RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03347
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: ALISON L. RUTTENBERG
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect Reserve participation points and
eligibility for full pay and allowances from October 1997 to 6 August
1999, or in the alternative, he be awarded participation points and
eligibility for full pay and allowances from 12 February 1999 to 6
August 1999.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In 1996, he was ordered to active duty for 120 days and was deployed
to Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of contingency operations.
Approximately half way through his tour, he was reassigned to Vicenza,
Italy. He returned from the deployment in February 1997 and completed
his travel voucher. Travel personnel asked him for more information
to process his voucher and he contends he supplied the information.
He also contends he made significant errors on his voucher including
that he had spent the entire deployment in Italy. He contends he was
going through a divorce at the time and had been distracted when
filing his voucher. The travel clerk informed the Operations Group
Commander of the errors on the voucher and the commander referred the
issue to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) who
initiated a fraud investigation.
In March 1997, he was deployed to the Congo, Africa for about 45 days.
He contends he was then assigned to a six-month counter-drug mission
in Riverside, California. He was relieved of duty in October 1997 and
told not to return pending the fraud investigation. Consequently, he
was put on administrative leave, he was administratively demoted from
technical sergeant to staff sergeant, and his security clearance was
downgraded. During the time he was waiting to return to duty, he was
not able to earn points or pay. He refuted the above administrative
actions and appealed.
He contends when he submitted the travel voucher in question, he
provided documentation that clearly showed the dates of his assignment
to Italy, a letter from his deployed commander that authorized him to
travel from Bosnia to Italy, a receipt for translation services that
matched the approximate date of his arrival in Italy, and a
certificate of appreciation for duty in Bosnia that showed his dates
of service.
The Air Force Reserve Personnel Center Vice Commander (AFRPC/CV)
reviewed the administrative actions and the applicant’s appeal and
found there was no attempt to defraud, that only a mistake had
occurred. On 12 February, applicant contends the AFRPC/CV ordered
that his rank to technical sergeant be reinstated. The applicant’s
commander who initiated the original investigation disagreed with the
CV’s findings and re-filed the case against him. His supervisor was
compelled by the commander to write a referral Enlisted Performance
Report (EPR) on the applicant even though the investigation was
pending. This action violated Air Force regulations governing EPRs,
but the EPR was eventually placed in his file anyway. Applicant
appealed the EPR to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) which
granted the appeal on 14 July 2004.
The second filing against the applicant was eventually denied and he
was returned to duty. He had been absolved of any willful intent to
defraud. His security clearance was reinstated and he was returned to
the Intelligence career field.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a statement from
counsel and copies of pertinent documents regarding the correction of
the administrative actions taken against him.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant, a current member of the Air Force Reserve (AFRES),
began his military career on 6 April 1981. He was progressively
promoted to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt) with an effective and
date of rank (DOR) of 16 November 2005. He has over 20 years of
satisfactory service.
In October 1997, he was relieved of duty and told not to return
pending an investigation into his filing of a fraudulent travel
voucher. Further, he was administratively demoted from technical
sergeant to staff sergeant, and received a referral EPR. He refuted
all charges and administrative actions levied against him. On 12
February 1999, his vice commander approved the appeal of his demotion
and ordered he be reinstated to the grade of technical sergeant with
his original DOR. On 6 August 1999, he was officially notified via a
Return to Duty memorandum wherein he was found to be absolved of any
willful intent to defraud. On 14 July 2004, the referral EPR was
removed from his record by the ERAB.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/DPM recommends, at a minimum, the applicant’s military record
should be corrected to reflect 14 active duty (AD) points, 48 inactive
duty points (IDT), and 15 membership points, as well as pay for the
time frame of 1 October 1997 to 6 August 1999. Therefore, for the
retention/retirement (R/R) year of 8 September 1997 to 7 September
1998, he should be awarded an additional 48 IDT points to points
already earned. For R/R year 8 September 1998 to 7 September 1999, he
should be awarded 14 AD points and 44 IDT points to the points already
earned. Further, all pay due the applicant should be awarded to him
in the grade of technical sergeant (E6).
Alternatively, should the Board grant his request, DPM notes he should
be awarded an additional 209 AD points and 29 paid IDT points for R/R
year 8 September 1997 through 7 September 1998, resulting in 267 total
points and that he should be awarded an additional 235 AD points and
22 paid IDT points for R/R year 8 September 1998 through 7 September
1999, resulting in 276 total points.
