RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00839
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 SEP 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Any and all documents referencing mental health disorders and “special
action” be removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never treated for psychiatric disorders and has no history of mental
health treatment. His actions at the time were justified. He further
indicates he was never offered an opportunity to rebut a written statement
from his supervisor.
In support of his appeal, he provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed
Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, a personal
statement, dated 10 February 1966, and a statement from an evaluating
officer, dated 2 March 1966.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 January 1963, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of airman basic.
An AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report, dated 25 January 1966,
states the applicant had a personality and character defect of moderate
severity, best described as schizoid personality, which was manifested by
aloofness, difficulty with interpersonal relationships, and suspiciousness.
The report further states the applicant was unable to perform
satisfactorily because of this defect.
On 25 February 1966, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent
to initiate discharge action against him under the provisions of AFR 39-16,
Unsuitability/Personality Disorder, due to a medical evaluation which
indicated the applicant had a character and behavior disorder - schizoid
personality.
In an undated statement of rebuttal, the applicant agreed with the
statements made by his superiors and doctors. He indicated he had 11
months remaining on his enlistment and desired to remain in the service
until the end of his enlistment.
The Evaluating Officer recommended the applicant be discharged under the
provisions of AFR 39-16 and furnished an honorable discharge certificate
without probation or rehabilitation.
On 25 March 1966, the convening authority approved the discharge.
On 31 March 1966, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of
airman second class. He served three years and two months on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant
states the applicant was administratively separated for unsuitability due
to a diagnosis of schizoid personality. Evidence of record indicates he
was properly evaluated and diagnosed by psychiatrists and he was provided
due process in accordance with Air Force policy and procedure. Action and
disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance
with Air Force directives that implement the law.
The Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 May 2006, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After reviewing the evidence of
record, the Board is not persuaded that the applicant’s records are in
error or that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. Other than
his own contentions, the applicant has not provided any evidence which
substantiates his claim that he was never treated for psychiatric disorders
and has no history of mental health treatment. The Board believes
responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the
separation, and the Board does not find persuasive evidence that pertinent
regulations were violated or that the applicant was not afforded all the
rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. In view of the above
and absent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-
00839 in Executive Session on 21 June 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 8 May 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 06, w/atch.
B.J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00452
The evaluation also concluded that the applicant "has no psychiatric disorder warranting action under the provisions of AFR 35-4" (i.e. did not warrant referral for medical evaluation board). On 12 November 1981, applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service and understood that if his request for discharge was approved he could receive an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01931
On 2 Feb 99, the applicant’s squadron commander notified her he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service, specifically, mental disorders. The applicant was discharged on 4 Mar 99 for “Personality Disorder.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 18 May 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01543
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. While the applicant contends the actions which led to his discharge were the result of physiological problems he was experiencing at the time, a 26 November 1957 medical evaluation determined that he was free of any mental or physical defect and was capable of distinguishing right from wrong. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 8 Jun 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00505
On 19 Oct 81, the discharge authority directed applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge. Although the applicant has requested that his separation code be changed to medical reasons or in the best interest of the Air Force, we found no evidence that his physical fitness to perform his duties at the time of his separation was questionable. We note that the BCMR Medical Consultant indicated that the evidence of record supports a change to the applicant’s separation document...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02356
In support of the application, the applicant submits a copy of his separation document. 173992EA0, which is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant opines no change in the records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant states a review of the records shows that the applicant’s commander based discharge on both unsuitability due to personality disorder and a pattern of misconduct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00201
On 7 October 1998, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant he was recommending her discharge from the United States Air Force for Mental Disorders. Evidence of the record shows that the applicant’s depressed mood resolved by the time of her separation, consistent with her diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder. Following discharge, the applicant experienced recurrent symptoms of depression and developed Major Depressive Disorder with psychosis in January 2004, five years after her discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03867
He was never given a physical prior to his discharge from the Air Force. He had served 2 years, 7 months and 13 days on active duty. Evidence of record and medical examinations prior to separation from the Air Force indicate the applicant was fit and medically qualified for continued military service, retention or appropriate separation and did not have any physical or mental defects which would have warranted consideration in the Disability Evaluation System.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04295
On 19 January 1967, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. We note the applicant requests his discharge be upgraded from general to honorable; however, the evidence of record indicates he was discharged with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01712-2
A summary of the evidence considered by the Board and the rationale for its decision is set forth in the Record of Proceedings, including exhibits, is attached at Exhibit H. In his request for reconsideration, applicant now requests his UOTHC discharge be changed to a disability separation. No treatment was given for MS while he was on active duty. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02281
The applicant believes his record is in error because the Air Force evaluated his unfitting condition of depression at 10% and the DVA in an examination following separation has initially evaluated his depression at 30% and has granted additional service-connected disability compensation for conditions that the Air Force did not provide a rating or compensation for. Disability separation with severance pay was appropriately recommended and is supported by the applicant’s service personnel...