RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02569
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her late husband's records be corrected to show that he elected spouse
coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In Feb 93, her husband completed the DD Form 2618, Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP) Open Enrollment Election requesting premium payments to begin in Mar
93. The form was mailed “certified” to the Defense Finance and Accounting
Service-Denver, CO, (DFAS-DE) and certified received on 16 Feb 93; however,
it appears the request was never processed.
In support of the application, she submits a copy of the SBP Open
Enrollment Election form, the certified receipts, the “Afterburner,” the
premium schedule, and her spouse’s death certificate.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant and military service member were married on 26 Sep 59. The
service member elected child only RSFPP prior to his retirement on 1 Sep
67. He did not elect SBP coverage for his spouse after it was enacted, nor
did he make an election during the open enrollment authorized by PL 97-35.
His record contains a copy of a 28 Apr 93 letter from DFAS-DE advising him,
among other things, that the 12 Feb 93 open enrollment election he
submitted was “invalid” because block 10 did not indicate the base amount
upon which he wished to establish coverage. Open enrollment ended on 31
Mar 93. He died on 13 Apr 08.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial. DPSIAR states the member had six
opportunities to provide some sort of survivor protection for his wife, but
failed to do so. Notwithstanding the decedent’s unsuccessful attempt to
elect coverage during the last month of the year long open enrollment
period authorized by PL 101-189, there is no evidence he contacted our
office to apply for an administrative correction. His open enrollment
election form contained what appears to be the monthly SBP premium amount
he thought would be collected from his retired pay if he elected coverage
on a reduced level of retired pay. The cost formula for the 92-93 open
enrollment was based upon a member’s retirement date, with the maximum cost
of 11 percent required for members who had retired prior to 21 Sep 72. His
gross retired pay effective 12 Dec 92 was $738 and a base amount of $673
would have had an open enrollment cost of $74.07. Such a base amount would
have provided the petitioner an SBP annuity of $370 if the member had lived
for two full years following the date of a valid election. If the decedent
had made that election, the amount of the premiums that should have been
deducted from his retired pay until his death would approximate $18,000.
Additionally, there is no evidence he submitted an open enrollment election
on the petitioner’s behalf during the two subsequent open enrollment
periods before his death.
SBP is similar to commercial life insurance in that an individual must
elect to participate and pay the associated premiums in order to have
coverage. DPSIAR opines to provide entitlement to this widow on the basis
of the evidence presented would be unfair to those members who chose to
participate when eligible and subsequently received reduced retired pay or
to other widows whose sponsors chose not to participate.
The complete DSPIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep
08 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Although the former servicemember
attempted to procure SBP coverage for his spouse in Feb 93, we note that
his submission was deemed invalid. We also note that DFAS-CL notified him
a few months later of the invalid submission and provided him instructions
on how to properly resubmit his application. Regrettably, he never
responded to DFAS-CL nor did he attempt to procure coverage during any of
the other open enrollment periods offered before his demise. Therefore, we
agree with opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 November 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Member
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-02569
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 12 Aug 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 19 Sep 08.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03362
The member and the applicant were allegedly married in Tijuana, Mexico on 8 Jun 82, and he elected spouse only coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay during the open enrollment authorized by Public Law (PL) 97-35 (1 Oct 81 30 Sep 82). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has recommended that we consider voiding the decedent's 23 Sep 82 election for SBP coverage for the applicant, suggesting that the "erroneous deductions of SBP premiums for spouse coverage be refunded...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03821
DFAS records reflect the decedent elected maximum child only SBP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 89 retirement. Records further contain an annotation that the applicant concurred with the members SBP election prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 1992 open enrollment. However, spouse premiums could be terminated following divorce if the member additionally selected Option 4. He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 92 open enrollment.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01092
The applicant and member were married again on 14 Feb 75, however he did not request SBP coverage be reestablished on the applicant's behalf within the first year of their marriage, or during subsequent open enrollment periods. The SBP Election Certificate, provided by the applicant reflects he elected spouse and child SBP coverage on 11 Jan 80; however, the election was invalid because it was not completed during the authorized open enrollment period of one year. Members who were...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02598
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03097
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The effective date of his election was 28 Sep 82; however, the election was voided by his 13 Jul 84 death. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01351
DPSIDAR states that there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the absence of a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary, effective 11 January 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...