Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01882-2
Original file (BC-2006-01882-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01882-2
            INDEX CODE:  131.00

            COUNSEL: JOSEPH W. KASTL

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s request for  reconsideration,  he  requests  his  Officer
Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 May 1996 through  2  May
1997, be removed from his record and replaced with a  reaccomplished  report
and  that  he  receive  Special  Selection  Board  (SSB)  consideration  for
promotion to the grade of colonel for  the  Calendar  Years  1999A  (CY99A),
2000A (CY00A), 2001B (CY01B), 2002B (CY02B), 2003B (CY03B),  2004A  (CY04A),
2005A (CY05A), and the 2006A (CY06A) Colonel Central Selection Boards.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 21 September 2006,  the  Board  considered  and  denied  the  applicant’s
request.  A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP) is  at  Exhibit
E.

The applicant provided a rebuttal to the advisory opinion subsequent to  the
Board date (29 September 2006).  He states that his OPR  did  not  say  what
his rater wanted it to say.   Comments  were  initially  intended  but  were
inadvertently omitted.  When pointed  out,  the  raters  sought  to  correct
their mistake.  In addition, his commander and a  two-star  general  officer
acknowledged this violated  their  original  intent.   Applicant’s  complete
response is at Exhibit F.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  After reviewing the applicant’s latest submission, we are not  persuaded
the contested OPR should be removed from the  applicant's  records  and  SSB
consideration is warranted.  We reviewed the additional  evidence  presented
in support of the appeal; however, we do  not  find  applicant's  assertions
sufficiently persuasive to override our previous determination.  It  remains
our opinion that evidence has not been presented  which  would  lead  us  to
believe there were errors or improprieties in his  promotion  recommendation
process; or, that he was denied the opportunity to compete successfully  for
promotion on a fair and equitable  basis.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend  granting
the relief sought.

2.    The applicant's case is adequately documented  and  it  has  not  been
shown that a personal appearance with or  without  counsel  will  materially
add to our understanding of the issues  involved.   Therefore,  the  request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
01882 in Executive Session on 5 February 2007, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
                 Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 29 Sep 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Sep 06.





                       MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                       Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01882

    Original file (BC-2006-01882.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01882 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: JOSEPH W. KASTL HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 DEC 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 May 1996 through 2 May 1997, be removed from his record and replaced with a reaccomplished report and that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02321

    Original file (BC-2006-02321.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant requests the Board to set aside his non-selection by the CY04 Major JAG Selection Board. Accordingly, we recommend that his record be corrected as indicated below. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-02321 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01308

    Original file (BC-2007-01308.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) was due the same month as the promotion board was to convene so he requested a commander-directed OPR so information would be available for consideration by the promotion board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPE recommends denying the applicant’s request. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00284

    Original file (BC-2006-00284.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00284 INDEX CODE: 100.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Continuation Board with a Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) of 14N4 (Intelligence) rather than...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00482

    Original file (BC-2008-00482.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the non- selection to “not count.” The applicant did compete for promotion; however, his record was incomplete at the time of the board. Once the signature dates are corrected to reflect dates prior to the promotion board, the applicant will be entitled to special selection board (SSB) consideration in lieu of the FY08 Major Promotion Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00134-2

    Original file (BC-2006-00134-2.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00134 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to Lieutenant Colonel (LtCol) as if he were selected by the Calendar Year 2002A (CY02A) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board based on the “Definitely Promote” (DP) recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1997-10007-3

    Original file (BC-1997-10007-3.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his latest request for reconsideration, the applicant makes arguments similar to those in his earlier appeals and provides the same documents as previously submitted, except for a statement from his former group commander. The ROI also concluded the “Promote” recommendation on the applicant’s CY91A PRF was not an act of reprisal. The applicant’s latest submission still has not overcome the findings of the ROI and the designated senior rater.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02425

    Original file (BC-2005-02425.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Article 15 was removed from the member’s Officer Selection Record; however, it was not removed from the member’s Master Personnel Record. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MRB SUBJECT: I have carefully considered the rationale of the Board majority; however, I agree with the minority member of the panel that applicant’s Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period closing 14...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01104

    Original file (BC-2006-01104.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received his PRF 30 days prior to the board convening and failed to take action to correct his record and was again nonselected. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jun 06, for review and comment within 30 days. We note a Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) is prepared by a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03086

    Original file (BC-2003-03086.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter provided by the applicant’s supervisor [emphasis advisory’s] during the reporting period clearly states he was to provide an AF Form 77 to the rater for an evaluation to be accomplished. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He does not contend that 28 Feb 02 OPR rater was not his actual rater but rather that she was not his direct supervisor. The evidence...