RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01096
INDEX CODE: 136.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect his eligibility for Concurrent
Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His medical records indicate he was diagnosed in 1971 with a diabetic
condition. He was retired due to his diabetic condition. His Veterans
Administration (VA) rating is 10 percent.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214,
Report of Separation from Active Duty, a Physical Profile Serial Report
form, retired pay newsletter, VA disability claim June 1977, AFPC/DPPDC
letter dated 2 Nov 06, and an excerpt from the Afterburner.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was honorably retired from the Regular Air Force effective 31 Jan
77 in the grade of Major. He completed 20 years and 10 months of active
military service.
EXAMINER’S NOTE: The Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payment (CRDP)
program, established by Public Law (PL) 108-136, provides compensation to
certain retirees with service-connected disabilities of 50 percent or
higher, with the exception of disability retirees with less than 20 years
of service, and retirees who have combined their military and civilian
service time to qualify for a civil service retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS-RPB-TQAL/CL) indicated
that the applicant is not eligible for CRDP. The CRDP was created by
section 641 of Public Law 108-136 effective 1 Jan 04. A limitation of this
program is that the member must be in receipt of DVA disability
compensation rated at 50 percent or greater. Evidence submitted by
applicant indicated that he has been rated by the DVA as 10 percent
disabled. The applicant can apply to the DVA to increase his disability
rating.
A complete copy of the DFAS-RPB-TQAL/CL evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 20 Apr 07, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-
01096 in Executive Session on 5 June 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Marcia Jane Buchman, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007-
01096 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Mar 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS, dated 12 Apr 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Apr 07.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01129
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A statement be added to his record stating had he not become disabled, he would have had a very good chance of remaining in the Air Force for 20 years in order to qualify for Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00117
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She took her oath of office and became a member of the Air Force on 29 Mar 63, which would credit her with over 20 years of service for purposes of qualifying her for the CRDP. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00561
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00561 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he has 21 years, 7 months, and 8 days of total active service, rather than 19 years and 20 days. He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 Jun 58 for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01370
A complete copy of the DFAS-RPB-TQAL/CL evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial indicating the applicant’s DD Form 214 not be amended or changed reflect that she was medically retired on a later date since she was permanently retired after her DD Form 214 was issued. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01291
The Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP) program, established by Public Law (PL) 108-136, provides compensation to certain retirees with service-connected disabilities of 50 percent or higher, with the exception of disability retirees with less than 20 years of service, and retirees who have combined their military and civilian service time to qualify for a civil service retirement. After careful review of the available records, it appears the applicant has been credited...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00010
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFDC recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Regarding the applicants request for CRDP, a medically retired member with less than 20 years of service is not entitled to CRDP. In addition, members retired by reason of physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02368
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02368 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP). Per ARPC/DPPR memorandum dated 20 Apr 04, the applicant completed the required years of service under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. § 1552 and Air Force Instruction, 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, to reflect that on 29 Jul 03,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00061
Since he has been reinstated to active duty as though he never retired, he should not have been required to pay SBP premiums as an active duty member. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, we find no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00307
The Board denied his request for disability retirement. They gave the following analysis of the case: To be eligible for CRSC, a retiree must have completed at least 20 years of service creditable for computing retired pay and have a qualifying combat-related disability. Furthermore, applicant fails to account for the differences between types of retirement and service time when he concludes that he is entitled to CRSC because he is a Chapter 61 retiree with 20 years of service and a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01155 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX XX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be corrected to reflect that he completed over 20 years of active service to enable him to be eligible for the Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payment (CRDP) Program. Applicant’s complete...