Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00253
Original file (BC-2008-00253.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-00253
      INDEX CODE:  110.00
      COUNSEL:  NONE

      HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has not been in trouble since his discharge (clemency).

In support of his application, he submits a Request Pertaining  to  Military
Records form.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

In a general court-martial held on 4 Nov 52,  the  applicant  was  arraigned
and tried for the  charge  of  committing  assault  upon  an  individual  by
cutting him on the arm, back and abdomen with  a  knife,  and  intentionally
inflicting grievous bodily harm.  He was found guilty  and  sentenced  to  a
bad  conduct  discharge,  forfeiture  of  all  pay   and   allowances,   and
confinement at hard labor for one year.

He was dishonorably discharged and released from military service on 10  May
53.  He had served 5 months and 18 days on active  duty  with  210  days  of
lost time due to confinement.

The  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  (FBI)  provided  a   copy   of   an
Investigative Report; however, there was no new activity  listed  since  the
applicant’s prior discharge from service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFLOA/JAJM  recommends  denial.   JAJM  states  the  applicant  submitted  a
request for clemency to the convening authority.  He requested  a  six-month
reduced  sentence  and  return  to  active  duty;  however,  the   convening
authority approved the findings and sentence as  adjudged.   The  Air  Force
Board of Review found the findings and sentencing to be correct in  law  and
fact.

JAJM notes the applicant has not submitted  any  post-service  documentation
pertaining to his behavior over the past 50 years.  JAJM  states  at  trial,
the jury weighed all the information presented in  findings  and  sentencing
to craft a punishment uniquely  suited  to  address  his  criminal  conduct.
JAJM opines to overturn this punishment  now  would  require  the  Board  to
substitute its judgment for that rendered by the  court  and  the  convening
authority when the facts and circumstances were fresh.

Although the applicant asserted self-defense, this was rejected by the  jury
because there was no indication that the force used by  the  victim  was  of
such a degree that the applicant was justified in using a dangerous  weapon.


JAJM notes the adjudged sentence is within the legal limits and  well  below
the maximum  permissible  punishment  of  a  dishonorable  discharge,  total
forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and three years  confinement  to  hard
labor.  A bad conduct discharge is more  than  a  service  characterization,
but as defined under the Rules it is a punishment for  the  crime  committed
while a member of the armed forces.

The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14  Mar
08 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the  Air  Force  offices  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for the conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 7 August 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
      Ms. Judith B. Olvia, Member
      Mr. John E. Petitt, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2008-00253:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Jan 08, w/atch.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 5 Mar 08.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Mar 08




                                  MICHAEL J. NOVEL
                                  Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00160

    Original file (BC-2009-00160.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. Rules for Courts-Martial states that a bad conduct discharge “is designed as punishment for bad-conduct rather than as a punishment for serious offenses of either a civilian...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00591

    Original file (BC-2008-00591.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00591 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: Veterans of Foreign Wars HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01467

    Original file (BC-2006-01467.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01467 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 November 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His characterization of discharge be upgraded from dishonorable to honorable and he receive pay, in the grade of E-4, that he was improperly denied while serving in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01114

    Original file (BC-2008-01114.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01114 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded. The sentence was later remitted to confinement for 18 years and 6 months by the Clemency and Parole board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00810

    Original file (BC-2004-00810.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00810 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. Although the applicant’s adjudged sentence included a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures, his punishment was mitigated with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02552

    Original file (BC-2007-02552.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02552 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be changed to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 4 May 53, the convening authority suspended the bad conduct discharge until the applicant’s release from confinement or until...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05819

    Original file (BC 2013 05819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05819 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Based on a review of the record, JAJM finds no error or injustice with the military justice process which would warrant upgrading the applicant’s discharge to a general (under honorable conditions)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01331

    Original file (BC-2012-01331.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01331 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find no evidence which indicates that the applicant’s service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02627

    Original file (BC-2009-02627.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02627 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to general. He was credited with 2 years, 2 months and 17 days of service to include 3 years, 5 months and 3 days of lost time due to confinement. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03711

    Original file (BC-2007-03711.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03711 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Under 10 USC Section 1552, which amended the basic correction board legislation, the AFBCMR’s ability to correct records related to...