Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02518
Original file (BC-2007-02518.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02518
                       INDEX CODE:  110.00
                       COUNSEL:  NONE

                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATED:  3 FEB 09

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form  22,  Report  of  Separation  and
Record of Service be corrected to reflect his date of enlistment as 21
Jan 89, rather than 21 Jan 90.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He enlisted in the National Guard on 21 Jan 89.

In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his  NGB  Form
22, Report of Separation and Record of Service.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s NGB Form 22 reflects he enlisted in the National Guard
on 21 Jan 90.  He was honorably retired on 26 Dec 06.   He  served  in
the Guard for 23 years, 11 months and 6 days.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1POF recommends the requested relief be denied.  A1POF states the
date of enlistment is  the  last  date  the  member  enlisted  with  a
component.  All satisfactory time that is accumulated through previous
service with another component, is captured within  the  Point  Credit
Accounting  Retirement  Summary  (PCARS).   The  applicant  originally
enlisted in the Virginia Air National Guard on 21 Jan 89 for one year.
 An NGB Form was completed for the one year  period.   That  one  year
period of service was added into block 10b, as prior reserve service.

The complete NGB/A1POF evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
14 Sep 07, for review and response within 30 days.  As of  this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-02518 in Executive Session on 8 Nov 07, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member
                 Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2007-02518 was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Aug 07, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1POF, dated 7 Sep 07.
      Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 07.




                             LAURENCE M. GRONER
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00184

    Original file (BC-2007-00184.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00184 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) determination that he was fit for duty be changed and he be afforded the benefits given to military members involuntarily separated through the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01503

    Original file (BC-2006-01503.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01503 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to show he earned the Small Arms Marksmanship Ribbon. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00005

    Original file (BC-2007-00005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    2 Jan 90 through 1 Jan 91 (Applicant refers to as EPR #3) C. 2 Jan 91 through 23 Sep 91 (Applicant refers to as EPR #1) He be given supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt). Applicant states it should be noted that this EPR started while he was assigned at Hahn Air Base (AB) Germany, but ended at MacDill Air Force Base (AFB), Florida. Applicant submitted an addendum to his application discussing the Weighted Airman Promotion cutoff scores for individuals...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01268

    Original file (BC-2007-01268.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01268 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NONE MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 OCT 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Southwest Asia Service Medal, the Air Force Short Tour Ribbon, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02037

    Original file (BC-2007-02037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 DEC 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 14 Feb 91, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03419

    Original file (BC-2006-03419.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After serving in the Army National Guard (ARNG) in the grade of E6, he was enlisted into a position with the MIANG that was an authorized technical sergeant (E6) position. The attached SME input states the applicant’s enlistment with the MIANG was correct and cites Air National Guard (ANG) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the ANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force, as the basis for their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00799

    Original file (BC-2007-00799.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other service member was also drinking alcohol. He was never given a copy of the form after it was completed and was not aware it existed. In support of the application, the applicant submits copies of the DA Form 2173, the emergency room treatment report, a letter to SAF/IGQ, special orders, and his DD Form 214.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03231

    Original file (BC-2007-03231.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her appeal, she has provided copies of a court order reflecting the name change from the Allegan County, Michigan Judicial Circuit Family Division, a letter from the physician who performed the Genital Reassignment Surgery, a DD Form 214, dated 29 September 1972, RO CA- 075579 and an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the United States Air Force, effective 7 October 1974, and an NGB Form 22 and SO ANG-A-39-MI, which show a final separation date of 1 March 1991. AFI 36-2608,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01789

    Original file (BC-2006-01789.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01789 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 17, 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A resume of the applicant’s airman performance reports follows: CLOSE-OUT DATE OVERALL RATING 24 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01622

    Original file (BC-2007-01622.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 29 November 2007, under the...