RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02201
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Air Force
Outstanding Unit Award with “V” device and 3 Oak Leaf Clusters (AFOUA w/V &
3OLC), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), the Combat Crew Member
Badge, Enlisted Aircrew Wings, and to show Vietnam service from 30
September 1971 through 22 June 1973.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is entitled to these awards for his participation in Vietnam from 30
September 1971 to 22 June 1973. In his attempt to become involved in
Vietnam Veteran’s activities, he is being denied participation since his DD
Form 214 does not reflect his Vietnam service.
In support of his appeal, he has provided copies of an unsigned letter from
his commander specifying dates and combat flight dates of his Vietnam
service, a flight records summary indicating total combat flight hours, his
first Air Medal (AM) citation, SO GA-19 awarding him the AM w/3OLC, and his
DD Form 214.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 25 July 1969, and served as
a voice processing specialist and airborne voice processing specialist
until being released from active duty on 23 July 1973. He was assigned to
the 6990th Security Group (SG), Kadena AB, Okinawa, from 9 September 1971
to 22 July 1973. During this period, he possessed a Top Secret Clearance
and flew some missions into Southeast Asia, to include Vietnam.
The applicant’s Master Personnel Records already reflect entitlement to the
SAEMR, and AFPC/DPSIDR has confirmed his entitlement, while assigned to the
6990th SG, to the AM with 3 Oak Leaf Clusters, the Vietnam Service Medal,
the Air Force Longevity Service Award, and the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm, and has taken action to correct his records.
The AFOUA is awarded by the Secretary of the Air Force to military units
that distinguish themselves during peacetime or in action against hostile
forces of an armed enemy of the U.S. It is restricted to recognizing acts
or services that place the unit’s performance significantly above that of
other units of similar composition and mission responsibility, and only
10 percent of similar units assigned to each command are recommended
annually. Subordinate units/activities do not automatically share in an
award with the parent unit or organization, and must be specifically
identified in the parent organization’s nomination. The “V” device is
only awarded if the award is for outstanding achievement or meritorious
service in a combat area.
The RVNCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the U.S. who served
for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 to 28 March
1973, or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and
contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate
of six months. Only members of the U.S. Armed Forces who meet the criteria
established for the VSM or the Air Force Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam)
during the period of service required are considered to have contributed
direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces. It may be awarded to those
members who did not complete the required length of service but who, during
wartime, were wounded by the enemy in a military action, captured by the
enemy during action or in the line of duty, but later released or rescued,
or killed in action or in the line of duty. It may also be awarded to
those members who were assigned in Vietnam on 28 January 1973, and who
served a minimum of 60 calendar days in Vietnam during the period 29
January 1973 to 28 March 1973.
During the applicant’s period of service, the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM)
was awarded to members completing an aggregate of three years of sustained
professional performance as an Air Force combat ready aircrew or missile
launch crewmember assigned to an operational unit subject to the Combat
Readiness Rating System, or as a weapons director, aircraft control and
warning operator, technician, or superintendent, an electronic warfare
countermeasure technician, an Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Service
helicopter aircrew member, or as a member of a combat control team. During
this period, the member must have been certified as combat or mission ready
according to Air Force and major command qualification criteria by the
appropriate wing commander or commander of a group not reporting to a wing,
and be serving in a qualifying position. Additionally, AFM 900-3, dated 20
January 1972, paragraph 10-4, Combat Crew Member Badge, stated in paragraph
10-4e(2) that a reassignment from combat crew status will automatically
terminate a person’s authority to wear the badge. Paragraph 10-4e(3)
stated that a person’s eligibility to wear this badge will not be entered
on personnel records because paragraph 10-4e(3)(b) stated the Combat Crew
Member Badge is not awarded permanently.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSI recommends denial of the award of the Combat Crewmember Badge.
The Combat Crewmember Badge was established by the Air Force on 1 September
1964, and worn by those personnel serving in positions in which they were
accruing creditable service towards the CRM. The Combat Crewmember Badge
was a qualification badge, not a medal, and the documentation in the
applicant’s record does not document training or qualification for the CRM;
therefore, the Combat Crewmember Badge was not awarded at the time of his
discharge.
The AFPC/DPSI evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his DD
Form 214 to reflect credit for service in Vietnam. There is no
documentation in his Master Personnel Record to show that he actually
landed in Vietnam, or that shows a specific place and time that he was on
the ground in Vietnam.
The AFPC/DPAAP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of
the AFOUA w/V and additional OLCs, and the RVNCM. Applicant’s Master
Personnel Records do not contain, and he has not provided, documentation
showing that he was assigned or attached to a unit in the Republic of
Vietnam for at least a 6-month period, or that he was assigned to a unit
that earned the AFOUA w/V.
The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
During his tenure, the 6990th Security Squadron was attached to the
National Security Agency vice any U.S. military unit in Vietnam. The
6990th was assigned to the 376th Strategic Wing which flew the RC-135M
aircraft operational platform based out of Kadena AB, Okinawa. He and
countless others who passed through the 6990th, question the heretofore
unvoiced contention that one had to be attached directly to a unit in
Vietnam. Of the millions of Vietnam veterans who passed through the
theater of combat operations, a countless number of them (particularly Air
Force and Navy personnel) never physically set foot on Vietnamese soil, yet
flew combat sorties and their records reflect Vietnam service.
