RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01790
INDEX CODE: 107.00
HENRY M. BAKER COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 DEC 2008
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for his service
during World War II.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He meets the requirements for the award. His roommate flew the
same missions as he, and received the DFC. He completed 492.15
hours of combat mission flight time. Other members of his unit who
met the requirements for the award received their medals and he
feels he deserves the award as well. He was moving one day, and
while looking through his records, he realized he had not received
the DFC.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted copies of his flight
records and General Order Number 128, dated 6 June 45, awarding him
the Air Medal for meritorious achievement by participating in more
than 150 hours of operational flight.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant served on active duty in the Army Air Corps from
9 October 1942 to 15 February 1946. He served from
1 September 1944 to 1 September 1945, in North Africa and China.
He ferried the B-26 aircraft to England and Russia four times each.
His highest grade held was captain. Applicant was released from
active duty on 15 February 1946 and credited with 1 year, 9 months,
and 18 days of continental service and 1 year, 6 months, and
18 days of foreign service, totaling 3 years, 4 months, and 6 days
of active duty service.
Applicant was awarded the Air Medal, European African Middle
Eastern Theatre, American Theatre, World War II Victory Medal, and
the Asiatic Pacific Theatre Ribbon with Three Bronze Service Stars
and the honorable Lapel Button.
The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded
for heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in
aerial flight. The performance of the act of heroism must be
evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty.
During World War II, the Army Air Forces in the India-China Theater
had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the
completion of 300 hours of operational hours for transport/air
combat missions from 1942 to 1944.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial,
stating, in part, they were unable to find supporting documentation
such as a recommendation for or special orders, awarding the DFC.
The requirement for award of the DFC changed dramatically in the
middle of WWII. Early in 1943, while visiting various combat
theaters, General H. Arnold, expressed his concern with the large
number of DFC’s being awarded. Under policy existing prior to
14 August 1943, the DFC was awarded on the basis of the number of
hours or missions completed. He believed that this so called
“score card” basis lessened the value of the award and called a
negative morale factor. To correct this situation, it was decided
that the “score card” basis for awarding the DFC be discontinued.
The timeline for submitting decorations is two years from the date
of the act or achievement. In the case of WWII decorations,
3 May 51 was cut-off for submission. However, under the FY96
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was enacted into
law on 10 February 1996, this timeline has now been waived.
A written recommendation must meet two criteria:
1. be made by someone, other than the member himself, in the
member’s chain of command at the time of the incident, and, who has
firsthand knowledge of the acts or achievements, and,
2. be submitted through a congressional member who can ask a
military service to review a proposal for a decoration based on the
merits of the proposal and the award criteria in existence when the
event occurred.
HQ AFPC/DPPPR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reiterated his original claim that he should be entitled
to the DFC. He again, noted the orders provided to substantiate
his claim that he should be entitled to the DFC.
In support of his appeal, applicant provided a personal statement
and other supporting documentation.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note the
applicant completed 492 hours of air transport missions while
assigned to the Army Air Forces as a pilot. We also note that
during the contested period, Army Air Forces, India-Burma Division
had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the
completion of 300 hours of operational flight in air
transport/combat missions. In support of the appeal, the applicant
has provided a copy of General Orders Number 128. In view of this
order, and given the total number of missions the applicant
completed, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 6 June 1945, he
was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, for extraordinary
achievement in participating in more than 300 hours of operational
flight in transport aircraft over the India-China air routes.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2007-01790 in Executive Session on 27 September 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 May 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 13 Jun 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Aug 07.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
AFBCMR
1535 Command Drive
EE Wing, 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002
Airman First Class Aaron M. Necessary, USAF
4601 Catamaran Drive # 921
Fort Worth TX 76135
Dear Airman Necessary
Your application to the Air Force Board for Correction of
Military Records, AFBCMR BC-2007-02457, has been finalized.
The Board determined that the military records should be
corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the
Chief of Staff United States Air Force. The office responsible for
making the correction will inform you when your records have been
changed.
After correction, the records will be reviewed to determine
if you are entitled to any monetary benefits as a result of the
correction of records. This determination is made by the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS-DE), Denver, Colorado, and
involves the assembly and careful checking of finance records. It
may also be necessary for the DFAS-DE to communicate directly with
you to obtain additional information to ensure the proper
settlement of your claim. Because of the number and complexity of
claims workload, you should expect some delay. We assure you,
however, that every effort will be made to conclude this matter at
the earliest practical date.
Sincerely
PHILLIP E. HORTON
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachments:
1. Record of Proceedings
2. Copy of Directive
cc:
DFAS-DE
AFBCMR BC-2007-02457
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to AARON M. NECESSARY, 465-81-4504, be corrected to
show that on 9 February 2007, competent authority determined that
he be required to monetarily reimburse the government for the total
cost of his advanced education at the United States Air Force
Academy in accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section
2005 (a) (3); rather than granted an educational delay, and called
to active duty in an enlisted capacity for a period of three (3)
years.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AFBCMR BC-2007-01790
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 6
June 1945, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, for
extraordinary achievement in participating in more than 300 hours
of operational flight in transport aircraft over the India-China
air routes.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02989
DPPPR states on 11 February 2006, the applicant’s package was forwarded to the approval authority, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for consideration. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Mar 06. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-02989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01090
Under the new policy an individual was considered for award of the AM after completing 250 operational hours and for the DFC after 500 hours. No documentation was submitted indicating the applicant completed 500 operational flying hours. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Through a letter from his son, he contends that based upon the AFHRA/RS description of the requirements for award of flying decorations in WWII, the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04213
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Although his father was recommended for the DFC, which was approved by the squadron through group levels, Fifth Air Force, did not act on the recommendation due to the wars closure. Although the applicant provides signed recommendation, he provides no proposed citation or evidence the recommendation was approved. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00448
He be awarded an additional Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) to his Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Therefore, in view of this, we believe it would be in the interest of justice to award him an additional DFC because his remaining 200 combat hours meet the criteria for this recognition. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 18...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00510
He was never awarded an additional AM for his 26th through 30th combat missions In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the former 67th Deputy Squadron Navigator recommending him for award of the DFC and an additional oak leaf cluster to the AM, and a list of his combat missions. The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01238
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the AM because he was assigned to the flight crew of the commander of the 84th Depot Repair Squadron, 15th Air Force, who was awarded the AM. Further, under the 1996 NDAA service members may request consideration of awards not previously eligible because of time limitations, provided the written recommendations be made by someone other than the member himself, in the member’s chain...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01874
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on established Eighth Air Force policy of awarding a DFC upon the completion of 10 lead combat missions, based on his completion of 11 lead combat missions he should be awarded the DFC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00453
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00453 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 August 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, First Oak Leaf Cluster (DFC, 1 OLC) and the Air Medal, Fifth Oak Leaf Cluster (AM, 5 OLC). The DFC was established...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00420
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In view of his completion of a total of 37 combat missions and based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he should be awarded the DFC and an additional AM. In view of the above, and since the applicant never received a DFC for his completion of a combat...