RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00285
INDEX CODE: 111.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 AUG 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 19 Nov 95
to 18 Nov 96 be amended in Section VII, Additional Rater Overall
Assessment, line three, to read “Piloted 23 sorties into Bosnia;
delivered over 1.69 million pounds of vital cargo under severe
conditions.”
His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 19 Nov 95
to 18 Nov 96 be amended in Section VII, Additional Rater Overall
Assessment, line four, to read “Immune to pressure; hand-picked to
brief SECDEF msn for this C-17A flight into Bosnian combat zone.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Line three of Section VII of the contested report overstates his
performance. This is an error that he very recently noticed as he was
working to correct another line on the same OPR. Though it is true
that he flew 35 sorties in support of Bosnia peacekeeping efforts and
all into the Area of Responsibility (AOR), it is also true that only
23 of those were into Bosnia itself. The other 12 were into either
Taszar, Hungary or Brindisi, Italy. The Air Medal required sorties
into Bosnia (15 or 20). His log book accurately preserves that the
23 missions carried a total of 1,694.320 pounds of cargo.
Line four of Section VII of the contested report overstates his
performance. The OPR input he gave to his rater basically said that
he had briefed the SECDEF mission into Bosnia. The meaning was
misunderstood. The facts are that he gave the tactics portion of the
mission briefing to the two C-17A crews at Rhein Main Air Base (AB),
Germany. Following this briefing, these two crews flew the two C-17As
to another airfield where one picked up the SECDEF while the other
remained a ready spare. The primary aircraft then carried the SECDEF
into Bosnia.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
major, having been promoted to that grade on 1 Aug 03. His Total
Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 2 Jun 93.
Applicant's Officer Performance Report (OPR) profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION
18 Nov 94 Training Report
18 Nov 95 Meets Standards
* 18 Nov 96 Meets Standards
18 Nov 97 Meets Standards
18 Nov 98 Meets Standards
18 Nov 99 Meets Standards
2 May 00 Meets Standards
2 May 01 Meets Standards
2 May 02 Meets Standards
2 May 03 Meets Standards
2 May 04 Meets Standards
2 May 05 Meets Standards
* Contested Report.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial indicating the applicant failed to
provide support from the evaluator stating he concurs with the change
to the comment. In addition, the applicant did not provide any
support proving the comment is false.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 12
May 06 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s complete submission
was thoroughly reviewed and his contentions were duly noted. However,
other than his own assertions, no evidence has been presented which
would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators rendered an
inaccurate depiction of his performance. In view of the foregoing,
and in the absence of persuasive evidence that the contested report
was not an accurate assessment of his performance at the time it was
originally prepared, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application. However, if the applicant were
to provide support from his evaluators, we would be inclined to
reconsider his request to amend the contested report.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 Jun 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-00285 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jan 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPEP, dated 25 Apr 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 06.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00587 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 August 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 24 August 2004 through 1 July 2005 be expunged from his records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/ DPPPEP,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00318 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The close-out date of his 30 Jul 99 Officer Performance Report (OPR) be changed to 13 Jul 99; and that Sections VI (Rater Overall Assessment), line 9, and VII (Additional Rater Overall Assessment), line 5, on the OPR closing 6 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02962 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 March 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), for the period 2 June 2005 through 13 December 2005 be replaced with the submitted OPR, which reflects his award of the 2005...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02720
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2006-02720 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 March 2008 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) by the Calendar Year 2005A (CY05A) (6 Jul 05) (P0505A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03682
Each time the report was corrected the current date was used to re-sign the report rather than the date the report was originally signed. The rater states the original report was signed prior to the selection board; he was forced to re-accomplish the report, not only once but twice, preventing the report to be viewed as part of the promotion record. The DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01686
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01686 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Dec 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Reports (OPR) for the periods 1 Mar 02 through 28 Feb 03 and 1 Mar 03 through 2 Jul 03 be modified by adding command push and professional military...
On 28 Jul 97, as a lieutenant colonel, the applicant was punished under Article 15 for two specifications: A. The Board does not agree with the Air Force recommendation to only set aside the specification of the Article 15 dealing with making a false official statement. The Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A, rendered for the period 2 December 1996 through 3 August 1997, be, and hereby is, amended in section VI, Rater’s Overall Assessment, by removing in its entirety line 9, which...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02437
In regards to the applicant’s OPR (c/o date 13 Feb 05), the rater provided a memorandum, stating due to an oversight, the applicant was given an IDE push. AFBCMR (Processing) LATRESE M. TAYLOR Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DATE: 16 Nov 06 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member TYPE OF MEETING: FORMAL _____ EXECUTIVE SESSION X EXAMINER:...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03600
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a detailed personal statement and other documents associated with the matter under review, including top promote materials, board member observations, and documentary evidence pertaining to illegal selection boards. Applicant's complete response and additional documentary evidence are at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board's request, the Evaluation...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a detailed personal statement and other documents associated with the matter under review, including top promote materials, board member observations, and documentary evidence pertaining to illegal selection boards. Applicant's complete response and additional documentary evidence are at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board's request, the Evaluation...