He can only offer anecdotal evidence of support he set foot “on the ground”
in Vietnam. He provided flight records indicating missions flown on EC-
121s while TDY with Air Defense Command at Korat RTAB. These missions
landed at Da Nang AB daily while engaged in direct combat operations during
the Linebacker I bombing campaign. Unfortunately, he was not provided with
a copy of his TDY orders for this highly classified secret mission.
While he has no evidence of support regarding his qualification for the
Combat Crew Badge, he can only offer that flight crew members who
participated in Combat Apple operations were granted this qualification by
the commanding staff and proudly wore the badge. This is further supported
by the information he obtained through the 6990th veterans organization and
there seems to be a conflict of opinion regarding this matter.
His assignment with the 6990th was from 9 September 1971 to 23 July 1973
(vice 6 December 1972) which also included missions flown during the
Linebacker II Christmas bombing campaign and numerous missions thereafter.
He has no direct evidence and can only offer the AFOUA w/V was conveyed by
the 6990th and worn by members of the unit. In regards to the RVNCM, his
and members of the 6990th veterans organization research indicates that all
who served with the 6990th during the Vietnam Conflict qualify for this
medal. Their research indicates it is awarded to “…all personnel who meet
one of the following requirements…served outside the geographical limits of
the Republic of Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the
Republic of Vietnam and armed forces for six months…must meet criteria
established for…the Vietnam Service Medal.”
It is not his intent or purpose to make any false claims of service to his
country, but rather to clarify for the record his actual participation and
involvement while serving with the USAF Security Service in the Southeast
Asian Theatre of Operations, which personally includes 100-plus missions
and 1,718.3 combat flights hours through 11 July 1973. He and all of his
fellow comrades in the 6990th were certainly “in Vietnam.”
His personal research into military awards and decorations seems to be in
concurrence with fellow veterans who have also experienced and later
researched inaccuracies in their military personnel records. At the
present time, some of his arguments are certainly anecdotal, and he
therefore requests a grant of extension of time until he can provide
further evidence of support based upon the findings of other individuals.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.
On 29 February 2008, the applicant was advised that in order to comply with
a statutory mandate to process all applications in a more expeditious
manner, extensions of time in which to respond to advisory opinions or
submit additional matters in support of his application could not be
honored. He was further advised if he needed more time, he could request
that his case be administratively closed until such time as he was able to
proceed, and if no response was received within 30 days, his case would be
processed for presentation to the Board. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant awarding the applicant
the RVNCM. His records were administratively corrected to reflect
entitlement to the VSM, and evidence has been presented that he served
outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct
combat support to the RVN for an aggregate of six months. Therefore, we
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of either an error or injustice to warrant favorable action on
the applicant’s request for award of the AFOUA w/V & 3OLC, Combat Crew
Member Badge, Enlisted Aircrew Wings, or to correct his DD Form 214 to show
Vietnam service from 30 September 1971 through 22 June 1973. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces, issued in conjunction with his
23 July 1973 release from active duty, be amended in Item 24, Decorations,
Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or
Authorized, to include the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-02201
in Executive Session on 14 May 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSI, undated.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC.DPAPP, dated 19 Oct 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 31 Dec 07
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jan 08.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Feb 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Feb 08.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 2007-02201
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United
States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured
compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the
Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of
the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that
the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces,
issued in conjunction with his 23 July 1973 release from active duty, be,
and hereby is, amended in Item 24, Decorations, Medals, Badges,
Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, to
include the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03807
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03807 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Crew Badge (CCB) and if applicable, the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00266
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of two personal statements, Minutes of Command Awards and Decorations Board Meeting, dated 5 Nov 69, Bronze Star Medal Citation, Bronze Star Medal disapproval letter, Authorization to Wear the Combat Crew Members Badge, CRM criteria, AF Form 1042, Medical Recommendation for Flying...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01816
Additionally, an individual must meet the following criteria: a) be a member of a unit subject to combat readiness reporting under Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication 6, Volume V (MAJCOMs, Direct Reporting Units, and Forward Operating Units designate qualifying duty positions and units), b) Complete basic and initial training and be formally certified as combat or mission ready in performing the command or unit operational mission. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04696
The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with two Bronze Service Stars (AFOUA w/2BSS) (administratively resolved). The V device for the DFC is only authorized when the medal was awarded of heroism. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04696 in Executive Session on 26 Jun 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the following medals: 1. The Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). DPSIDR states the applicant provided Flight Records, dated 3 Aug 77, that indicate combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02834
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant requests Block 11 of his DD Form 214 be changed to reflect T42399, Master Instructor and Aircraft Electrical Superintendent. The complete DPSIDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterated the errors on his DD Form 214.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01102
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, for the period of service 30 Sep 57 to 20 Aug 60, be corrected to add the following awards: 1. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicants request for the NDSM, indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge, be corrected to reflect 2 years and 7 months foreign service in Block 22c rather than 2 years, 4 months, and 25 days; and, award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02445
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the AFOUA w/V, CRM, VSM w/4BSS, RVCM, and the RVNGC w/P. The RVNGC w/P is awarded by the RVN to units for valorous combat achievements and there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01884
His DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with his 22 August 1967 discharge reflects he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 10 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...