RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01020
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Block 24, Character of Service, on his DD 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from “uncharacterized” to
“honorable.”
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never diagnosed with asthma prior to his entry in military service.
His entry was made on factual information with no intent to conceal or
deceive the Air Force. His asthma was a result of environmental changes.
He should not have to suffer.
In support of his application, he submits his DD Form 214, and documents
excerpted from his medical records. His complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 Feb 01. On 9 Aug 01, a
medical examiner diagnosed him with Asthma and stated the condition existed
prior to his enlistment. He concluded the applicant did not meet standards
for continued military service and that his ability to function in the
military was significantly impaired.
On 10 Sep 01, he was notified by his commander that he was recommending his
discharge for Erroneous Enlistment. A legal review by the Staff Judge
Advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended his separation
from the service with an Entry Level Separation. On 13 Sep 01, the
discharge authority approved the recommended discharge.
Applicant was discharged on 28 Sep 01 and issued an uncharacterized
character of service. He served five months on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant
notes the applicant developed shortness of breath and chest tightness
during his second week of Basic Military Training (BMT). His clinical
evaluations demonstrated evidence of airway hyperactivity. Although
environmental factors might be considered in the evolution of a de novo
asthma condition after entering military service, a preponderance of
medical evidence reflects his airway hyperactivity probably existed prior
to his entry in to military service.
The Medical Consultant states the applicant’s denial should not be viewed
as deceptive or a deliberate false statement; as many recruits first
discover the condition after being confronted with the sustained and
uninterrupted exercise requirements such as running. His symptoms were
precipitated by running, reflecting a likely exercise-induced component of
his disease.
Applicant was discharged under current Air Force guidelines for service
members who are unable to perform their military duties for conditions
discovered within the first six months of enlistment. The Medical
Consultant opines had his condition been known, he probably would not have
been accepted into active duty military service.
The Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 May
08 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s
complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and
adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 19 Aug 08 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2008-01020:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 9 May 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 08.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03089
The determination that it existed prior to service was based on his report that the condition existed since the 7th grade. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 30 Apr 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 04.
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluated this application and recommends that the applicant’s request be denied. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02345
The PEB recommended that he be discharged. On 31 Jul 01, the IPEB found him unfit for further military service based on a diagnosis of asthma and recommended that he be discharged with severance pay, with a compensable rating of 10%. He was diagnosed with asthma based on a clinical history consistent with the disease and positive methacholine bronchoprovocation testing.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03280
On 13 September 2006, the applicant’s commander recommended the applicant’s discharge for erroneous enlistment. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the evidence of record shows the applicant’s conditions, back pain and asthma, were appropriately managed and his Entry Level Separation was appropriate. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01757
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01757 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Erroneous Enlistment.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02027A
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit L. Information extracted from applicant’s rebuttal submission reveals he was found medically qualified for enlistment in the Air Force Reserve by the HQ Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon on 8 February 2005, with an approved waiver. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s record is warranted. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03356
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03356 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow reentry in the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02027-2
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit L. Information extracted from applicant’s rebuttal submission reveals he was found medically qualified for enlistment in the Air Force Reserve by the HQ Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon on 8 February 2005, with an approved waiver. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s record is warranted. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00962
The applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation on 18 Nov 04, by reason of “Erroneous Entry (Other),” and was issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service). The applicant was administratively discharged on 18 Nov 04 with an entry level separation (uncharacterized service) for erroneous enlistment due to existing prior to service asthma after 4 months and 13 days on active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00595
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00595 INDEX CODE: 111.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His reactive airways disease is a direct...