RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01216
INDEX CODE: 128.14
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 October 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for personal, out-of-pocket expenses of $2,838.00 (moving
company), $2,610.00 (required painting expense), $573.46 (Move-In-Housing-
Allowance), and $283.80 (required lease registration fee), incurred as a
result of an authorized, local, short-distant move due to housing safety
hazards.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was authorized the move per the JFTR, volume 1, section 5255, paragraph
D-1, but the 31st CES Housing Flight Chief acted on his own personal
interpretation of the regulation. In addition, the 31st CES Housing Flight
Chief never involved the 31st FW/CC for approval or disapproval, as
required by regulation.
His First Sergeant contacted the 31st CES/CC, who approved the move.
In support of his appeal, he has furnished copies of a personal statement,
dated 9 April 2007, letters from the housing counselor and previous
landlord, dated 22 September 2005, a letter from DET 17 OLB/CC, dated 27
September 2005, e-mails dated 27, 28, and 29 September 2005, and 23 and 24
March 2006, extracts from JFTR v.1 U5355 and JFTR v.1 U10026, and various
documents (paint expense letter, moving receipt, lease agreement, and
registration receipt) pertaining to his move.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was leasing an off-base residence in the vicinity of Aviano AB,
Italy, when, sometime during the summer of 2005, the basement flooded,
including some or all of the residential electrical wiring. He felt this
situation posed an unsafe environment for his family, and secured another
residence on the economy prior to an inspection of his current residence.
He personally paid the associated costs to perform this move.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A7CA-2 recommends denial, as neither sufficient documentation nor
supporting testimony from on-site personnel has been provided to support
his request.
JFTR Vol. 1, Sec 5355, Para D-1, requires an economy-to-economy move to “be
at Government expense, for example, when the member is directed by
competent authority to vacate local economy quarters because the commander
has: (1) determined the member’s residence does not meet Service health or
sanitation standards, or (2) placed the housing area/complex “off-limits”.”
Applicant has not provided documentation where the 31st FW/CC or 31st
CES/CC made this determination.
AFI 32-6001, Para 4.6.2, states “With written approval from the Commander,
assign housing as an out-of-turn assignment for hardship conditions.
Assign members to the next uncommitted unit in the appropriate grade and
bedroom category to satisfy the requirement, and do not allow a turndown
option.” Applicant has not provided documentation where the 31st FW/CC or
31st CES/CC made this determination.
AFI 32-6001, Para 6.5, states “When involuntary relocations are required to
complete emergency repairs and major renovation projects, the Commander
directs residents to relocate to other FH or to community housing.”
Applicant has not provided documentation where the 31st FW/CC or 31st
CES/CC made this determination.
According to the 31st CES Housing Flight Chief during the incident; “I’m
pretty sure we visited the home and couldn’t find where the home was not
livable after the water was removed, and that’s why we didn’t authorize an
economy-to-economy move. If the member asked for a government move from an
economy unit because of livability issues, standard practice was to offer
government housing first. We would never have moved a member from economy-
to-economy housing without the CC’s approval. Period! If that document
isn’t available, we didn’t recommend the government pay the move.”
Applicant relocated to another economy house without proper authorization,
and this action required him to incur a financial obligation for which he
expected reimbursement, even though he had been advised prior to the
relocation that reimbursement was not authorized. The quarters are
currently occupied by another military family, and while the residence
stood vacant for several months and it is impossible to know if the
landlord made improvements to the quarters, it is clear this facility was
never posted as an off-limits facility.
Although they recommend denial, if the decision is made to grant the relief
sought, they recommend $5,265 should be reimbursed based on the following
breakdown of costs:
$2,610 – Estimate to perform a government contracted
move
$2,132 – Painting expenses based on his contract
$ 523 – Move In Housing Allowance
The USAF/A7CA-2 evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 July
2007, for review and comment, within 30 days. However, as of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Based
on the evidence of record and the documentation provided, it appears that
the applicant relocated to another economy house without proper
authorization. If he can provide documentation that no government housing
was available, or that the proper command authorities approved his
relocation to another economy house, we will reconsider his application.
However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01216
in Executive Session on 30 August 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Apr 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/A7CA-2, dated 13 Jun 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jul 07.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02156
He had a choice of either renting a free sector house and, possibly, incurring out of pocket expenses during his tour or to rent a Dutch government controlled house within his OHA, but without light fixtures, curtains, and floor coverings. It is also pointed out that free sector rent for the type of house required by the applicant averaged 1500 Euro while the OHA maximum was 1400 Euro. I believe in reaching their decision, the majority has given too much weight to the fact that there does...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01353 . Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, dtd 27 May 1 9 9 8 , w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Record 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1 040 "-r This responds to a request fofi a BCMR advisory on-ho records be changed to show he was due...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as. - Panel Chaif Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, 27 May 1998, w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFDPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330- 1040 SUBJECT: ction of Military Records This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o his records be changed to show he was due...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010283
The applicant requests, in effect, back pay for Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) and utilities paid for Malaysia from the period 10 March 2006 through 30 June 2006. Evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to receive OHA from the period of his retirement transition from 10 March 2006 to 30 June 2006. Therefore, the applicant is only entitled to OHA at the with-dependent rate for Korea from the period 3 March 2006 through 9 March 2006.
Dollars had either received OHA advances t The Per Diem, Travel, and instead of the local currency, in this c as able to implement a solution to the Transportation Allowances Committ problem for members who had received OHA advances but could not devise a similar solution for individuals l had their leases written in U.S. Therefore, we recommend the Board gran to reflect that he received a rental advance and, OHA rate. @ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01820 AUG 2 4.1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: f the Air The pertinen Force relating to be corrected to show for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03660
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03660 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for moving his dependents and household goods (HHG) more than a year before he was issued Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders. ...
Air Force Board for Correction. - Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, 27 May 1998, w/Atch Panel Chai'r DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330- 1040 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records- This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o records be changed to show he was due reimbursement for is requesting his sing allowance rent, higher, OHA...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01623 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that on 20...