RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02873
INDEX CODE: 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Promotion Effective Date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade
of major be changed to 7 April 2006, rather than 15 June 2006 and 3
March 2006, respectively.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) deleted his name from the
Fiscal Year 2006 (FY06) Reserve Officer Mandatory Promotion Act
(ROPMA) in error. The Board did not realize he had transferred
directly from the Army to the Air National Guard (ANG). The
promotions eligibility office added him to the list however, the Board
directorate deleted him. He was subsequently position vacancy (PV)
promoted and received a PED of 15 June 2006 and a DOR of 3 March 2006.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his
promotion order, email trails and other pertinent documentation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed 22 June 2004 in the Alaska Air National Guard
(AKANG) with a DOR of 7 April 1999. Based on the 1999 DOR, he was
eligible for promotion consideration by the FY06 ANG Line and Nonline
Major Promotion Selection Board which convened at HQ ARPC on 18 April
2005. Had he been selected for promotion by this Board, he would have
a DOR of 7 April 2006. However, his electronic record in the Military
Personnel Data System (MilPDS) indicated his appointment took place
following a break in service. The apparent break in service rendered
him ineligible for promotion consideration in accordance with 10
U.S.C., Section 14301 (a), wherein is stated “…Commonly known as the 1-
year rule, officer must be on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL),
active duty list, or a combination of both for the year preceding the
Board. Consequently, he did not meet the FY06 Board. The MilPDS was
wrong as the applicant transferred from the Army to the ANG without a
break in service. When the error was noted, the ANG requested a PV
promotion for him. He was promoted with a 3 March 2006 DOR and a 15
June 2006 PED.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC states while he may be eligible for special selection board (SSB)
in lieu of the FY06 ANG Line and Non-line Major Promotion Selection
Board, ARPC finds there could be pitfalls to granting an SSB. While
he could gain some 70 days of active duty pay for participation
between 7 April and 14 June 2006, adjusting his DOR from 3 March to 7
April 2006 would cost him time in grade (TIG) toward his next
promotion opportunity. This could affect his pin-on date for his next
promotion. The PV promotion could bar further SSB consideration.
ARPC cites 10 U.S.C. Section 14301 (c) wherein is stated a previously
selected officer is not eligible for promotion consideration if the
office has been approved for Federal recognition. He was on a list
for Federal recognition of the PV promotion with a DOR of
approximately 35 days prior to his mandatory promotion date. His
participation record shows a 7-year break without performance
documentation (six years as a civilian and one year with the Army
National Guard (ARNG) currently not reflected in his record. Lack of
current participation and performance reports could greatly reduce his
opportunity for promotion. Adjusting his DOR from 15 June to 7 April
could give him monetary value for 70 days active duty pay. However,
10 U.S.C. Section 14308(c)(2) states a Reserve officer is not entitled
to pay and allowances if the effective date of his promotion is
adjusted to a date earlier than the actual date unless another
provision of law takes effect. The only provision of law for Reserve
of the Air Force officers to receive a back-dated effective date is in
10 U.S.C. Section 14502 wherein it is stated only an SSB can correct
effective date and grant the additional pay and allowances.
ARPC also notes while researching his case, his DOR upon appointment
to the ANG was 28 November 1998 rather than 7 April 1999. Therefore,
his DOR to captain would have been 28 November 1998.
ARPC recommends granting the applicant an SSB. Should he be selected
by the SSB his DOR would be 28 November 2005 rather than 3 March or 7
April 2006. The November DOR would preempt the PV promotion DOR and
10 U.S.C. section 14301(c) would no longer apply. SSB consideration
has been used in the past for both ANG and Air Force Reserve officers
requesting an earlier DOR and PED. Should he not be selected by the
SSB the ANG PV DOR and PED would not be affected; he would retain his
promotion and current DOR and PED.
