RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01563
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 NOVEMBER 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214, Homosexual
Act, be removed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Several recruiters and the Veterans Administration (VA) stated the
narrative reason on his DD Form 214 is an illegal statement.
It has limited his career progression. It also eclipses the honorable
characterization and has restricted his hiring opportunities due to
bias and prejudices. Further, it restricts federal hiring
opportunities. This statement has caused him undue hardship.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a DD Form 293, and a
copy of his DD Form 214.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 22 June
1989.
On 19 January 2006, the applicant was notified of his commander's
intent to recommend him for discharge for homosexual conduct. The
specific reason for the discharge action was that on 16 December 2005,
the applicant engaged in a homosexual act. The applicant was advised
of his rights in this matter.
On 19 January 2006, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the
notification memorandum and after consulting with legal counsel,
invoked his right to a hearing before an administrative discharge
board. However, on 9 March 2006, he submitted a conditional waiver of
his right associated with an administrative discharge board hearing
contingent upon receipt of no less than an honorable discharge.
On 9 March 2006, the applicant submitted a request for Lengthy Service
Probation (LSP) based on his outstanding 17 years of military service.
His commander recommended denial of his request for LSP.
The base staff judge advocate reviewed the applicant’s case and found
it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended the
applicant’s conditional waiver be accepted and his case forwarded for
action on his LSP request.
The command staff judge advocate reviewed the applicant’s case and
found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended the
applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation
and rehabilitation.
The Discharge Authority approved the separation and directed the
applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation
and rehabilitation.
On 16 August 2006, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council
denied his request for LSP and directed the approved administrative
discharge be executed. He was discharged on 27 August 2006, with an
honorable discharge. He served 17 years, 6 months and 10 days on
active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the requested relief be denied. DPPRS states
the applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any errors
or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. Based
upon the documentation in the applicant's file, DPPRS believes his
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within
the sound discretion of the discharge authority.
The complete AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
July 2007, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice warranting a change in the narrative
reason for separation. While the narrative reason for separation the
applicant received at the time of his discharge was correct and in
accordance with the governing Instruction, it is our opinion that its
application in this case is not justifiable. Considering the fact
that prior to his discharge he served faithfully and honorably for
over 17 years and taking into consideration the impact the narrative
reason has on his ability to integrate into the civilian community at
this point in his life, we believe changing the narrative reason to
Secretarial Authority would be the appropriate action to take in this
case. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 August 2006, he
was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2,
(Secretarial Authority), with a Separation Program Designator code of
“KFF.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-01563 in Executive Session on 2 October 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Mark J. Novitski, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 May 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 21 May 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 07.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-01563
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116) it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 27 August 2006,
he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2,
(Secretarial Authority), with a Separation Program Designator code of
“KFF.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01430
On 6 Jul 06, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable. Based upon the documentation in the applicant's file, DPPRS believes his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within the sound discretion of the discharge authority. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00647
On 16 May 1996, he submitted a statement admitting his engagement in one or more homosexual acts and requested his discharge from active duty on the basis of homosexual conduct. On 24 May 1996, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed the applicant be discharged. JA’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01154
He provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service or his reenlistment eligibility code. AFPC/DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 May 2006 for review and response within 30 days. As such, we believe it would be appropriate to change his narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00599
The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. He provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00140
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00140 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 22 JULY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service) be removed from his DD 214. DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00372
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00372 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 20 MAY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service (uncharacterized), his reentry code (2C) and his narrative reason for separation (fraudulent entry) be changed and/or removed from his DD 214. He started having...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00679
On 10 December 2004, the applicant was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (defective enlistment agreement), with an honorable discharge, a SPD code of "KDS", an RE code of "2B" and a narrative reason for separation of "Defective Enlistment Agreement." AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03790
Applicant was discharged on 12 Jun 87, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request on 24 Jan 07, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02896
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Mr. Don H. Kendrick, and Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, considered this application on 13 March 2007. Applicant’s E-mail Response, 12 Mar 07 AFBCMR BC-2006-02896 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.