reentry (RE) code of 2B (involuntarily separated under AFR 39- 10, with a general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01505

    Original file (BC-2009-01505.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Sep 94, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. On 29 Jun 09, the applicant provided a personal statement, a character reference letter, and excerpts from his military personnel records (Exhibit E). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03121

    Original file (BC-2008-03121.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 Jun 84, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. c. On 19 Apr 84, he received an Article 15 for striking another airman on 7 Apr 84 and failure to go on 11 Apr 84. d. On 14 Jun 84, he received an Article 15 for wrongfully possessing marijuana. The command and base legal office reviewed the case and recommended accepting the unconditional waiver and discharge with an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01472

    Original file (BC-2008-01472.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01472 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 20 Dec 88, the applicant appealed to the AFDRB to have his UOTHC discharge upgraded to honorable. The AFDRB considered the evidence...