RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01472
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to
an honorable discharge.
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is not an undesirable person deserving of a less than an honorable
discharge. His discharge has hurt his civilian life and it has been more
than 15 years. He is married and has raised six kids. He had an
opportunity to appear before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)
but was unable to because he had a job interview. He went to the interview
since he had a wife and children depending on him. He was willing to give
his life for his country like many of the young men and women of today.
Since his time in the military many things have happened, wars and 9/11 and
most of the people on the previous Board have probably retired. He is now
appealing to a new breed of military people. He is sorry for the mistake
he made over 21 years ago and is asking the Board to look at his records
again and upgrade his discharge to honorable.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a personal statement,
character references and an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs (IDVA)
Form 200.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Mar 73, the applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular
Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of technical
sergeant having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1
Jan 86.
On 9 Dec 86, one charge was preferred against the applicant for wrongful
introduction of a controlled substance on a military installation. Special
court-martial charges were preferred on 11 Dec 86.
On 11 Dec 86, the applicant submitted a request for discharge in lieu of
court-martial. His commander recommended the request for discharge be
approved and he receive a UOTHC discharge.
On 23 Dec 86, the staff judge advocate reviewed the case and found it
legally sufficient to support separation, recommended the request for
discharge in lieu of court-martial be accepted and that he receive a UOTHC
discharge.
The base commander and legal office reviewed the request for discharge and
recommended approval, with a UOTHC discharge.
On 24 Jan 87, the discharge authority approved the request for discharge
with a UOTHC discharge.
The applicant was discharged on 23 Feb 87. He served 13 years, 11 months
and 23 days on active duty.
On 20 Dec 88, the applicant appealed to the AFDRB to have his UOTHC
discharge upgraded to honorable. The AFDRB considered the evidence of
record and concluded that the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge authority, that
the applicant was provided full administrative due process, and that no
legal or equitable basis existed for an upgrade of the applicant’s
discharge.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C.
On 23 Jun 08, the Investigative Report was forwarded to the applicant for
review and response within 30 days. On 1 Jul 08, the Investigative Report
was returned as undeliverable (Exhibit D).
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no
evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge
processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The
applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the
characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the
governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses
committed. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency;
however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us
to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend granting the relief sought.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-
01472 in Executive Session on 8 Aug 08 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report, dated 19 May 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 23 Jun 08.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03317
On 12 Jan 83, applicant’s squadron commander recommended his request for discharge be approved and recommended a general discharge. On 8 May 83, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his under other than honorable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 22 Oct 85, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00028
On 30 January 1964, he appeared before a board of officers and the findings and recommendation was to separate him with an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge. The base legal services reviewed the report from the board of officers and found it legally sufficient to support the findings and recommendation to discharge him with an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge. On 8 April 1964, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01168
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01168
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00203
The applicant was discharged on 21 Feb 86. On 16 Dec 87, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 21 February 1986, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05603
Before recommending discharge the commander noted he reviewed the applicants records. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, after considering his overall record of service, the infractions which led to his administrative separation and the lack of post-service information we are not persuaded that an upgrade is warranted on that basis. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03393
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03393 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 MAY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Punishment imposed consisted of reduction to the grade of airman, and forfeiture of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03845
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03845 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B (Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10, with a general discharge) be changed to one that would allow his entry into another branch of military service. On 25 Sep 87, the proposed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00454
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and indicated that there was no documentation in applicant’s master personnel records relating to the reason for discharge or the discharge process. We find no evidence of error in this case and after...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00157
In support of his appeal, he has provided copies of two VA Form 21-4138s, Statement in Support of Claim, a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, two letters from the American Legion submitting his application, a personal statement, his DD Form 214, his rebuttal to his discharge, the reverse side of an Airman Performance Report (APR) with comments and signatures dated 28 December 1984, a letter from the discharge authority directing...