Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-02497
Original file (BC-2008-02497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	
		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-02497
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 25 June 2009, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
appeal.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the 
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, 
with attachments, at Exhibit F.

In a letter to the Board dated 27 November 2012, the applicant 
requests reconsideration.  She states she has provided proof of 
her being sexually harassed and threatened.  The anxiety, weight 
loss, and nervous disorder she experienced at that time - 
stemmed from the harassment and threats.  Her records reflect 
the medications she used during that time and the side effects 
which would explain her poor duty performance.  She believes she 
should have received a medical discharge.  She further states 
she was victimized over and over by individuals in her chain of 
command.  This situation destroyed her career, marriage, the 
ability to deal with people, accompanied by lifelong nightmares 
and flashbacks, and it has caused her severe anxiety disorder.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a personal 
statement, medical documentation, documents extracted from her 
military personnel records and other associated documents.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G.

________________________________________________________________
_







THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
the previous decision.  Therefore, we do not find the additional 
evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on 
that basis.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the 
applicant’s request.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2008-02497 in Executive Session on 24 September 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dated 21 July 2009, 
w/atchs.
  Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 27 November 2012, 
w/atchs.





5



2

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 02497

    Original file (BC 2008 02497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In a letter to the Board dated 27 November 2012, the applicant requests reconsideration. Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that basis. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01249

    Original file (BC-2012-01249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 February 2008, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) evaluated the applicant’s case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for post-concussive syndrome with headaches, sleep disturbance and cognitive and memory complaints with a history of four previous concussions under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 8045-9304. Under Title 10, U.S.C., Physical Evaluation Boards must determine if a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01393

    Original file (BC-2012-01393.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete response w/attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ disagrees with 5 of the Air Force offices of THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant’s contentions that her contested EPR does not accurately reflect a true account of her performance and enforcement of standards, that her rater gave her deceptive feedback, and that a rating markdown in Section III, block 2, of the EPR was in reprisal for her involvement in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02179

    Original file (BC-2004-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02179 INDEX CODE: 108.01, 110.02, 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 JAN 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) with all back pay and allowances, and her 1989 discharge for pregnancy be changed to a medical discharge for multiple...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01205

    Original file (BC-2012-01205.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2009, the applciant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend her for discharge for mental disorders. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel record, her discharge, to include the character of service, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00932

    Original file (BC-2009-00932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denying the applicant’s requests to change her separation code or narrative reason for separation. While she contends that she forgot about her pre- service medical conditions, the statement she signed while in BMT indicates that she did not disclose her medical conditions because she really wanted to join the Air Force and serve her country. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00072

    Original file (BC-2013-00072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regarding the applicant’s request that she be given a 20 year active duty retirement with full retirement benefits, A1K states that her medical case which included the applicable documentation that ultimately led to a finding of ILOD was appropriately reviewed and a determination was made on that case by the PEB. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant certainly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04310 2

    Original file (BC 2011 04310 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-04310 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reserve retirement be changed to a disability retirement. The applicant disagreed with the IPEB decision; however there is no evidence to show she sought further appellate review of the IPEB findings and recommended disposition. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01439

    Original file (BC-2012-01439.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01439 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Personality Disorder, be changed in order that she may reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She desires her record be changed so that she can apply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02353

    Original file (BC-2012-02353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation) be changed to an RE code “1”. In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement and letters of recommendation. The complete...