Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-02569
Original file (BC-2008-02569.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-02569
            INDEX CODE:  137.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her late husband's records be corrected  to  show  that  he  elected  spouse
coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) program.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In Feb 93, her husband completed the DD Form  2618,  Survivor  Benefit  Plan
(SBP) Open Enrollment Election requesting premium payments to begin  in  Mar
93.  The form was mailed “certified” to the Defense Finance  and  Accounting
Service-Denver, CO, (DFAS-DE) and certified received on 16 Feb 93;  however,
it appears the request was never processed.

In support  of  the  application,  she  submits  a  copy  of  the  SBP  Open
Enrollment Election form,  the certified receipts,  the  “Afterburner,”  the
premium schedule, and her spouse’s death certificate.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant and military service member were married on 26  Sep  59.   The
service member elected child only RSFPP prior to his  retirement  on  1  Sep
67.  He did not elect SBP coverage for his spouse after it was enacted,  nor
did he make an election during the open enrollment authorized by  PL  97-35.
His record contains a copy of a 28 Apr 93 letter from DFAS-DE advising  him,
among other  things,  that  the  12  Feb  93  open  enrollment  election  he
submitted was “invalid” because block 10 did not indicate  the  base  amount
upon which he wished to establish coverage.  Open  enrollment  ended  on  31
Mar 93.  He died on 13 Apr 08.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ  AFPC/DPSIAR  recommends  denial.   DPSIAR  states  the  member  had  six
opportunities to provide some sort of survivor protection for his wife,  but
failed to do so.  Notwithstanding the  decedent’s  unsuccessful  attempt  to
elect coverage during the last  month  of  the  year  long  open  enrollment
period authorized by PL 101-189, there  is  no  evidence  he  contacted  our
office to apply for  an  administrative  correction.   His  open  enrollment
election form contained what appears to be the monthly  SBP  premium  amount
he thought would be collected from his retired pay if  he  elected  coverage
on a reduced level of retired pay.  The cost  formula  for  the  92-93  open
enrollment was based upon a member’s retirement date, with the maximum  cost
of 11 percent required for members who had retired prior to 21 Sep 72.   His
gross retired pay effective 12 Dec 92 was $738 and a  base  amount  of  $673
would have had an open enrollment cost of $74.07.  Such a base amount  would
have provided the petitioner an SBP annuity of $370 if the member had  lived
for two full years following the date of a valid election.  If the  decedent
had made that election, the amount of the premiums  that  should  have  been
deducted from his retired pay until his  death  would  approximate  $18,000.
Additionally, there is no evidence he submitted an open enrollment  election
on the  petitioner’s  behalf  during  the  two  subsequent  open  enrollment
periods before his death.

SBP is similar to commercial life  insurance  in  that  an  individual  must
elect to participate and pay  the  associated  premiums  in  order  to  have
coverage.  DPSIAR opines to provide entitlement to this widow on  the  basis
of the evidence presented would be unfair to  those  members  who  chose  to
participate when eligible and subsequently received reduced retired  pay  or
to other widows whose sponsors chose not to participate.

The complete DSPIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19  Sep
08 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  error  or  injustice.   Although  the  former   servicemember
attempted to procure SBP coverage for his spouse in Feb  93,  we  note  that
his submission was deemed invalid.  We also note that DFAS-CL  notified  him
a few months later of the invalid submission and provided  him  instructions
on  how  to  properly  resubmit  his  application.   Regrettably,  he  never
responded to DFAS-CL nor did he attempt to procure coverage  during  any  of
the other open enrollment periods offered before his demise.  Therefore,  we
agree with opinion and recommendation of the Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 20 November 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
            Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Member
            Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2008-02569
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 08, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 12 Aug 08.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 19 Sep 08.




            THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
            Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03362

    Original file (BC 2007 03362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member and the applicant were allegedly married in Tijuana, Mexico on 8 Jun 82, and he elected spouse only coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay during the open enrollment authorized by Public Law (PL) 97-35 (1 Oct 81 – 30 Sep 82). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has recommended that we consider voiding the decedent's 23 Sep 82 election for SBP coverage for the applicant, suggesting that the "erroneous deductions of SBP premiums for spouse coverage be refunded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03821

    Original file (BC 2007 03821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS records reflect the decedent elected maximum child only SBP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 89 retirement. Records further contain an annotation that the applicant concurred with the member’s SBP election prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702519

    Original file (9702519.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 1992 open enrollment. However, spouse premiums could be terminated following divorce if the member additionally selected Option 4. He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 92 open enrollment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01092

    Original file (BC-2008-01092.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and member were married again on 14 Feb 75, however he did not request SBP coverage be reestablished on the applicant's behalf within the first year of their marriage, or during subsequent open enrollment periods. The SBP Election Certificate, provided by the applicant reflects he elected spouse and child SBP coverage on 11 Jan 80; however, the election was invalid because it was not completed during the authorized open enrollment period of one year. Members who were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02598

    Original file (BC-2012-02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598

    Original file (BC 2012 02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764

    Original file (BC-2002-03764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03097

    Original file (BC-2007-03097.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The effective date of his election was 28 Sep 82; however, the election was voided by his 13 Jul 84 death. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01351

    Original file (BC-2012-01351.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDAR states that there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the absence of a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary, effective 11 January 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...