DPM’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel for the applicant requests the Board approve his request by
granting the relief listed in paragraph 3 of the DPM advisory.
Counsel’s response is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The Board is of the opinion that
the initial investigation into the applicant filling a fraudulent
travel voucher was reasonable and prudent. However, we note on 12
February 1999 the HQ AFRC Vice Commander (CV) approved the applicant’s
appeal of administrative demotion, finding there was no attempt to
defraud, only a mistake, and reinstated the applicant’s rank to
Technical Sergeant with his original date of rank and effective date.
The Board further noted the second investigation requested by the
applicant’s commander was denied, the Enlisted Performance Report
(EPR) referencing the investigation was removed by the ERAB and the
applicant was returned to duty. Therefore, to provide full and fitting
relief, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated
below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. He was credited with an additional 48 paid IDT points
for retention/retirement year 8 September 1997 through 7 September
1998; and, that the period 8 September 1997 through 7 September 1998,
is a year of satisfactory Federal service.
b. He was credited with an addition 20 paid IDT points and
100 AD points for retention/retirement year 8 September 1998 through
7 September 1999; and, that the period 8 September 1998 through
7 September 1999, is a year of satisfactory Federal service.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Ms. Donna Jonkoff, Member
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPM, dated 7 Dec 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 05.
Exhibit D. Counsel’s Response, dated 27 Jan 06.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2005-03347
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was credited with an additional 48 paid IDT points
for retention/retirement year 8 September 1997 through 7 September
1998; and, that the period 8 September 1997 through 7 September 1998,
is a year of satisfactory Federal service.
b. He was credited with an additional 20 paid IDT points
and 100 AD points for retention/retirement year 8 September 1998
through 7 September 1999; and, that the period 8 September 1998
through 7 September 1999, is a year of satisfactory Federal service.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02022
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-02022 INDEX CODE: 126.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: JEFFREY E. CHOSTNER XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Dec 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), imposed on 3 February 2000 be set aside and his Enlisted Performance Report...
When requesting an entire report be voided, the applicant must take into consideration that any complimentary comments on the contested report will also be removed from the records if the request is approved. The report can be corrected administratively by changing the rater’s grade to master sergeant, closing the EPR on 9 October 1997 (the day before the member was demoted and moved to another section), and the “number days” supervision to 192. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation...
In view of the ADB’s finding that he did not communicate a threat to a coworker and should be returned to a participating status, we believe corrective action in regard to his request for point credit from 1997 to 2002 is appropriate. Until such time as the ADB determined that he had not communicated a threat to a coworker, there existed no basis for the commander to determine that he should be returned to a participating status, especially considering the racial incident one year earlier...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01037 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she was not demoted from the Reserve grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) to staff sergeant (SSgt). In support of her appeal, the applicant provided documentation pertaining to the demotion action,...
The DoD/IG investigation stated that from July 1996 through September 1997, the applicant was placed in a “Failure to Comply” status for failing to meet Air Force dental standards four times. The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director, Military Justice, (AFRC/JAJ), reviewed the application and states that the LORs and demotion action complied with applicable regulations and the allegations contained therein are supported by...
He was credited with 31 paid AD points and 29 paid IDT points during the retirementhetention year 27 February 1997 through 26 February 1998, resulting in 75 total points, and, that the period 27 February 1997 through 26 February 1998 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement. c. The applicant’s commander withdrew the discharge action on 3 May 1998, based on the Air Force Reserve Command’s recommendation advising that the applicant had not been afforded due process to progress...
Since the applicant had served on active duty in the higher grade of MSgt from 1 June 1993 through 14 December 1997, an advancement grade determination was required and accomplished at the time of applicant’s request for retirement. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, also evaluated the case and indicates the demotion action taken against the applicant was procedurally correct and there is no evidence there were...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. He was asked to provide a copy of his TDY order, showing that he was deployed in direct support of Operation ALLIED FORCE, and a copy of his Travel Voucher to show that he was in the designated area for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. The KCM is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02286 COUNSEL: MAJ THOMAS L. FARMER HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to master sergeant with an effective date of promotion and a date of rank as a promotee in the SDI 8J000, Correctional Custody career field for 1998 or 1999. The applicant believes that two of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-00230 INDEX CODE 135.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with enough satisfactory years of service to be eligible for Reserve retired pay and that his retired pay grade be master sergeant (MSgt). On 15 May 99, the unit commander indicated the applicant’s performance was not...