ARPC/DPB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant transferred from
the Army National Guard (ARNG) to the Air National Guard without a
break in service and with a DOR of 7 April 1999. At the time he was
appointed to the AKANG he was eligible for promotion consideration by
the FY06 ANG Line and Nonline Major Promotion Selection Board that
convened at HQ ARPC on 18 April 2005. Due to an error on the part of
ARPC he did not meet this Board. When the error was realized, the ANG
promoted him via Position Vacancy (PV) and recommended he apply to
this Board to have his DOR and PED corrected to the earlier date. We
took note of ARPC/DPB’s recommendation the applicant meet an SSB;
however, we believe if he were to be selected for promotion by an SSB,
his new DOR and PED would adversely affect his future promotion
consideration. Therefore, as the error to the applicant is clear and
unambiguous, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated
below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
Reserve grade of major with an effective and date of rank of 7 April
2006, rather than a DOR of 3 March 2006 and a PED of 15 June 2006.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02873 in Executive Session on 11 January 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member
Ms. Maureen B. Higgins, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPB, dated 22 Nov 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 06.
LAURENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2006-02873
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was promoted
to the Reserve grade of major with an effective and date of rank of 7
April 2006, rather than a DOR of 3 March 2006 and a PED of 15 June
2006.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03281
As the OPR’s were not completed in accordance with governing Instructions and were not timely, she was forced to meet a mandatory promotion board instead of qualifying for a Position Vacancy (PV) promotion to major. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the ANG advisory cites a paragraph from ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2504, Federal Recognition Of Promotion In The Air National Guard And As A Reserve Of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01071
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01071 INDEX CODE: 131.01, 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 AUG 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the FY00 Line and NonLine Major Promotion Board. DPB...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02755
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02755 INDEX CODES: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be immediately promoted to the Reserve grade of colonel, with a retroactive date of 2006; or, in the alternative, his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of colonel by the Fiscal...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02656
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial of applicant’s request to include the MSM, 4 OLC, in his records for the SSB, since it was not effective until after the board convened. The governing AFI states that decoration recommendations should be submitted as soon as possible following the act, achievement, or service, and that timely presentation is essential. Applicant originally requested his academic education and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02735 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reconsidered for promotion to major by the FY05 Air National Guard (ANG) Line and Non-Line Major Selection Board. He contends his Officer Selection Record (OSR) was not complete, as it did not contain the Officer Performance...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03015
His date of rank to first lieutenant was 20 May 2003. Applicant was eligible for the fiscal year 2006 (FY06) ANG Captain’s Promotion list. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of CAPTAIN, Air Force Reserve, with a Date of Rank (DOR) and a Promotion Effective Date (PED) of 20 May 2005 rather than 1...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01320
Although the effective date of his promotion to lieutenant colonel was delayed to 11 Sep 01, his date of rank (DOR) was back-dated to 6 Jun 01, within the OPR reporting period. The applicant contends that his nonselection for promotion to colonel by the FY05 colonel selection board was due to the fact his record as it met the board, only contained one OPR reflecting service in the grade of lieutenant colonel. After careful review of the applicant's submission and the available evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01945
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His PED and date of rank (DOR) from the U0408A major’s board (FY08 Line and Health Professions Major Position Vacancy Promotion (PV) Selection Board, Feb 07) was based on completion of time in grade (TIG) of four years, public release date of the board results or the signature of the approval authority, whichever was later. The applicant received the original DOR of 29 Mar 07, with an effective date...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01792
Since his retention/retirement (R/R) date and the promotion board dates are out of synchronization, the promotion boards have been unable to see how active he has been in the Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends the applicant’s request be denied. The applicant met all the eligibility requirements for consideration by the FY06 and FY07 Reserve Line and Nonline Major Selection Boards that convened at HQ ARPC...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1998-03235
If not selected for promotion to the grade of major, he be considered for continuation until the completion of 20 years of service. The applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of major by an SSB, which convened on 1 March 1999, for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board. The applicant was notified by letter, 7 January 1999, that SSB consideration had been granted for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board (2 March 1998).