Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03197
Original file (BC-2007-03197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03197
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL: NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under  honorable  conditions  (general)  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The applicant makes no contentions.

Applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Jan 64, as  an  airman
basic for a period of four years.

On  22  Oct  64,  the  applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that  he   was
recommending his discharge  from  the  Air  Force  for  unsuitability.   The
specific reason for the discharge action was the  result  of  a  psychiatric
evaluation that diagnosed  the  applicant  with  an  inadequate  personality
clearly unsuitable for further military service.

His commander advised of him of his rights in this matter.

He was appointed an evaluation officer.  The  evaluation  officer  conducted
an interview with the applicant, reviewed his records and  comments  by  his
commander, and recommended his discharge from the Air Force with  a  general
discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

After consulting with the evaluation officer the applicant  elected  not  to
submit statements in his own behalf.

On 10 Nov 64, the discharge authority directed the applicant  be  discharged
with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

The applicant was discharged on 10 Nov 64.  He served a total of  10  months
and 1 day on active duty.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit  C.   On  14
Dec 07, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant  for  review
and comment within 30 days, as of this date, no response has  been  received
by this office (Exhibit D).

On 14 Dec 07, a request  for  information  pertaining  to  his  post-service
activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30  days.   As
of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  find  no
evidence  of  an  error  or  injustice  that  occurred  in   the   discharge
processing.  Based on the available  evidence  of  record,  it  appears  the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the  discharge
regulation  and  within  the  commander's  discretionary   authority.    The
applicant has provided no evidence  which  would  lead  us  to  believe  the
characterization of the service  was  contrary  to  the  provisions  of  the
governing regulation, unduly harsh,  or  disproportionate  to  the  offenses
committed.  However, should the applicant provide  documentation  pertaining
to his post-service accomplishments and  activities,  this  Board  would  be
willing to review the materials for possible reconsideration of his  request
based on clemency.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
03197 in Executive Session on 22 Jan 08 under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
                       Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 07.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 14 Dec 07.
      Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 14 Dec 07.




                             LAURENCE M. GRONER
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02864

    Original file (BC-2007-02864.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a legal review of the discharge case file, the staff judge advocate found it legally sufficient and recommended that he be discharged from the Air Force with a general discharge and concurred with the evaluation officer that the applicant not be considered for probation and rehabilitation. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Nov 07. Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Nov 07, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03278

    Original file (BC-2006-03278.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 June 1982, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of Air Force Manual (AFM) 39-12 for drug abuse. The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his UOTHC discharge upgraded to honorable. The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02037

    Original file (BC-2007-02037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 DEC 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 14 Feb 91, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00793

    Original file (BC-2008-00793.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00793 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103469

    Original file (0103469.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has received no response. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that his separation code should remain the same since he did in fact, voluntarily request discharge for the good of the service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1988-01539-2

    Original file (BC-1988-01539-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated, 9 Dec 76, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) notified the applicant that his discharge was upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). However, in view of the AFDRB’s earlier decision, and the contents of the FBI Report, we are unpersuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge to fully honorable, his RE code of 2, or his reason for separation is warranted. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Dec 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02641

    Original file (BC-2006-02641.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a statement, DD Form 4s, Enlistment Record Armed Forces of the United States, Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record and various medical documents. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit G). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03499

    Original file (BC-2006-03499.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03499 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 May 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1988 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The recommendation was approved on 7 Dec 88.] Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02554

    Original file (BC-2007-02554.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 1 year, 1 month and 28 days on active duty. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an Investigative Report which is at Exhibit C. On 18 October 2007, the Board staff requested the applicant provide post- service documentation within 30 days (Exhibit D). We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00313

    Original file (BC-2011-00313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Prior to his termination from the Air Force on 22 Dec 78, his service record was outstanding. While we found no evidence of an error or injustice with regards to the...